Maestro
Posts: 558
Joined: 10/4/2007 Status: offline
|
I think I spoke my mind before, but here's how I relate to Bordeaux in the new millenium: 2000 > Wonderful... for the long haul... Also drinking well with aeration. Great value at release, still good value when compared to the prices of, say, 2006. 2001 > I love it. Fairly priced, very generous. Drinking beautifully now and much better than the critics predicted. 2002 > Usually I don't like it. Just found the first decently priced 2002 that is drinking really well, so there's hope. But usually they come across as dry and hollow. 2003 > Fun to drink, and -- if properly priced -- a good buy for short-term drinking. 2004 > Rock-solid. Aging well. One of the most versatile vintages and also fairly priced. 2005 > Y'know... Vintage of the century, blah blah blah... Very nice wines but none of them are drinking well now, so judgement is reserved for another 3-4 years on how well they will actually drink. 2006 > The ones I tried were a bit acidic and a bit green. But I don't think they were too bad. But the pricing is prohibitive.
|