Another Tuesday Night in Minneapolis (Montrose 82, 86, 89, 90, 95, 01, 03, 04)

Tasted Tuesday, August 7, 2007 by Dave Dalluge with 1,113 views

Introduction

When Scott Manlin was in town last week he gave me a Bryan Flannery steak to try. Add to this that Steve wanted to test out the TEC grill before committing to buy one and we hatched the idea for a beef taste test. Of course we also needed to find some wine to compliment that beef.

Attendees included Steve Sigmond, Brad England, his son Kevin England, and Chris Larson. Desiree and Diane joined us later in the evening.

Flight 1 - Bruschetta (2 Notes)

What's a Bordeaux tasting without some Rhones. Brad brought a bottle of the Guigal Ex-Voto to try. Most of us had never had this. It is certainly a unique wine. Desiree revisited this at the end of the night and said that it had improved considerably. We drank the Guigal with Bruschetta. I did a basic bruschetta except I added an olive tapenade spread to the crustini instead of just garlic. I poured the Alain Graillot to the group blind. Steve took one smell and said syrah. Brad took one smell and said the only place this could come from was the Rhone. Steve narrowed this down to a 10-15 year old Hermitage. Not too shabby.

  • 2003 E. Guigal Ermitage Blanc Ex-Voto 94 Points

    France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage

    The color is a bold opaque gold. The nose offered an expressive blend of honey, apricot, and butterscotch coupled with strong floral notes. On the palate this is thick and syrupy but has great palate presence and wonderful balance. I thought the finish lingered beautifully (at least one member of the group disagreed with this). It's a real treat to taste this, and it proved to be a wonderful way to start the evening.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1990 Alain Graillot Crozes-Hermitage 91 Points

    France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Crozes-Hermitage

    I forgot to take notes on this one. The color wasa rusty red. The nose was very expressive giving a slightly sour red fruit and a nice earthiness. Medium weight on the palate with excellent flavor. Maybe a touch tart on the finish. This was a fairly complex and slightly understated offering that proved to be very good.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Flight 2 - Lamb Appetizer (3 Notes)

The first flight of Montrose was served with a lamb loin chop appetizer. I adapted this from Rick Tramonto's Amuse Bouche cookbook. The Lamb chop was served with oven dried tomatoes, sauted chanterelles, and a three mushroom vinaigrette. The lamb proved to be a perfect compliment to this trio of great wines.

  • 1982 Château Montrose 92 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    The nose has good intensity -- offering primarily dark fruit and mineral. Excellent despite the lack of complexity. On the palate this has good fruit density with subtle earth/mineral notes. This is still fairly tannic, and the tannin gives it a bit of a rustic/rough texture. It is very well balanced, and the finish is long and satisfying. This is a very nice wine but seems to be lacking a bit in complexity and I doubt additional bottle age will help.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1986 Château Montrose 94 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    Double decanted about four hours before serving. The nose offered a big whiff of dark fruit and mineral with some earthiness. Excellent. The mouthfeel was tremendous -- smooth, balanced, resolved tannin. Flavors of red fruit, mineral, and earth were strong from the initial attack through the long, longering finish. Chris thought the flavors dropped a bit at mid-palate, but I didn't really detect this. A wonderful wine.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1995 Château Montrose 92 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    Decanted about one hour before serving. The color is a dark purple. The nose is a little reserved, but offers a nice blend of dark fruit, leather, and mineral. Excellent. One taste reveals a much younger wine than either of its drinking partners. The taste is dominated by dark fruit, prunes, and mineral. This is extremely tannic -- the tannins obscure the otherwise excellent flavor from mid-palate through the finish. This needs many more years in the cellar, but should prove to be very good.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Flight 3 - Steak Taste Off (2 Notes)

The steak taste off turned out to be a disaster. The steaks were prepared with salt, pepper, olive oil, and a rosemary/thyme rub. I have been grilling these steaks for three minutes per side (all four sides) and they have tended to be undercooked. Therefore I instructed Steve to cook these for four minutes per side. As the fourth side was cooking Brad grabbed a knife and cut the extra steak to test its doneness and discovered it was overcooked. We quickly pulled the other steaks off the grill but it was too late. There was almost no pink left in the middle. The only thing I can figure out is that the grill was hotter than normal because we left it on while we were eating the lamb appetizer. The TEC burners get very hot after a 15 minute warm-up, but must get even hotter with a longer warm-up (Steve was complaining of singed arm hair at one point). The steaks were served with a braised garlic pasta. For what it's worth the Lund's steak was the favorite, but probably because it was the least well done of the steaks. Fortunately this pair of wines more than made up for disappoinment over the steaks.

  • 1989 Château Montrose 97 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    Double decanted about four hours before serving. This was a beauty. The nose offered very clean aromas of dark fruit, leather, mineral, and charred meat (or was that Steve's grilling). The taste was even more smooth and concentrated than the 1986 -- just awesome. This filled the mouth with flavor, had such concentration, and yet seemed so light and silky. The finish was long and satisfying. An outstanding bottle of wine.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1990 Château Montrose 97 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    The nose offered a beatiful blend of dark fruit, mineral, saddle leather, and some floral notes. I re-affirmed my high tolerance for brett by noting that this seemed to be pretty clean and having everyone at the table disagree with me. Upon further review they are correct, there is a pretty strong brett presence here, but I thought it was wll controlled and added to the enjoyment of the wine. The taste displayed awesome fruit concentration, and smooth enjoyable texture, perfect balance, and a long lingering finish. What an amazing wine.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Flight 4 - Dessert (3 Notes)

We drank the third flight of Montrose while finishing dinner and during a pause before dessert. Eventually we moved on to dessert -- a custard/creme brulee made with coffee and cardamom.

  • 2001 Château Montrose 92 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    Decanted about 12 hours before serving. The nose offers an impressive blend of dark fruit and mineral with a touch of oak/vanilla. The taste is equally impressive. Concentrated dark fruit with mineral, grilled meat, and earth. Fiercely tannic. Great finish. This needs many years in the cellar to show at peak.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2003 Château Montrose 95 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    Decanted about two hours before serving. I'm not usually a fan of young wines, but this showed amazingly well. The nose offers an intense blend of red and black fruits that dominate any possible secondary characteristics at this point. A bit jazzy on the palate with bright fruit displaying amazing concentration and flavor. Perfect balance. Awesome length on the finish. I can only imagine how good this will be when fully mature.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2004 Château Montrose 92 Points

    France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Estèphe

    Opened but not decanted about two hours before serving. This is a much more traditional offering than the 2003. The nose gives a stern dose of dark fruit, leather, mineral, and flowers. On the palate this gives dark fruit with dried herbs and mineral in a pleasing but stern and straightforward style. Extremely tannic. Great length on the finish. Some called this slightly green, but to me it was a great lean style of Bordeaux that I love. Glad I've got a case of this hidden away.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Flight 5 - Finale (2 Notes)

After finishing most of the open Montrose I grabbed a bottle of the 2003 Clusel-Roch Condrieu Cuvee P that I purchased at the domaine in 2006. The story is that when Clusel-Roch picked the Viognier in 2003 they had a lot of it that was raisiny from the heat. They vinified this separately as a one-time event. The result was the Cuvee P. I loved this at the winery and it showed well again last night. Surprisingly, the fruit is perfectly ripe and I didn't detect anything in the way of overripe fruit. After Brad, Kevin, and Diane left we gathered in the kitchen to clean up a little. The clean-up staff asked for one more bottle, and I obliged with a Burgundy.

  • 2003 Clusel-Roch Condrieu Cuvée P

    France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Condrieu

    I forgot to take a note on this one, too. I carried this back from the domaine after my visit in 2006. A great way to finish the tasting. The nose offered orchard fruit with floral notes. The texture was excellent -- this was thick and concentrated without being heavy or cloying. Great balance. Long and satisfying finish. A very fun wine -- wish I'd bought a few more.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 1998 Dominique Laurent Mazis-Chambertin

    France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Mazis-Chambertin Grand Cru

    Pulled during clean-up. No notes taken. Popped and poured at cellar temp. This proved to be an excellent Burgundy. The nose gave a lovely cherry fruit with good earthiness. The taste had good presence from the attack through the finish. It proved to be very smooth and caressing after all the tannic Bordeaux. Probably at early maturity. What better to drink while cleaning glasses.

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

Closing

The homogeneity of the eight vintages of Montrose was very impressive. The 89 and 90 are clearly at the pinacle for the last 25 years, but every other vintage tasted bore a similarity to these and showed very well. For me, WOTN honors go to the 1989 Montrose (just barely) over the 1990 Montrose. This is the second time I've tasted these side-by-side, and I hope I get many more opportunities in the future.

×
×