Search Results - Save This Search

Wine Type Vintage Name Variety Locale Date Posted Score Helpful Comments Comment Date Community Score More...
Red

2019 Domaine du Pavillon de Chavannes Côte de Brouilly Cuvée des Ambassades

Gamay more

4/16/2024 - Big Juicy Red Likes this wine: NR

My last of 6 bottles. The aromas are still lively and fresh, but the taste… the fruit is starting to fade a bit, leaving a more austere wine. I like these on the fresher side. Tanins are fully integrated, so to my taste I’d recommend drinking sooner rather than later, although that seems to go against popular opinion.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    4/17/2024 4:15:00 PM - I'd say! ;-) John Gilman's drinking window STARTS at 2023 and goes to 2055. These wines become incredible with age. But... perhaps your profile name tells us why you prefer these young. :-) No shame in that. These will never be a big juicy wines, and will only lean out over time (for me, into beautiful, ethereal creatures with stunning elegance of tertiary flavors).

Red

2010 Cappellano Barolo Piè Rupestris Otin Fiorin (Gabutti)

Nebbiolo more

1/14/2024 - Robmcl920 Likes this wine: NR

2010 Barolo Tasting; 1/14/2024-1/15/2024: The ‘10 Rupestris is a mind blowing young wine. In a horizontal of 8 top wines from 2010, the Rupestris was my #2 behind the Monfortino. Like the Monfortino, it perfectly blended a core of sweet, primary fruit with intriguing savory characteristics.

When initially opened, the wine almost seemed a bit suspect, with an intense note of leather coming out of the bottle. The wines were opened at 1:00 in the afternoon and then double decanted, and we tasted through the lineup around 5:00 and drank over dinner. With more air, the Rupestris showed much more primary fruit. The nose was intensely perfumed, with sweet red cherry fruit, leather, iron /blood, and red florals, with a hard candy like sweetness to the red fruit. The combination of that sweet red fruit with the savory leather and blood notes made the wine really intriguing.

On the palate, the Rupestris was medium in body and super finessed, with silky tannins that are well on their way to integrating. Again, there is this mix of super sweet fruit and almost rustic, but in a good way, notes of blood and leather. And while the flavor profile leans a bit rustic in a way, the texture of the wine is world class. Compared to the Monfortino, the Rupestris shows less density of fruit, leaning a bit more savory which probably means it will lose its fruit faster than the Monfortino. It is also simply a less dense wine, which makes it a bit more approachable now but also probably will give the Monfortino an edge in decades.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    1/15/2024 9:22:00 AM - Thank you for your wonderful write up! I have many of most of these wines from 2010 but haven't yet opened a single one of them, so it's awesome to read your notes, and surprised to hear that you think they're approachable already. I've opened some of my lower tier 2010s and also have been a bit surprised on their drinkability, so perhaps it is indeed time to crack into the top stuff. I certainly need to at least open a 2010 Bartolo Mascarello because I'm going to paint my cellar and color match the walls to that wine. ;-) I also appreciated how you chose to not score the Cappellano, but also very clearly delineated where it landed in the lineup. For me, scores are super helpful for this, but you've been kind to Teobaldo's request while still assisting the community here. Thanks!

Red

2020 Azienda Agricola Gianfranco Daino Suber

Sicilia Red Blend more

1/9/2024 - Portland Seth Does not like this wine: 78 points

Tastes like tawny port except that it's dry and not sweet. It has a smooth, woody finish and I think it would be great for cooking or Sangria. That's more than I can say for other wineries that have sold me bad wines (not just bad bottles), so definitely not the worst, but it makes me really miss the '18 which was delicious.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    1/10/2024 10:23:00 AM - Wow, I wonder what's happening here? I had the wine at the winery this summer and loved it and it was certainly typical of other vintages (i.e. sublime and elegant), but haven't yet drunk any of my bottles from Garagiste yet. Perhaps I'll have to crack into one soon and investigate these particular bottles!

Red

2020 Domaine du Pavillon de Chavannes Côte de Brouilly Cuvée des Ambassades

Gamay more

9/18/2023 - sid_loves_wine Likes this wine: 93 points

Very punchy and vibrant, in a unique way for Beaujolais- much less about that kind of candied red fruit and more peppery, earthy, wild. At times it was a bit steely and difficult- other times it was super engaging and delicious.

The nose kept oscillating between a strange sort of almost-reductive flinty tone and a snap of crunchy wild raspberry/mulberry. Almost like blood orange. When they meshed together, it was just fantastic, especially by day 2. Acidity is a bit tart sometimes, but again, once the fruit finds its footing, it's really complete. A surprising wash of tannins also, not too coarse, just present and a bit demanding.

Reminded me a lot of my previous experience with Chateau Thivin, the other famous Côte de Brouilly standard. I could be underrating this, especially as I think it could age a bit longer than the average cru Bojo. The 12.5% ABV is surprising, not because it doesn't feel light (it does) but because it has the "profile" of a slightly more entrenched, "serious"-style French wine, if that makes sense. I could say it's "Pinot-like" but that's oversimplifying it.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    11/30/2023 5:36:00 PM - You nailed this note and capture the character of the wine very well! These are the reasons I have the second most bottles of this wine in my cellar than any other. What a fun wine and killer QPR.

Red

2005 Château Branaire-Ducru

St. Julien Red Bordeaux Blend more

10/7/2023 - David Paris (dbp) wrote: NR

No formal notes as this was brought to dinner with friends. This was my first bottle opened from a 6 pack acquired on release, and I was very excited to try this as all the notes this year from the community have been overwhelmingly glowing saying this was very ready and delicious at this stage of its development. I really don't know what to say about it other than it felt completely muted, expressing hardly any fruit, still tight structure, and a really confusing overall picture. I have no idea what was going on here, but this was not good. I will try to check in with another bottle soon.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    11/30/2023 8:52:00 AM - It was decanted and began to be drunk at hour one. We continued to drink it over the next 6 hours and it remained consistent throughout.

Red

2017 Elena Fucci Aglianico del Vulture Titolo

more

8/11/2023 - thwacker Likes this wine: 92 points

Inky purple robe; Bouquet dark fruits and liquorice. On the palate, the wine has abundant tannins and acidity, flavors of blackberries and plums. The wine is fresh and youthful, surprisingly firm for a wine 16 years yound, but this is Aglianico after all. Probably opened too soon, but oh so good!

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    8/12/2023 8:51:00 AM - The wine is 16 years old...?!?! And it's a 2017? Holy crap, the current year is 2033! I have lost 10 years in my sleep last night!

Red

2019 Château Puyanché Francs Côtes de Bordeaux

Red Bordeaux Blend more

4/2/2023 - MAC49 Does not like this wine: NR

The label says 75 Sauvignon Blanc / 25 semillon but it tastes like the opposite. To me there is too much passion fruit, almost syrupy, and none of the zest or minerality of the SB grape. The wine is built well it is just not for me

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    4/2/2023 7:42:00 AM - Perhaps you "drank" the wrong wine in cellartracker? This is a red wine.

Red

2002 Fattoria Galardi Terra di Lavoro

Roccamonfina IGT Aglianico more

3/19/2023 - bon vivant wrote: 97 points

Having read most recent reviews on CT I assume that my own notes & score may be a little controversial. I consider myself a big fan of Nebbiolo and find that the truly good B&B's show best with 2-3 decades of cellar age. I am also a fan of Campagnia and have visited most wineries that are considered the top in the region (including Galardi). Tonight's bottle was in my cellar since 2007 and was decanted for massive amounts of sediment. Right of the bat the aromatics where pronounced and captivating, mostly of dark Cherry fruit and a hint of varnish (likely due to some VA which was not offensive to detract from the wine and eventually receded to barley a hint). No funk or offensive notes this was a clean bottle. It is still a powerful, deep rather then broad wine with elegance and a texture that is silky smooth. The massive tannins that were present in the early years have rounded up beautifully and offer a seamless expression. Within 20 minutes and afterwords the wine was hitting on all cylinders. The fruit aromatics and flavors were now sweeter, complimented by secondary and tertiary smells of old library (old leather) Rosemary, Tobacco, Lilac perfume and tar and forest after rain. The texture was complex with tons of Umami flavor towards the finish which lasts for over 40 seconds with a distinct mineral note. It is very accurate representation of the terrior. This is not going to be a crowd pleasing wine especially with those who like big fruit driven wines. To me the aromas and texture were reminiscent of classic old school Cavallotto Barolos from the late 1970's or Ceretto Barolos from the early to mid 1980's but with the addition of more mineral on the finish. If you are a fan of those kinds of wines you are in for a treat. This is a great food wine: we had it with a simple dish of Capellini tossed with wild mushrooms, a few fried anchovies, prosciutto and capers a little EVO, garlic parmigan and black pepper and it was a great pairing. We had to keep our hands off the bottle as we already kept sipping a good amount before dinner. While excellent still a slight touch below the monumental 2001 which still stands as the greatest Galardi I have tasted. Outstanding. Again YMMV.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    3/20/2023 7:38:00 AM - Wonderful note and thanks for sharing your experience and disclaimers with the bottle! Sounds like our palates align quite a bit (i.e.: many of my peak wine experiences has been with 30-60+ y.o. Barolo from traditional producers). I have well over 100 bottles of Galardi across all vintages, so I'm with you on going long on this producer because I suspected that at peak maturity, they will show as splendidly as your note details. I haven't yet opened any of my 2002's. Sounds like it may be time to check in with one.

White

2020 Domaine d'Orfeuilles Vouvray Silex d'Orfeuilles

Chenin Blanc more

3/7/2023 - jmcmchi wrote: NR

Drunk over three days and a bit of a chameleon.
Day 1 fresh with lemon and chalk, nice acidity, but edgy
Day 2 revealed an annoying metallic note
Day 3 everything came together, what I expected from a Vouvray

Day 2 84
Day 3 89

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    3/7/2023 1:43:00 PM - Thanks for the heads up on the progression... I'll keep that in mind when I open my first one and let it sit for a few days before passing final judgement.

Red

2014 Château des Bachelards Comtesse de Vazeilles Fleurie Le Clos

Gamay more

1/11/2023 - Montesquieu wrote: 88 points

My final bottle from a half case. One prior bottle had possessed a magic balance of dried raspberries and strawberries mixed with subtle earth. Then two duds. This one again lacks the dried fruit. With lots of air/time, the sour notes soften and some pretty earthy, herby flavors remain. But without the dried fruit flavors, it falls short of excellent/90.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    2/3/2023 7:21:00 AM - Thanks for your notes on these... had me crack back into them. I don't know what's going on here. We both had a truly spectacular bottle, and being that yours were so closely spaced, I don't suspect it's an aging problem, but perhaps a bottle variation problem. I have a tremendous number of bottles left after that first experience with it. I hope I get some bottles showing the beauty of the first!

Red

1999 Giuseppe E Figlio Mascarello Barolo Monprivato

Nebbiolo more

1/1/2023 - bon vivant wrote: 97 points

This came as a late decision to accompany home made pasta with mushrooms and smoked duck. So instead of my favorite treatment of slow ox it went into a large (magnum) decanter to blow off some initial bottle funk mustiness. within 20 minutes we started to sip and 10 minutes later the fireworks started. At first this was a little shy with dark fruit (cherry) dominating but the long finish gave us a great intro to what's to come. A classic Barolo evolution in the glass with a kaleidoscope of scents and flavors continuing to emerge, tapanade and herbs come into the fold and some forest floor, then more red fruit and an hr into it the proverbial roses and tar. A softer velvety mouth feel as it opens and warms up. Eventually leading to strawberry and brown sugar sweetness and Umami porchini whifs on the finish. This walks a really nice balance between power and elegance and is drinking beautifully right now at what i expect is just getting into an optimal zone. I looked at Galoni's drinking window which gave it up to 2024 and IMO it is way underestimating the potential longevity if this bottle is a good indication. This was sipped over 2.5 hrs and was truly meditative, so good nothing was left for the next day. to truly appreciate this wine I highly recommend quite enjoyment and make sure you don't over decant as in such a case you may miss a good part of the show.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    1/21/2023 10:05:00 PM - Great note. Thanks for the heads up.. sounds like I should crack one in the next few years to see what sounds like a very pretty spot for the wine. The last one I had in 2014 was closed as a rock.

Red

2005 Réyane et Pascal Bouley Volnay 1er Cru Clos des Chênes

Pinot Noir more

1/8/2023 - tomandlu wrote: NR

Uncorked but not decanted and consumed over the following 5 hours. Virtually opaque deep garnet red. Very closed on the nose from the outset and only began to open up, even sitting in a glass, for three hours or more. Once it did the aromas were still reticent and took aggressive swirling to reveal classic notes of sous bois, some tobacco, and gobs of red fruit. The wine was equally closed on the palate but showed deep red fruit, solid yet ripe tannins, and good acidity, all beautifully balanced. The finish was actually the best part of the wine this evening, long and deep and fragrant. Clearly my bottle was far more closed than other who have tasted this recently and I'll wait at least another 10 years before opening another. Purchased on released and stored in my cellar since.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    1/9/2023 7:34:00 AM - Bummer yours wasn't showing as well as mine! I was a bit surprised that I got so much enjoyment out of my first bottle. Generally I agree that this is 10 years from peak, though, even considering the enjoyment I received from the bottle I just opened. I had 8 bottles though, so I figured ~13 years old was a fine time to crack the first bottle, and I'm glad I did. I'll probably wait another ~4-5 years before the next, because I do think it is still in the early window phase.

    Hope to drink with you again soon!

Red

2010 Vietti Barolo Castiglione

Nebbiolo more

12/14/2022 - jshufelt wrote: 93 points

I enjoy my own notes - yeah, like I'm really going to wait another 20 years before opening another bottle. Three weeks, 20 years, what's the difference. I crack me up.

Anyway: sometimes I'm glad I don't take myself too seriously when it comes to tasting notes. This bottle was noticeably more open than our prior bottle, with more pronounced strawberry and cherry aromatics, and ample cherries, plums, currants, and secondary notes of rose and asphalt on the palate, with manageable tannins throughout. Still on the early side of the drinking window, to be sure, but better than looking at the window longingly from a distance.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    12/15/2022 5:39:00 PM - I am not sure if you believe in or have experience with such things, but according to the Biodynamic Calendar, you consumed this bottle in December on a "Fruit Day", the best day to drink red wines as they are the most expressive, and the bottle in November was consumed on a Root Day, which is the worst and they feel a bit more shut down.

    Hey, I'm not saying this is the truth, just pointing it out. :-) I don't know if I believe it yet because it seems so wacky, but I swear when I have a similar experience to the one you just had, where two bottles consumed so close and one showed better than the other, I swear 80+% of the time I go back and check, the better bottle was consumed on a Fruit Day. Has to due with the moon or some shit. Have fun!

Red

2005 Réyane et Pascal Bouley Volnay 1er Cru Clos des Chênes

Pinot Noir more

12/8/2022 - David Paris (dbp) wrote: 92 points

Bought on release 15 years ago and this is my first bottle of 8 to open... the early writers had me burry this one deep. The initial aromas on a pop and pour are absolutely gorgeous, and certainly showing wonderful development at this stage, offering plenty of mushrooms, earth and sous bois, but it blossoms like a beautiful flower even with the smallest pour. Really, a gorgeous nose and one that makes me think: This is why aged Burgundy! Palate is completely harmonized, perfectly in balance with a killer attack of acidity and tannin, just a hint of the mushroom, but it's primarily vibrant bright red tannic raspberries... an absolute gorgeous wine on the palate. Finish is still tremendously structured, robust, and nearly hard, showing massive piles of acidity and still fairly gritty tannins. This is still coupled with complete beauty and harmony, though, so I'm not offended, because it's still offering wonderful bright red fruits that are the lingering flavor minutes later despite the tongue still feeling the tannin as well. It does make the mouth water for more, though. This wine is at a beautifully elegant entry point of its evolution... I am indeed happy I waited so long for the first one, as this is just now entering what I'd call an early, but long peak drinking window. I'll continue drinking these for a couple decades. Surprisingly, I think this drank best on a pop and pour, and lost some of its complexity after a 3+ hour slow o and later into the night and the next day. This was poured alongside a 2017 Pierrick Bouley Volnay 1er Cru Santenots, and I believe the winemaking style with Pierrick has shifted so much you can hardly tell they're related. This is still very old school and required all this time to get to this point, whereas the 2017 was completely approachable (and quite a bit softer) at its young age.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    12/9/2022 2:59:00 PM - Very true that the vintages (and vineyards) are very different here... My comment on style I guess has more to do with my drinking of many vintages going back to the 90s, as well as conversations with Réyane and Pierrick that I had during a visit at the winery in Volnay in 2018. There's no doubt that Pierrick has changed many things both in the vineyard (going organic, lower yields) and the winery, and while I do believe Pierrick is most certainly still firmly in the traditional camp, there does seems to be a very intentional action to "improve" the wines and make them more approachable in their youth (not so "old school"). How it lands is up to every taster's palate! The press has written about this shift quite a bit, as well (The Wine Advocate, Allen Meadows, and The Fine Wine Review have written about the shifts). So... I think it's all the things, including the vintage and vineyard (I find their Clos des Chenes is always a more structured wine) difference as well, and I could have done a better job of noting that.

Red

2013 Vietti Barolo Ravera

Nebbiolo more

12/8/2022 - Ben Christiansen wrote: NR

Also with a touch of a port like smell to the nose. Full and round with an intense grip on day five.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    12/8/2022 4:15:00 PM - Wow, three one line notes on the exact same bottle of wine you followed for days? I guess that's one strategy to catch Richard Jennings as the most prolific CT tasting note writer. ;-) I pray not everyone starts doing this... talk about clutter.

Red

2019 Domaine Guion Bourgueil Cuvée Domaine

Cabernet Franc more

10/30/2022 - David Paris (dbp) wrote: 88 points

Holy cow, is this wine intense this vintage! I found the 2018 rendition of the Domaine absolutely sublime and beautiful, drinking so elegantly, soft, pretty, and fruity. This is NOT that. I could tell on first pour, as it feels thick in the glass, with an impenetrable darkness to the color. Also this wine has quite a bit of sediment in my very first pour; something I haven't experienced with prior vintages. The nose is brooding, but still pretty, showing elegance even if the aromas are of tar, graphite, stones, and blackberry seeds. The palate is where this gets intense. Thick and viscous in the mouth, but tannins very quickly build and it's coupled with deep, dark heavy fruits. As it stays in the mouth it gets more intense, with some puckering acid and bitterness building. The finish dials that intensity up even more, showing ripping gritty tannins and acidity, a mouth full of drying earth dust, with just slight bits of fruit poking through. Indeed, this is incredibly rustic and dry; an absolute brut this vintage. The stuffing is definitely there for this to soften and become a beauty... this is just a different vintage than I've ever experienced of the wine. I'll drink my 2018 Domaines while I let this rest for at least 5 years, but more than likely, 10+.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    11/1/2022 3:02:00 PM - I saw your note on the 2009 Prestige (as I still have a few)... a wonderful note you wrote! Yes indeed, I can't agree with you more... I love aging these things as my plan is to have Tuesday drinkers that were $13 on release, 20 years from now! Can't beat Guion for that, which is why these days I snatch up at least a case of both the Prestige and the Domaine (or whatever they're relabeled as this year). This is serious juice, for as you say, supermarket plonk money.

Red

2001 Giuseppe Rinaldi Barolo Brunate Le Coste

Nebbiolo more

5/21/2022 - KeithAkers wrote: 95 points

il gran finale del Barolo di compleanno (Osteria Langhe, Chicago IL): This is one of the most aromatic and perfumed noses so far. It is lifted, and fresh with loads of strawberries, bright red cherries, fresh picked berries, morning dew, balsamico notes, roasted herbs, earth, potpourri, licorice, spices, and wild flowers with a bit of VA that pokes in and out. The Medium/full bodied feel is beautifully balanced and deep with crisp, high acidity and silky, high tannins. The feel seemed to glide across the palate with a finish that won't seem to quit. The VA from the nose is also just a bit present on the palate as well. Even with that bit of VA, this is a gorgeous Barolo that just ticked off all the boxes for me. Bottles of this have been varied, but when they're on, they're on.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    7/19/2022 8:02:00 AM - I have just one bottle (purchased in Italy)... thanks for the note! I'll let this sit for a while longer.

Red

2007 Johan Vineyards Pinot Noir Three Barrel

Willamette Valley more

6/4/2022 - tomandlu wrote: 83 points

Not decanted. Deep garnet red with considerable fading at the rim. The nose was quite muted at first but eventually opened up to reveal some red fruit and earth but little complexity. The wine was pretty harsh and angular on the palate for the first 90 minutes or so and then softened. Tastes more of structure and acidity than anything else. Can the fruit really have already faded? Stored in my cellar since release.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    6/5/2022 9:07:00 AM - Uh oh... I haven't opened one since 2013! I need to drink more of these. Look out for my note... if I can find them!

Red

1979 Cavallotto Barolo Riserva Bricco Boschis Vigna San Giuseppe

Nebbiolo more

6/2/2022 - Jeremy Holmes wrote: NR

The cork and bottle were in splendid condition. Gave it a long vigorous decant and it was absolutely singing by the time we got to it. The nose has spent fireworks and tar to begin. Pretty soon decaying rose, pine needles and darker vinous things appear. There's a suggestion of Indian spice too. The palate is deep and chewy, with complex savoury traits. It has wonderful acidity and finish of authority and persistence. In a wonderful place.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    6/3/2022 9:18:00 AM - Great to hear; thanks! I'm still sitting on a bottle, and was wondering it it may still have some life left. Nice to hear of a recent person enjoying it. It's my birthyear, so I'm always looking for '79s to drink throughout the rest of my life. How much time do you think I have left to hit this in a good spot?

Red

2016 Burzi Barolo

Nebbiolo more

9/23/2020 - forceberry wrote: 92 points

The fruit is sourced from several vineyards in La Morra, planted to 100% Nebbiolo Lampia clone and aged from 25 to 60 years of age. Macerated for 15 days in stainless steel tanks. Aged in 3000-liter Austrian oak botti casks. 14,5% alcohol.

Pale, translucent brick-orange color. Big, brooding and quite impressive nose with bold and attractive aromas of cherry marmalade, some strawberry, light pomegranate tones, a little bit of smoky funk, sweet nuances of very ripe figs, a hint of wizened red plums and a touch of pipe tobacco. Despite the intensity, the nose isn't overwhelming, but instead quite elegant and fine-tuned. The wine is ripe, dry and juicy on the palate with a moderately full body and intense flavors of juicy black raspberries, some succulent red plums, light sanguine notes of raw meat, a little bit of funky, savory spice, a hint of crunchy cranberry and a mineral touch of gravelly earth. The overall feel is textural and quite silky with a relatively gentle structure that relies more on the moderately high acidity than on the gentle, well-behaved medium tannins. The high alcohol lends some warmth to the palate. The finish is ripe, gently tannic and quite long with dry flavors of crunchy cranberries, some tart red plums, a little bit of gravelly minerality, light brambly notes of black raspberries, a hint of meaty umami and a touch of tobacco.

A lovely, clean and attractive Barolo. Quite textural and accessible for its age, lacking the tough, tightly-knit tannins one would expect from a Nebbiolo clocking at 4 years of age. The overall style is quite gentle, transparent and more concentrated on the purity of fruit than on power and structure. It's hard to assess whether this will be a long-lived wine, but the wine is drinking mighty well right now and probably for the next 4-6 years. Definitely a wine made for the fans of classicist, Burgundian wines, but probably not one for those who equate power, concentration and extraction with quality.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    10/6/2021 7:52:00 AM - Great note, thank you! I'm unfamiliar with this producer and haven't found too many detailed notes to give me a sense of the house style. Your note was very thorough and helpful!

Red

2018 Domaine Fumey-Chatelain Ploussard Grappes Entieres de Fertans

Arbois Poulsard more

9/14/2021 - David Paris (dbp) wrote: 60 points

This is truly one of the worst wines I've had in years. I have no idea what's going on here with this bottle, but there aren't any obvious "flaws" of the bottle itself, but I simply cannot believe that anyone would intentionally release a wine that tastes like this; this isn't just a matter of preference, I don't believe... I am game for weird tasting wines, but this just does not taste good. I followed the wine, open, for days and it never became drinkable. I tried from the first glass I poured over those days, as well as fresh pours from the bottle, and it never became drinkable. So... onto my note: This is one of the most disgusting wines I've smelled in a long time... truly acrid. It's as if a rat colony has been eating the interior of your 80 year old car, and then they had a mass extinction event and you found their dead decaying bodies a couple weeks later. You take that smell, and you couple it with the stench of some old dog shit, and you have what could be in my glass if poured blind. I'm not trying to be funny here... that's really what it smells like. There is really not any appealing aspects of this nose, and I tried plenty to find something; it's just shit and dead rats. The palate shows some of that, but it actually has some grape fundip flavors and moderate acidity and tannins are felt. It's not too offensive in the mouth. The finish attacks hard with more dead rats and dog shit, as well as plenty of robust structure of acidity and soft, fine grained tannins. It has really nice structure. The acid lingers long on the finish showing some magnesium powder, but all those shitty flavors linger too. It's like the dog shit has been laying out on your lawn for a few weeks before you discover it, and when you pick it up it cracks open a bit and you get some of those fresh but slightly rotten flavors. Again... not sure what's up with this bottle.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    10/3/2021 2:18:00 PM - The bottle was certainly not corked (no TCA present). It could be “flawed” but in a way that I can only think would occur in winemaking/bottling. I’d have to try several more bottles to be sure what’s going on, but it’s nice to know you had the bottle and it didn’t resemble mine. I asked the shop about it and they said they’d keep a bottle for me as they suspected something was off with mine. Again, if this bottle was off in the way it showed, I’d suspect at least some percentage of bottles would also show this way. If I try another bottle and it doesn’t resemble this one, I’ll likely remove my score… but as it sits now nothing about it seemed to be a one off bottle issue. Thanks for your feedback!

Red

2018 Domaine Guion Bourgueil Cuvée Prestige

Cabernet Franc more

6/10/2021 - David Paris (dbp) wrote: 90 points

After the amazing bottle of 2018 Cuvée Domaine, I think I bought more of the 2018 Prestige than any wine in my life. Is it worth it? Well... perhaps it's too early to tell. The 2018 Cuvée Domaine drinks better today. The Prestige is most certainly much more structured and robust. It has now been in the glass for an hour or so. The wine requires attention to not miss the elegance that lies beneath the structure. On attention, the aromas offer lithe berries, intense chalk dust, and pretty cutting graphite. It's interesting how intense and strong those aromas become after multiple large huffs. It still feels compact on the nose, but elegance does shine through. Palate entry starts with tight, integrated blueberries, but that quickly transitions to the massive, intense structure that surrounds this wine. Impressive tannins, acidity, and minerals are all present in earnest. Keeping this in the mouth for any length of time only intensifies the structural elements and perhaps covers some of the flavor components. Acidity is actually the dominant structural element on the finish, but of course this is coupled with intense, fine grained tannins, and its presence is felt up to a minute later. There is no doubt this is an impressively built wine. Again, totally nuts that something like this can be had for under $14. My score is for enjoyment today, but I am very happy with this offering... it's just too early to fully enjoy this wine and I expect many points higher of enjoyment in due time. This is a bottle that should age gracefully for 3+ decades. Glad I have one for every year of that time... perhaps that's what I'll do with them, so by the time I'm 80 I can finally figure out how exactly a Bourgueil ages.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    6/10/2021 9:40:00 PM - I saw your note on the cork and forgot to mention that mine was flawless... no streaks up the side and just red on the tip, where it should be. This was my first bottle of the '18 Prestige and I also didn't have any cork problems with either '18 Domaine I opened.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    7/13/2021 9:19:00 AM - Thanks for your thoughts, kdubler! I totally agree with you on all fronts, and it's great to hear confirmation from another experienced palate with these wines. My first vintage with both the Domaine and the Prestige was the 2009 and I have been buying whenever possible since then. It's one of the true bargains in the wine world. We actually had a visit planned at the winery in Bourgueil for March of last year, but had to cancel the trip three days before departure! We will make it there soon...

White

2005 Stéphane Cossais Montlouis-sur-Loire Le Volagré

Chenin Blanc more

7/2/2021 - depechemoroder Likes this wine: 91 points

This has just crested over the hill, but still in a very nice place. Strong note of apples - somewhere between baked and wizened, but definitely not fresh. Classic hints of lanolin and straw, with some citrus freshness to balance. Definitely a touch oak spice, though well integrated. The acid is quite assertive, but it's not out of balance or unpleasantly sharp. There is still a sense of what was probably a classical crystalline structure in all its glory, but this needs drinking.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    7/2/2021 6:28:00 PM - Thanks for the note... I've lost mine, and need to dig them out of boxes! Last one in 2015, so I'm well over due and sounds like I may have missed the peak!

Red

2014 Château des Bachelards Comtesse de Vazeilles Fleurie Le Clos

Gamay more

1/28/2021 - Montesquieu Likes this wine: 93 points

Popped a second bottle of six because it's 2021, and one drinking window starts in 2021. Decanted 45m before drinking began with a savory, slightly spiced pork loin dinner. I'm a fan of beautiful, delicate reds, and my score reflects a respect for the difficulty in making these, as mistakes are far more obvious than in hedonistic reds. This lacks mistakes. Flavors are as savory as sweet, with the sweet being light red fruit (raspberry, dried strawberry) and a touch of perhaps cranberry. Hard to top this for a delicate red to go with delicate meats (would love this with rabbit!). I'm fairly confident that this will improve further with age (2-10 years?) and look forward to the next four bottles.

  • Comment posted by David Paris (dbp):

    1/29/2021 12:42:00 PM - I agree, this is a very special bottle of wine! Thanks for sharing your appreciation with us.

Loading wine details...
loading

×
×