grafstrb
Posts: 408
Joined: 11/6/2007 From: Los Angeles, via Minnesota Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: apes Maybe I should get out of France until I get a better understanding of wine in general. I have more of a grip on CA, Australia, S Africa. With those it just seems I can expierment with bottles and when I find something I like I can rebuy. France just seems so much more complicated, but I love Burgundy, and want to explore Bordeaux and Rhone. apes, welcome France can be a confusing wine region to get into, but this is actually a reason to get into it, not a reason to stay away. The only way you'll really learn about French wine is actively tasting it for yourself. By "actively tasting" I mean really analyze the wine as you're drinking it...think about the wine...look at it...make a point of remembering your impressions...take tasting notes...you'll be amazed at how quickly you can learn if you actively taste. Although France can be confusing, France isn't more complicated, it's just more specific with its labelling. CA basically divides itself into a few wine regions: Central Coast, Sonoma Valley, Napa Valley, Anderson Valley, North Coast (there is some overlap here), however there are many sub-regions within these...the point I'm trying to make is that other "simple" regions are no less complicated than France, really. Bordeaux can be broken down into 3 or 4 main regions, or it can be broken-down into more than 30 specific areas. Experiment with French wines...go into your local wine shop, tell the owner some of the wines you do like, and ask for Bordeaux recommendations that he feels you might like. If the owner "misses" on all his recommendations, try a different store next time. Just last night I had a 2005 Chateau Puynormond which was fantastic...you can view my tasting note here on CT. It was only $20. Another great Bordeaux cheapie is the 2003 Cambon La Pelouse -- fantastic, and only $15.
|