Old_Winyards
Posts: 17
Joined: 9/15/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Colonel Lawrence Don't think there is a firm answer on this one. Some Garagiste have soared and collapsed, others are still rising. Of the mainstream the only consistency that I've seen is that the famous (1st's, Petrus etc.) always do well, and so do the consistently well made and fairly priced (e.g. Leoville's Barton and Poyferre spring to mind). I try to buy wines that could become great AND are priced fairly (whatever that means). L. Actually, given Parker's admonition regarding the backwardness of the Left Bank and that '03 was a better vintage for most, I found the Leovilles overpriced in '05 (except for a short time around $80, Leoville Barton sold mostly around $100/bottle) and didn't buy any. I focused primarily on selections where value relative to price seemed to be good, kept in mind his admonition regarding the left bank, and where I would be happy and drink even if the wines didn't score exceptionally well. With the exception of Trotanoy and Pavie Macquin, everything was under about $70/bottle when I purchased. I'm _very_ pleased with the results (Malescot, Clos Fourtet, Pavie Macquin, D'Issan, Brane Cantenac, Branaire Ducru, Pontet Canet, etc...). Moreover, for the few that underperformed from a "rating" perspective, I'm still happy to have Beausejour Duffau, Du Tertre, Lafon Rochet, as I enjoy them year over year AND do not feel I overpayed for them. I think as you pay more, your likelihood for a disappointing evaluation or drinking performance increases (granted, there are probably some opportunities for greater reward as well), as expectations are raised. You can see that result in the Parker thread, where there's alot of dismay that many expensive (exorbitant IMO) wines did not perform to the top end of the barrel tasting range. Clearly, given the hype for the vintage and the subsequent whinging, that's what many Wine Advocate readers expected.
< Message edited by Old_Winyards -- 5/3/2008 7:35:02 AM >
|