VCTE III & OCP4W I

Tasted Saturday, February 21, 2009 - Sunday, February 22, 2009 by grafstrb with 648 views

Introduction

Tasted these wines for the 3rd Cellar Tracker worldwide Virtual Tasting: Guigal, "Dragonstone", Fritz Haag, and '05 Dead Arm.
Tasted the other wines at the same time during the first Orange County Poker for Wine tournament.

Flight 1 (7 Notes)

  • 2006 E. Guigal Condrieu 89 Points

    France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Condrieu

    (2/21/2009)

    -- cork was removed many hours prior to tasting --
    -- tasted non-blind --

    NOSE: nice bouquet of minerals, stone fruits, and lanolin; note of carmelized sugar emerges with some time in the glass; the bouquet is moderately to very expressive.

    BODY: golden yellow color; medium-full bodied.

    TASTE: hmmmm...weird. unlike others I tasted with, I detected very little fruit on the palate (the "others" have more experience than I with Rhone whites ... so I guess "listen to them") -- I got strong notes of lanolin and lees, as well as some off-putting vegetal minerals; the minerality is certainly here, but seems soft and somewhat muted -- I prefer whites with sharper minerals and acid than this wine has; the mouthfeel is kind of oily; a pleasant apricot note makes an appearance on the medium length finish, which unfortunately revealed a touch of alcohol as well (14% abv). My score below is a reflection of how intrinsically good I believe this wine is, not how much I enjoyed it ... on an "enjoyed it scale" of 1 to 100 (100 being the most enjoyment possible) I would say this was about an 80 for me. Luckily for those who enjoy this type of wine, this seemed to be a well-made wine.

    B: 50, 5, 12, 15, 7 = 89

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2007 Fritz Haag Riesling 87 Points

    Germany, Mosel Saar Ruwer

    (2/21/2009)

    -- cracked and poured --
    -- tasted non-blind over 2 days --

    NOSE: not terribly complex: moderately expressive with some basic lime and other non-descript tropical scents ... on Day 2, this smelled similar to a NZ Sauv. Blanc.

    BODY: green-yellow color; medium bodied.

    TASTE: mildly sweet with nice acidity; simple, and a bit fat. On Day 2 this improved a bit from the previous day, now showing some lemon curd laid over a slightly grassy backdrop.

    Day 1:
    B: 50, 5, 11, 14, 6 = 86

    Day 2:
    B: 50, 5, 11, 15, 6 = 87

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2007 Weingut Josef Leitz Rüdesheimer Drachenstein Riesling Dragonstone 86 Points

    Germany, Rheingau

    (2/21/2009)

    -- cracked and poured --
    -- tasted non-blind over 2 days --

    NOSE: extremely tight, showing minerals, faint papaya, and a touch of green apple ... no improvement on Day 2.

    BODY: pale yellow color; medium bodied.

    TASTE: Day 1: more minerality than the 2007 Fritz Haag Riesling; a touch of lime as well as hints of smoke and quinine; well-balanced with a medium-length finish. Day 2: lost some complexity on the palate, and the finish now lasts an astonishingly short 5-10 secs. Bouquet is still tighter than a nun. My Day 1 enthusiasm for this wine has completely waned ... too bad, as I was hoping this could be my go-to Riesling "daily drinker." On Day 1, this was better than the Fritz Haag. On Day 2, the Fritz Haag was better than the Dragonstone.

    Day 1:
    B: 50, 5, 10, 16, 7 = 88

    Day 2:
    B: 50, 5, 10, 14, 6 = 85

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2005 d'Arenberg Shiraz The Dead Arm 89 Points

    Australia, South Australia, Fleurieu, McLaren Vale

    (2/21/2009)

    -- double decanted the day before tasting: decanted for 6 hours --
    -- tasted non-blind --

    NOSE: strong spearmint note; hint of cherry as well as an odd vegetal aspect; oak; black licorice scent emerges with time in the glass

    BODY: garnet color of great depth; medium bodied

    TASTE: tannic; oaky; sweet leather and bramble along with some blackberries. This wine basically cemented in my mind my growing ambivalence towards Aussie Shiraz. Tasted this against an '06 Dead Arm ... I slightly preferred the '05 over the '06.

    B: 50, 5, 11, 16, 7 = 89

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2006 d'Arenberg Shiraz The Dead Arm 88 Points

    Australia, South Australia, Fleurieu, McLaren Vale

    (2/21/2009)

    -- decanted over night before tasting --
    -- tasted non-blind --

    NOSE: banana bread/overripe bananas; oak; vegetal note; non-descript dark fruits

    BODY: garnet color of great depth; medium bodied.

    TASTE: dark fruits -- especially blackberries; oak; spice; a bit hot; medium length finish; Hold for now.

    B: 50, 5, 11, 15, 7 = 88

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2006 Rhys Alesia Pinot Noir San Mateo County 89 Points

    USA, California, San Francisco Bay, San Mateo County

    (2/21/2009)

    -- popped and poured --
    -- tasted non-blind --

    NOSE: nice bouquet of cherry, cinnamon and Dr. Pepper cola

    BODY: garnet color of light depth; medium bodied.

    TASTE: certainly a delicate-style pinot with notes of cherry and bramble ... improved in the glass. A lot better than an '04 Sonoma County that I tasted a few weeks ago ... the '06 San Mateo county wasn't hot like the '04 Sonoma County was.

    B: 50, 5, 11, 16, 7 = 89

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

  • 2004 Agrícola Falset-Marça Montsant Castell de Falset 88 Points

    Spain, Catalunya, Tarragona, Montsant

    (2/21/2009)

    -- decanted for a few hours before tasting --
    -- tasted non-blind --

    NOSE: vegetal (must have been the Cab. Sauv. kicking-in here); cherry licorice and a hint of anise; hint of old-world funk, but not as much as I was hoping for.

    BODY: lots of superfine particulate matter suspended in the wine (sadly, forgot to note color or weight of wine)

    TASTE: dark berries and leather; short finish; tannic. A bottle of the '04 "old vines" that I had from this producer a few months ago showed its best on Day 3, so perhaps this wine needs the same sort of extended air time to strut its stuff.

    B: 50, 5, 11, 15, 7 = 88

    Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue

×
×