Paul S
Posts: 504
Joined: 1/15/2008 From: Singapore Status: offline
|
Yup - I've heard the same too, but more specifically Southern Rhone, the last time from Pierre Perrin of Beaucastel when I asked him whether 2005 was one of the best vintages for CdP in his memory. He says that 2007 is shaping up to be quite a disaster for France with the exception of Southern Rhone which was saved by a last minute heat wave or something along those lines, now he hopes that the 2007 wines will be even better than the 2005s. But he would say that wouldn't he, vested interests and all? However, I had the privileged of tasting some of the unblended varietals and must say that quality is extremely high across the board, especially with the Mouvedre and Counoise. I here Sauternes are okay, got some Rieussec en primeur, the only Bordeaux I'm taking in this year. D'Yquem is extremely expensive. Back to topic - Burgundy. Not sure about the vintage. However, reports coming in now seem to be more positive than during the harvest last year and the initial winemaking phases. May not be as much a "disaster" as Bordeaux. Although, with production quality on the rise, and global warming, few vintages, if any, are disasters anymore. The last one that did not give much pleasure was probably 1997 or 1998. In 2000, the whites were nice! Even in super-hot 2003, some wines still showed good typicity and look to be good aging potentials. So I'm sure we all can pick something up from one producer or another for 2007. Saying that, I will, like some of you, wait and see. Hopefully taste a few and get a feel of the vintage, both red and white, before buying. Good thing there isn't too much en primeur circus with Burgs and we can actually do that. Serge - I found some of the 2006 to be absolutely gorgeous. Not as balanced as the 2005, or as elegant as the 2004, but with rich ripeness and lots of acid, which bodes well for aging. Some whites, were balance and restraint could be achieved, are immense.
|