Need consolidation of Woot wines

CellarTracker Main Site

Need consolidation of Woot wines

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [Cellar Talk] >> Wine Data Errors & Corrections >> Need consolidation of Woot wines

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Need consolidation of Woot wines - 9/28/2008 10:34:00 PM

Corrado

Posts: 101
Joined: 1/19/2007
From: Vermont
Status: offline

3 wines in the system that are the same thing.

http://www.cellartracker.com/wine.asp?iWine=576401
http://www.cellartracker.com/wine.asp?iWine=576399
http://www.cellartracker.com/wine.asp?iWine=566382

First two entered tonight (401 by me, 399 by another user). Actual wine listing is @ http://wine.woot.com/ if that helps figure out which one to keep (I think the 401 is more accurate based on the write-up)

The 566382 is from a blind tasting earlier this year before it was given an official name and label.

Post #: 1

RE: Need consolidation of Woot wines - 9/29/2008 8:43:48 AM

Eric

Posts: 5742
Joined: 10/10/2003
From: Seattle, WA
Status: offline

Merged. It should actually be listed as Sangiovese as it is at least 75% and that is listed with the varietal on the front label.

_____________________________

Cheers!
-Eric LeVine

(in reply to Corrado)

Post #: 2

RE: Need consolidation of Woot wines - 9/30/2008 6:04:40 PM

Corrado

Posts: 101
Joined: 1/19/2007
From: Vermont
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Eric

Merged. It should actually be listed as Sangiovese as it is at least 75% and that is listed with the varietal on the front label.

Thanks, Eric. I was actually questioning whether or not to list it as straight-up Sangiovese or as Sangio-blend, even though it was 'legally' Sangiovese. I'll make sure I do better in the future.

Thanks for the magic-merge!

(in reply to Eric)

Post #: 3

RE: Need consolidation of Woot wines - 9/30/2008 10:06:53 PM

il Cesare

Posts: 3
Joined: 9/30/2008
Status: offline