jhannah27
Posts: 522
Joined: 6/9/2008 From: Anaheim, CA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: zippz Maybe this is more suitable as a poll... but i'd rather hear more of what people think based on their own experience and reflection on the subject. Based on my own experience, i can't say much...unfortunately my budget is very tight so a $50+ wine is a once in a blue moon encounter. Maybe some of you stock traders and other uber yuppie types can shed some light. Here are two articles that sparked my curiosity/inquiry: "Two Buck Chuck takes a bite out of Napa - Fred Franzia, the man behind America's favorite bargain vino, has a big mouth and an even bigger winemaking empire - one that's scaring the bejeezus out of his elitist rivals." http://money.cnn.com/2007/09/05/news/companies/Two_Buck_Chuck.biz2/index.htm?postversion=2007090703 & "Study: $90 wine tastes better than the same wine at $10" http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580_3-9849949-39.html?hhTest I read about this study a few months back. A the main things that I wondered were, who were the subjects? Were they regular wine drinkers? Randoms off the street? How were they selected? I imagine much of this info is in the scholarly write up from the authors, but I wish the media wouldn't bias the readers by omitting this info. Second, I think one of the commentors at the bottom made a good point as well, "The article headline is a bit misleading. The authors of the study did not conclude that subjects found the $90 bottle 'tastier' than the $10 bottle. They found the subjects simply had a more pleasant experience -- pretty much what one might expect knowing (or believing) that one is enjoying an expensive bottle of wine. Unless, perhaps, one gets stuck with the check."
_____________________________
"Quickly! Bring me a beaker of wine, so that I may wet my mind and say something clever." Aristophanes 450 - 385 b.c.
|