Search Results - Save This Search

Wine Type Vintage Name Variety Locale Date Posted Score Helpful Comments Comment Date Community Score More...
Red

1982 Château Mouton Rothschild

Pauillac Red Bordeaux Blend more

5/31/2014 - aquacongas Likes this wine: 97 points

Yes it was great, but I expected more. dark berries, licorice, earth, pepper, fruit tea, sour cherry, Tannins soft and silky, but still present, high acidity, Missing a little bit of complexity, maybe missing a little bit fruit. I know this wine is 40 years old, but anyway. I had it 2012 together with my friend Thomas. I will try it in 2 months. See what will happen then. I prefer the 1986 and 1955 (50+5+14+19+9)

Red

2009 Château de Beaucastel Châteauneuf-du-Pape

Red Rhone Blend more

8/10/2017 - wforster2@gmail.com Likes this wine: 94 points

enjoyed a bottle just like this one last week in Scotland at the Cameron House Grille - the service was poor the food was ok after too many mistakes but this bottle of wine was very good

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    8/11/2017 11:04:00 AM - Ha! Classically Scottish service. I once had a meal in Scotland where the server brought four main dishes that nobody at the table had ordered. When informed of his error, he responded, "Oh, well, can you eat them anyway?" Superb.

White - Sweet/Dessert

2005 Château Guiraud

Sauternes Sémillon-Sauvignon Blanc Blend more

11/26/2017 - Motz wrote: 93 points

Tasted over two days. Potent bouquet of stewed stone fruit (peach and apricot in particular), ultra ripe, (even slightly fermenting), persimmon, cooked apples and pears, orange blossom honey, raw brown sugar, tree ripened mamão, dried candied pineapple, ultra ripe carambola, dried sweetened coconut, exotic spices, and baking spices, along with sweet umami and petrol accents. In a few words: intense, dense, and imparting an impression that they wine might be cloying. Also noteworthy, the more lifting essences common to sauternes, florals, citrus, guava, quince, etc., were mostly absent from the bouquet. Also, botrytis is certainly present and somewhat interwoven with the effusive ripe and cooked fruits, and so is oak, perhaps a small forest of it; certainly the oakiest Sauternes I recall tasting. Oak, it seemed, imparted much of the exotic and baking spices, along with the coconut, accentuated much of the stewed and ripe fruit, and all but drowned out the more lifted essences typically associated with Sauternes.

Among the richest Sauternes I have tasted, almost chewy, even heavy, until medium to medium plus acid kicks in at the back, and holds form throughout a spicy finish of impressive length. Very interesting in that the acid lifts the wine, yet where are the essences that typically lift Sauternes? And, still, what to do with the almost impenetrable fruit density, spice, and coconut, strong portions of which seem oak imparted, until the acid kicks in. Prominent oak also shows behind the fruit, with wood tannin imparting touches of bitterness on the tongue. Recorked, with more than half remaining, and hoped for improvement. Had it at 92 points.

More of the same on the second day, though botrytis elements (sweet umami, petrol) showed more prominently. Orange blossom honey also came forward, adding interest. The framing acids seemed even stronger as well, changing the wine's inflection at the middle to back transition, from a somewhat heavy, even cumbersome wine, to one of vivacity and appeal. Overall, the wine imparted the impression of youthfulness on this day, even from this half bottle. I would not hesitate to hold half bottles for at least five years, and would expect this format to be reaching full stride in seven to ten years.

Not my preferred style of Sauternes, and the imbalance between the density up front and the lift at the back makes this a wine of two halves, if you will, at least to a certain extent. This aside, it does command attention, and creates intrigue. If scoring for right now, 93 points, but a score of 94 seems likely in a few years. 92-94.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    12/1/2017 7:37:00 PM - Marcel Proust, de retour des morts! C'est un miracle!

Red

1996 Clos Mogador Priorat

Grenache Blend, Grenache more

5/6/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 93 points

Cloudy maroon color. Cork was soaked through with signs of seepage, and this seemed a bit stewed at first. However, an hour of decanting let the funk blow off and this revealed a lovely, concentrated nose of cedar, chocolate-covered cherries, and old sweaty leather shoes (delightfully so). On the palate this is all tart cherry and garrigue, with a persistently salty ketchup note to finish. This still has structural support, with a late trumpet blast of spicy, chalky tannin before finishing dry and long. Great terroir. Overall, this is akin to mature Rhone wine or the better California Cabernets of the 1980's. Layers and layers of "the right stuff." Showing stunningly, with perhaps three years of optimal drinking left at a maximum, so don't be shy about opening this now.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    5/7/2013 6:49:00 PM - Decanted overnight, on day two the fruit scents on the nose have deepened. This also takes on a gamey nose of roast venison, complimented by herbaceous anise and thyme aromas. On the palate this is more broad to start, but retains tart tightness and dry minerality on the finish, indicating a good few years of life in this one, yet. Superlative.

Spirits

1992 Suntory The Hakushu, 16 Years Old The Owner's Cask 2F 41566

Yamanashi Malt, Grain more

3/9/2016 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 93 points

Exotic nose of ripe plum, incense, rosewood, and ground cinnamon. Palate is medium-bodied, with the intense flavor of rosewater, showing little of the stern smokiness evident in the Hakushu 12 Years Old. Elegant; one to enjoy for a very long time.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    4/17/2016 10:09:00 AM - Revisiting this, having allowed it an hour to breathe in the glass. What a difference! The nose is in full-on Christmas mode, with ample aromas of pine resin. This also has a sweetly oaky note, a bit like maple syrup. Fully expressing the Hakushu's woodland location, this has become much more interesting and probably warrants a score of 94-95.

White

2007 Bonneau du Martray Corton-Charlemagne

Corton-Charlemagne Grand Cru Chardonnay more

4/21/2015 - Burgundy Al wrote: 93 points

Popped and poured. Apple, lemon and lemon peel aromas and flavors. Lean and somewhat tart to start, with more flesh and weight coming through over the course of a couple of hours in glass. Lots of power, great length.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    4/22/2015 7:13:00 AM - Thoughts on a drinking window? I have a case of these that I am struggling to stay out of.

Spirits

2007 Talisker 10 Year Old The Distillers Edition (bottled 2017) Single Malt Scotch Whisky, 45.8%

Isle of Skye more

9/30/2018 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 92 points

Medium dark burnt orange color. Very coastal nose, with maritime elements balanced by a buttery sweetness. There are swirling aromas of seashells and iodine singing harmoniously in a chorus with creamy notes from the Amoroso cask, and a very subtle orange creamsicle aroma. On the palate, a clean, austere, almost flat entrance gives way to a burst of bitter citrus fruit peel at midpalate. Finishing interminably with a hot, sweet and savory note of Texas BBQ sauce, this lingers with a smoky richness and a mouth-drying stony note. Different than the Talisker 10, this is mainly about the interplay between smoke and creamy richness, rather than the breadth and depth of flavors there. I was able to pick up a bottle on sale for $70 (identical to the core 10 Year Old Bottling), at which price I find this an interesting digression into cask finishing from a distillery that I like very much indeed. However, I'd be reluctant to pay the $95 this commands on release, as it doesn't really improve on the lower-priced and consistently reliable Talisker 10.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    10/3/2018 3:48:00 AM - Speaking of sherry cask finishes, just read this review of the Ledaig 13 Years Old Amontillado Cask finish, which seems like it might be up your alley: https://tinyurl.com/LedaigAmontillado

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    10/2/2018 2:58:00 AM - I see where you're coming from. The sherry cask definitely takes the edge off (whether that's good or bad- de gustibus non est disputandum). Have you tried adding a bit of water to the 10? Like, perhaps a few droplets from an eye dropper? It's bottled at nearly 46%, so you've got a little wiggle room to dilute it down slightly.

    If that doesn't work, I'd strongly recommend the Talisker 18 Years Old. Actually, I'd strongly recommend the 18 in any situation. It's legendary.

    I've not tried the Port Ruighe; as a general rule I tend to avoid their NAS bottlings based on persistently poor reviews. You can read some here: https://tinyurl.com/TaliskerVertical

Red

2009 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Flax Vineyard

Russian River Valley more

1/10/2018 - Carl Thoma wrote: 92 points

California Pinots are not Burgundy or Oregon pinots. They are closer to a Syrah in that rich, fruit intense. Wine still show excellent fruit and very smooth. It is somewhat one dimensional so I doubt it gets any better. Drink it now. It is probably better by itself as lacks structure and acidity to really pair well with food save steak. 14.5%.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    1/11/2018 8:20:00 AM - Good note, Carl. I still have a magnum of this lying around, earmarked for next Thanksgiving. For what it's worth, I recently had a magnum of the 2008 WS Ferrington Vineyard and found it very similar to what you described here- densely fruity, smooth, but one-dimensional.

Red

1993 Château Haut-Brion

Pessac-Léognan Red Bordeaux Blend more

2/14/2013 - DougLee wrote: 92 points

Having decided to celebrate our 20th at Sun Valley Lodge, we made reservations at the Lodge Dining Room for dinner. I happened to drop by a few days early to look at the wine list and to my surprise spied some Bordeaux on the list from the 1993 vintage, our wedding year. The wife suggested a meeting with the sommelier to discuss which bottle might be best, which I thought might not go over so well. As it turns out, the sommelier was great. He met with us and brought up 3 bottles of 1993 Bordeaux from the cellar: a Latour, an Haut-Brion, and a Pichon Longueville-Baron. We chose the Haut-Brion. At dinner, the wine was decanted by candlelight at the beginning of the meal. Nice garnet-purple color. Surprisingly complex nose of barnyard, currant, cedar, earth, and pencil lead. Beautifully-rendered layers of mulberry, red currant, blackberry, char, and tobacco on the velvet-textured palate, which gained intensity and weight as the meal progressed. Modest acidity and rounded tannins contributed a sense of elegance. Moderately long finish showing good grip and sweet currant fruit. Delightful experience from start to finish. This 20 year-old first growth, our first Haut-Brion, was very much alive and a wonderful wine to celebrate with.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    2/14/2013 12:29:00 PM - Great story, and a great review. Happy anniversary- hope it won't be your last (or, indeed, your last bottle of Haut-Brion!)

Red

2010 Pieve Santa Restituta (Gaja) Brunello di Montalcino

Sangiovese more

9/30/2016 - FransS wrote: 92 points

At first I thought to taste a mix of syrah and sangiovese, but it is 100% sangiovese; deep concentrated and very classic from the start to the finish. The iron fist is looking for its silk glove, and I think you have to give this wine some years to find the glove.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    9/30/2016 5:37:00 AM - Can you smell the glove?

Red

2009 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Flax Vineyard

Russian River Valley more

7/16/2015 - golfwine wrote: 92 points

Similar notes to the first bottle but this one was much more integrated & balanced and so, not as noticeably fruity, up front. The Flax continues to be my favorite of their wines and so, I was elated to hear that they're once again, sourcing the grapes. On another note, although some attest that these wines are long-lived, it's my experience that they have a relatively narrow drinking window...not unlike most Pinots, IMHO. This Flax, sings at 3-5yrs after release. Any more and you're playing Russian roulette.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    7/21/2015 1:21:00 PM - Would be interested to hear more thoughts on this. I have drunk Williams Selyem wines with up to 14 years' age on them, but didn't have enough of a frame of reference then to reach an educated conclusion. Does the longevity increase as one migrates up the range in price?

Red

2007 Priest Ranch Cabernet Sauvignon

Napa Valley more

4/20/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 91 points

Dark crimson color. Decanted for two hours, This has a nose dominated by oaky vanilla aromas with undercurrents of red fruit, poblano peppers, and a woody sweetness. This is deep and dark on the palate, with a reprise of the sweet note on the back of the tongue. Long, persistent finish (seven seconds), though slightly bitter, with tart tannins. Good potetial here, but needs a few years for some of the coarse edges on the palate to round out.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    4/22/2013 11:41:00 AM - Decanted this overnight, on day two the wine is much more smooth while not losing any power or concentration. The nose now has a pronounced aroma of chocolate. The palate broadens out to incorporate more deep, rich fruit flavors. If this gives any indication of the maturation potential, there may well be upside to my 91 point score.

Red

2001 C.V.N.E. (Compañía Vinícola del Norte de España) Rioja Imperial Gran Reserva

Tempranillo Blend, Tempranillo more

10/13/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 91 points

Accesed with Coravin. Medium carmine color. The nose immediately expresses a mix of smoky, rocky, woody and fruit flavors. With aeartion, additional nuances of rose petals, berries, roasted bell peppers, cedar, and cinnamon emerge. The palate starts out somewhat restrained by stiff tannins and firm acidity. However, some time in the glass allows this to mellow and express fruity notes like the nose. Regrettably, the nose itself fades during this process, leaving the wine unbalanced between one and the other. This is a complex wine made in a restrained old-world style, but I would like to see it achieve better harmony between fragrance and flavor.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    10/16/2013 6:14:00 AM - Chatters, to first answer succinctly: Coravin is way more than a novelty gadget or a fancy corkscrew. It has its ups and downs, however.

    On the positive side, it performs as advertised, as far as I can tell from a few months of using it. Wine in the bottle stays fresh over several weeks' time. I like that it allows me to have a single glass of wine (on a weeknight, say) without having to commit to an entire bottle, or resorting to a chaper bottle with half poured down the drain or saved for cooking. It's also fun to have friends over and to be able to offer them a taste of anything in the cellar.

    Drawbacks are few, but here they are: it's an expensive piece of kit, at nearly $300. With time and economies of scale, I wonder if the price won't come down? The argon gas also has an associated cost- at $10/capsule and 15 glasses per capsule, it adds about $4 to the cost of a bottle of wine. Thus if you think the convenience is worth, say, a 10% premium, it only really makes sense to use on bottles that are $40 and up.

    Another drawback is that it doesn't allow older wine to aerate and mature, which is sometimes key to enjoying it. I have been underwhelmed by some older bottles at first but, after decanting, they really start to bloom. The downside of the wine remaining fresh is that it stays exactly that way- fresh. I guess you could use the Coravin to decant half a bottle, or to allow the glasses to sit and aerate a while.

    I also had a problem with two bottles- both Fichet Meursault- where everything seemed fine at first. However, the next day I noticed that the cork was soaked through with wine, and the wine had oxidized. I tried this with a second bottle of the same wine and encountered the same issue. I don't know if this is specific to the type of cork Fichet used, but it was irritating to lose a whole bottle and have to drink the entire second one straightaway. That said, I have used this dozens of times on various wines and this is the only issue I have had. However, it makes me a little nervous about using the device on a seriously special bottle.

    In all, I'm a satisfied customer and would recommend this.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    10/17/2013 7:00:00 AM - The Fichets were both 2005. I have used this on older wines (e.g. this C.V.N.E., which I tried again last night, with no issues) that have been just fine. I am thinking now that this is attributable to cork problems with that vintner and vintage, but will check back in if the issues recur with other wines.

Red

2006 Harlan Estate The Maiden

Napa Valley Red Bordeaux Blend more

12/29/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 91 points

Opaque, with crimson rim. Nose starts with a light floral note and quickly becomes more brooding, with ripe blueberry, cedar and ash aromas, and a pervasive flinty or slate-like stone smell. The palate is round and full of fruit, with ripe tomato and blackberry flavors, with subtle woodsy accents. The tannins are softer better-integrated than when I first tried this, but still reasonably firm and tight. This drinks well now with aeration (I decanted for three hours and consumed over another three) but may benefit from 3-5 more years in the cellar.

I respect the professionals at Harlan Estate and think they run a top-class operation from a winemaking and customer service perspective. I am gratified to support their tireless pursuit of excellence with my custom. All that said, I'm not sure this wine is worth the price. As evinced above: I like this wine; however I'm not sure I like it $150 worth. You're at or above the high end of Deuxième Cru Bordeaux at that price point, and I think I'd rather have a Pichon Lalande or a Léoville-Barton. How to resolve this? The commerical director of a winery would know; I don't.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    12/30/2013 9:39:00 AM - Exactly my point, ArtF: my willingness to pay this much is going to be based on whether I have comparable or better alternatives for a similar or lower price. At $150/bottle, I'd argue that I do. In addition to the French wines mentioned above, Harlan's neighbor Dominus sells their first wine for roughly that much.

    As I said, I like the Harlan folks and I enjoy their wine, and I would like to patronize their enterprise through fat and lean years. However, I'm going to be less inclined to purchase consistently in the lesser vintages (2011: I'm looking at you) at $150/bottle, whereas I would probably put in a three-bottle order every year at $75/bottle, just to support the team.

    They know how to run their business better than I do, and I'm sure there is no shortage of takers for every drop they have to offer. I'm not claiming to be anything more than a lone, plaintive voice in the wilderness. I believe the point deserves to be made, nonetheless.

White

2009 Domaine William Fèvre Chablis Grand Cru Les Clos

Chardonnay more

7/3/2014 - Goldstone Likes this wine: 91 points

Silvery Sauvignon Blanc colour. Nose is ozone, fresh-chucked oyster shells, a bracing sea breeze, wet pebbles. Palate is wet stones from a brook, very crisp, white apple, precise but slightly overwhelming acidity. Beautifully made. Some length. Fruit stones emerge on the palate after 2+ hours in the glass. Some length. Super...... but I would mistake it blind for a killer Sauvignon Blanc at this stage of its development. Needs at least another 5 years to flesh out. Everyone loved this.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    7/7/2014 9:13:00 AM - Kindly indicate exactly which Sauvignon Blancs taste like Les Clos, because I'd immediately buy a case.

Red

1998 Faiveley Gevrey-Chambertin 1er Cru Les Cazetiers

Pinot Noir more

3/11/2016 - WoodieBayArea wrote: 91 points

score is for night three, before that this was somewhat closed down and -- unlike many '98's -- a bit tart and shrill... more structure that anything else, than on the last night it opened up a bit, showed some fruit to offset the acid and spices (which in combo had made this shrill over the first couple nights), anyway, I have had great fun drinking my '98's these days but on this one i will wait another four years to open my last two bottles

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    3/13/2016 6:38:00 PM - Thanks for the update. Faiveley's wines have historically been impossible to drink without at least 25 years of age on them. Wonder what the recent stylistic shift of the house will mean for future vintages?

Red

2005 Château Figeac

St. Émilion Grand Cru Red Bordeaux Blend more

10/25/2015 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 91 points

La Fête du Bordeaux (Park Hyatt, Chicago): Medium-dark rosewood color. Ample nose of planed wood with a slightly sweet and toasty aroma, a residual wisp of sous bois, and a slightly green stem smell. The palate, by comparison, is still tightly held in the grip of constricting tannins, giving up little. This finishes plenty strong, with the tannins turning grainy at the back of the tongue. Any thoughts I had of opening my remaining bottle of this will have to wait until 2025 at the earliest.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    3/6/2016 9:15:00 AM - 70+ years sounds like a stretch, but then again the tasting notes for the 1925 and 1945 Château Figeac on CellarTracker seem to indicate that these vintages are still enjoyable. The nice thing about Bordeaux is there's usually plenty of it around if you're willing to pay. If I revisit this in 2025 and it changes my life, I'll certainly be able to find another bottle at auction.

Red

2009 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Sonoma County

more

8/16/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 90 points

Sampled using Coravin. Though I usually decant these, I am drinking this at cellar temperature. I sometimes find that the ample fruit and spice bouquet overwhelms the stone notes, though this serving temperature brings them back into balance, even favoring the latter. What is lost in more expansive berry aromas is gained in a cool slate nuance. This is not totally devoid of fruit, however, having a initial flavor of ripe peach. The palate is linear, with subtle acid and a lingering cola and cinnamon sensation on the finish. In total, this seems more akin to an elegant young Côte de Beaune wine than a flashier (and indeed fleshier) California Pinot noir. Have half a bottle of this left under the ostensibly benign seal of argon gas; will provide updates over time as I am able to taste further.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    8/19/2013 7:40:00 PM - Had another glass of this three days on, again accessed using Coravin. Showing more depth, with charcoal and tobacco flavors emerging on the palate. Fruit flavors tending towards the darker side: plum, blackberry and so forth. Better than the 2009 Sonoma Coast.

White - Sparkling

2011 Mawby Vignoles Crémant Classic Brut

Leelanau Peninsula more

6/21/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo Likes this wine: 90 points

Pale gold in color with light mousse. Very fine bubbles. This is clean, with minty notes balanced by sweet pear flavors. This finishes dry with a pronounced note of chalk. In total, a solidly made sparkler. I would gladly serve this as an apéritif; it is on the drier side and is thus a better Champagne substitute than some Prosecco or Cava.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    12/22/2016 7:13:00 PM - No need to apologize. It can evolve different nuances since I tasted it three years ago. Also, this is all highly subjective and not at all scientific. Also, it's a sparkling wine from Michigan, so I feel like I already went above and beyond by 1) giving it serious consideration and 2) saying something nice about it. On a fun note, I drank this at a Rodriguez concert. Ever heard of him? You should see "Searching for Sugar Man." It's great. Almost as good as a sweet pear.

Red

2005 Reignac

Bordeaux Supérieur Red Bordeaux Blend more

5/7/2015 - Magnum Bill Likes this wine: 90 points

Im a New World, QPR-focused guy looking to expand my horizons by trying Old World product. Recently I saw a video comparing some of the best Bordeaux of the '05 vintage. This $25 bottle scored better than a $1,000+ Petrus and other premieres. Wow! I''m still trying to digest the meaning of that. For some CT'ers it's too oakey. Maybe so. However for this nose, its balance of fruit, acid, grip and length creates an enjoyable quaff...at a terrific price!

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    5/13/2015 11:19:00 AM - I attended a dinner in 2008, hosted by Mr. Vatelot, where we tasted Reignac (2003 and 2004) and Balthus (2003 and 2004) blind against Lafite-Rothschild (2004), Haut-Brion (2003), Cheval Blanc (2003), and Dominus (2004).

    By consensus, the 2003 Balthus and Reignac beat out offerings from the same vintage from Haut-Brion and Cheval Blanc. Lafite and Dominus were preferred, though Reignac certainly wasn't embarrassed by the comparison. Considering that Reignac and Balthus sold for $20-30/bottle, it was a triumph that they held their own against wines >10x more expensive.

    Astute observers will note that all these wines were a maximum of 5 years old at the time. The real test, in my opinion, is whether Reignac will age for multiple decades. Reignac shows well in its youth, but I have difficulty believing that it will be as vivacious in 30+ (or even 60+) years in the way that First Growth Bordeaux from the superlative vintages are. Time, as always, will tell.

    To that end, I have a vertical of Reignac (1998 and 2001-2005) that I've been meaning to taste through. Notes to come, once I get around to it.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    2/25/2016 3:02:00 PM - Finally got around to the Reignac vertical. You can view the results here: https://www.cellartracker.com/event.asp?iEvent=30723

Red

2009 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Hirsch Vineyard

Sonoma Coast more

3/4/2013 - NineteenEightyTwo wrote: 89 points

Dark garnet color. Heady aromas of freshly sanded cedar wood, ripe raspberries, cherry cola and charcoal. This is noticably alcoholic to me, with the 14.1% indicated by the label asserting itself in the form of a lingering burn on the nose. At first, the palate is very mute, pretty much like alcoholic grape juice with very little supporting acid and tannin. With aeration, the nose starts to take on a sweet, toasty crème brûlée scent, and the palate broadens a bit to encompass a bold blackberry flavor. This ends up being forward but still somewhat flaccid; overall it remains underwhelming. Considering there are Grand Cru Burgundies available for a similar cost, the QPR on this is abysmal.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    3/10/2013 9:24:00 AM - Decanted this overnight, hoping for improvement. If anything, it was more dull than on day one, with the aromas and flavors becoming muddled together into an indistinct whole. A real shame.

Spirits

NV Dalmore 12 Year Old Single Malt Scotch Whisky, 40%

Highlands more

8/2/2016 - NineteenEightyTwo wrote: 89 points

Medium orange marmalade color. Aromas of lemon rind, graham crackers, golden raisins, varnish, tobacco, and cedar. The palate is tightly wound, entering with warmth before constricting around a mineral core at midpalate. This has a medium-length finish with a woody note of cocoa beans. The overall effect is bit more rich than a standard Highland malt; what is here has good balance, but I am wishing for some ripe fruit flavors to fill this out. Better to upgrade to the Dalmore 15, which is truly a benchmark Scotch.

  • Comment posted by NineteenEightyTwo:

    11/15/2016 6:04:00 AM - Looks like there is some inventory of the 15 Year Old at http://www.bcliquorstores.com/

    Budget price, too (near US$80)- my competitively-priced local liquor superstore is asking $100. Relief may be at hand!

Loading wine details...
loading

×
×