Chicago, IL
Tasted Wednesday, January 27, 2016 by acyso with 599 views
The tasting format at UGC is hardly conducive to writing long detailed notes. The following are my brief impressions tasting through these wines. Read the notes in the context in which the wines were tasted.
The dry wines are an easy pass. They are mostly ordinary wines with not much interesting to say, and many of the wines suffer from the lack of a midpalate. Yet the relatively high scores for these middling wines is representative of the fact that they're good to go now, rather than some fanciful perceived future value of the score.
The Sauternes on the other hand... wow.
Apparently there was some hype about these wines. All I can say is, meh. It's a long string of relatively anonymous wines, with heaps of acid and nothing else. Except for those who decided to "treat" their wines with some good ol' toasty oak. Yum.
Mostly a bunch of ordinary reds, with some real dogs.
A bit oaky on the nose. Not too rich, but there's a touch of red fruit. A bit too much oak on the palate in comparison to the stuffing available.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This is showing a surprising amount of fruitiness. A bit heavy-handed with the oak, which definitely doesn't work too well when you consider that the raw materials aren't quite fleshy, and that the palate is a bit hollow.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very clear toast and char on the nose. Not a good sign. The same toastiness on the palate makes this quite unenjoyable for me. Some red fruits and bright acids, but just not good.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
This is actually quite nice with a restrained hint of plums on the nose as well as some aromas of other fruits. A light touch on the palate make this an enjoyable easy-drinking wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Oooooo... a wine that shows a fair bit of earth on the nose. There seems to be a lovely sense of terroir here, with smoky earth balancing out the fresh acids and light fruit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very, very toasty on the nose and unpleasantly astringent on the palate. You'll be picking out splinters between your gums for days.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
There's an alluring touch of barnyard on the nose of this one, and the palate shows a simple elegance thanks to a smattering of muted fruit flavours. Nice acidity here; this ought to be a great simple drinking wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
More barrel than grape, one wonders if the grapes were an inadvertent addition.
Read 1 Comment / Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Surprisingly, this has a reasonable oak treatment. Certainly a bit more polished than I typically like, but the fruit and acidity gave this a nice freshness that made this quite enjoyable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
I feel that merlot did quite well, as it lent an extra bit of plushness to wines that were otherwise profoundly lacking any midpalate intensity. That said, in the context of the wide world of wine, I would not be keen to spend money and hold these wines in my cellar.
Plummy, red-fruited nose. The palate is very light and elegant, and this would have had all the makings of a fantastic bottle if there were just more stuffing on the midpalate. Lots of acid here... will it ever round out?
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
There's more than a fair dose of oak on the nose and palate, as well as some darker fruit. It's reasonably rich and dense, but the oak juts out just a bit uncomfortably at this stage.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A somewhat foursquare and ordinary bottle, this had a very nice perfumed nose, but the palate was simply hollow and uninspiring. Reasonably high acids here.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Way too much oak char on this wine. Dark fruited and funky, and despite the darker fruit, there wasn't any ripeness. Which means it didn't hold its oak very well.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite heavily extracted, with lots of dark fruit here. The oak sticks out way too prominently, even though this definitely had a bit more stuffing to handle it. The tannins came across here as surprisingly harsh, and this in the context of tasting so many high-tannin wines, really says something about the level of extract here.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This is an extremely light, fleet-footed, and elegant bottle of St. Emilion, that is perfect as the traditional luncheon claret. No fuss, just a simple and honest bottle.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A very lovely perfumed nose, with an elegant and light palate, as well as moderate (but discernible) oak use. Approachable and pleasant to drink now.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This had a very pronounced perfume, with some sweet fruit and florals that was just captivating. The palate here is rounded out nicely, with a relatively unobtrusive oak treatment. Perhaps picked slightly riper, as this does seem to show a bit more heft?
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This is a bottle with a good balance of everything. Red fruited character, light refreshing acids, and moderate tannins. Likely not one for the ages, but as an easy drinker now? Yes, please!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
One of the best Pomerols yet. Blacker fruit, with a little bit of harshness in the tannins. This isn't too dense or potent, but has a pleasant freshness to it. Just a gentle touch of judiciously used oak here. Quite a light wine, but good nonetheless.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Probably my favourite right bank of the tasting. This is one of the few wines that actually seemed to have any density at all. A plush wine in a field of bony skeletons. There were some stone fruit flavours, along with a fair bit of acidity and tannins that weren't too bracing.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Light and red-fruited, with a somewhat pronounced rustic character -- some barnyard and some very chewy tannins. A bit simple and hollow on the midpalate.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
The same problem of a lack of midpalate density manifests itself on the Left Bank as well. There were some decent wines, but by and large, this is a vintage to skip.
This is a little darker than I would have expected from Cantemerle, but that's not to say that this is a particularly different style. This is on the light and airy side of things, but with a focus on black fruit, and makes for an excellent easy drinker (and likely at a very agreeable price point too). This has just enough plumpness to keep it from becoming one of those hollow husks. Cantemerle always does so well on these tougher years...
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very deep red fruit aromas; this is actually quite perfumed. Sweet fruit, with a palate that actually has some stuffing! A triumph in a difficult vintage.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This doesn't have the cleanest of noses, with a touch of barnyard showing up here. There were some well-defined fruit notes on the palate that helped round things out.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Slight plum on the nose, and a good blend of red and black fruit here. Given the nose, I thought this surprisingly dark on the palate, but the midpalate is a little too weak to match that darker fruit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Cherries on the nose, with a well-defined pepperiness on both the nose and palate. A slightly austere palate somehow works well with the lighter density to provide a reasonably easy-drinking wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Dirt! This is one of the most rustic wines of the tasting, with earthy and barnyard notes, as well as very coarse tannins. Lovely acids here, but the wine does come across a touch light.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite dark and brooding, but the acid pokes through a little sharply here. Large scaled, but not enough flesh to keep it together.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Relatively darker on the palate. Shows some oak on the nose, but the palate does have reasonable density -- perhaps this feels a little more integrated in that the acidity here is a little toned down.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
An excellent showing for this wine in the context. Alongside a rather brooding character, there is a nice mix of red and black fruit. The palate's got what it needs here. Well-balanced and enjoyable.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
The oak here really works quite well with the density of the wine. This sits on the darker end of the spectrum, and this is among the densest and richest of the reds on display today. An excellent effort.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
There's some sweet red fruit on the palate that is alluring now, but all in all, this is another in a long line of simplistic wines which show lovely bright acids and red fruit, but lack any density for the long haul. I also sort of expected just a tad more funk, but that's probably owing to my experiences with the Talbots from the 80s.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Report Issue
This is a particularly red-fruited wine, with a nose that promises an elegance that the palate does deliver. On the other hand, if only there were a bit more stuffing for it...
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This is a bizarrely grapey wine, with an absurdly high amount of sweet fruit on the palate. Was this picked really ripe? This is a real oddball in a lineup of simplistic foursquare cabernets.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
The nose on this is very nice, if a bit restrained at the moment. Again one of the wines with pleasant red fruit and tart acids, which doesn't quite have anything in the middle to round things out. Would be more elegant if the tannins didn't finish quite so astringently.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A very nicely balanced Lynch Bages here, but only in the context of the vintage. This is definitely a weak wine by the high standards of this estate. Red fruited and light, with nothing sticking out at all. Sort of a "keep your head down" kind of wine, but it does its job well.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
It's comforting to know that at least Pichon Baron can still churn out good wine, since the 2012 was a bit of a hot mess. The 2013, though, has a nice peppery nose, with good earth tones as well. But the palate is where this shines bright. Despite the lighter fruit and higher acids, this still manages to keep quite a bit of density.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
The green pepper is strong with this one! A relatively austere bottle that has me thinking a little bit of Loire, but the lighter palate seems to work a bit more here since the other components don't pop out as much and this is more clearly cast in an austere mold.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
I love the cherry tones here, as well as the slight barnyard element. Simple and drinkable, with no pretension.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
The Sauternes were incredible. Deep, rich, and powerful, with lovely amounts of botrytis. I found these wines both impressive and approachable. Whether or not any of these get added to my cellar will certainly depend on the pricing, especially since so many of these wines are available with decades of cellar age, for the same price as a new release.
Very apple-y and fresh with an impressive litheness on the palate. Brimming with energy and tension, and a lovely almond-inflected finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A fair bit of funk on the nose that I couldn't quite get past, but this shows its botrytis the most prominently of the sweet Bordeaux here today. Slightly pineapple-y on the palate, but very, very spicy. A touch of bitterness on the back end also detracts from this wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Lots of density on this, with an interesting hint of earthiness thrown in. There's some pineapple gummy candy notes (I'm thinking the Japanese Kasugai ones) on the palate. Good lift here, and very elegant.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Pineapple-bomb, followed by a slight touch of earthy funk on the nose. Reduction, perhaps? Quite elegant and hefty, but I almost want to say that in the context of this wine, I wanted something a bit blowsier... my subconscious telling me that I want Yquem?
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Perhaps on the lighter end of things, this still had a nice glob of sweet fruit on it, but I felt this didn't quite have the same power that some of the other Sauternes had.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Lychees and a hint of green on the nose. Good fruit and spice on the palate, but the moderate acidity and slightly hot finish definitely detract from the overall quality of the wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Immensely floral and honeyed, with a very viscous texture. On the other hand, there's a certain freshness here that keeps this from becoming a plodding beast of a wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This shows a touch of pineapple and some kiwi green as well. The palate has a little bit of astringency that's distracting from an otherwise very powerful bottle of Sauternes.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Suduiraut has always been one of the fatter Sauternes to my palate, and this one is no exception. This is still showing a little bit of a bubble gum note on the nose, which I'll chalk up to being just put in bottle. Very rich on the palate, and the acidity is only moderate, but the immense stature and richness seem to be able to carry on without it. This stuff is already so delicious, why bother aging it?
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This was probably my Sauternes of the tasting -- intensely elegant with lots of citrus peel character, tons of acidity to balance to super rich sweetness and massive amounts of candied tart fruits.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.
2013 Château Carbonnieux Blanc 88 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
This had a distinct grassy and gooseberry nose. Very tart acids, but quite elegant. The oak is quite gentle here, and this is definitely a refreshing bottle of blanc, if a bit veering towards cat pee.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Domaine de Chevalier Blanc 83 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Quite potent pineapple tones on the nose. There's lots to like on the palate, except for an awful astringency that comes from the heavy-handed oak use. Here's hoping it ages and mellows out.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château de Fieuzal Blanc 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Restrained nose, with some high toned aromas. Pineapple on the palate, with lovely acidity, but besides that bracing acidity, there's really not much else going on. A decent high acidity white that doesn't do too much else.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château Larrivet-Haut-Brion Blanc 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Weird funky nose with some clear furry notes. The palate has the same high acidity but hollow feel that so many of these 2013 blancs do. I guess, hope it puts on weight in the cellar?
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château Latour-Martillac Blanc 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Quite a textbook Bordeaux blanc nose, though the palate is slightly astringent and the finish just a touch hot. Again, this is suffering from the high acid/no stuffing problem.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château La Louvière Blanc 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Another reasonably foursquare Bordeaux blanc, which has a touch of fur thrown into the nose for a touch of interest. Just a bunch of acid on the palate, and not much else.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château Malartic-Lagravière Blanc 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Perhaps there's a touch of botrytis on the nose on this? This definitely seems a touch more ripe. The palate here does have a bit of a richer texture, as if this were a "sur lie" wine. On the other hand, texture doesn't do much if the wine just tastes like an anonymous cup of white wine acid.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château Olivier Blanc 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Another reasonably well-made Bordeaux blanc that features high on the acid scale but not boasting much to taste on the palate. The texture here is slightly rounder, but that's pretty much it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château Pape Clément Blanc 83 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
This is another in a long string of anonymous high acid Bordeaux blancs from 2013. The only thing that makes this worse than the rest is the loud oak treatment, which is unfortunate, since this actually seems to have a bit more stuffing than most.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
2013 Château Smith Haut Lafitte Blanc 83 Points
France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
Again this is one of those estates which could easily rise above the boringness of the 2013 Bordeaux blancs, decides to, but then drags everything back down to and below that base level by adding way too much oak. I'm betting that the second wine (which was not poured) is much, much better.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue