• DoubleMagnum wrote: 91 points

    May 16, 2023 - Yep, you all were right. This needed time. Drinking well now. The tannins are well integrated and it is much drier than I expected. Not overly complex but very enjoyable.

    Comment
  • jrrosenberg wrote: 87 points

    October 18, 2014 - Tannins strong on pnp. cherries up front. Very pinot like. Still will benefit from additional year in cellar.

    Comment
  • sastewart wrote: 90 points

    March 2, 2014 - Better than I expected. Some floral, red friut and tar on the nose. A bit tight at first with a little oak, but opened to plum and red fruits, graphite. Firm finish. Several years to go. 90 points

    Comment
  • HWgeek wrote: 91 points

    August 29, 2012 - Nice nose, with plum and oak on the bouquet. The palette presents plum, dark cherry, slight oak and finishing long with tannins, good acidity,without being overwhelming, the tannins are not the old over the top traditionalist, but not a total fruit forward wine either, it works the way it was bottled. Color is slightly darker than expected more reminiscent of a pinot noir.

    Comment
  • RussK wrote: 92 points

    May 26, 2012 - RussK MIA GC at Shapiro.

    Comment
  • burr wrote: 88 points

    May 3, 2012 - Not undelicious, but very atypical for barolo. Blind, I would have said it was pinot noir.... red fruit on the nose with ashy cigar, rich fruit-forward palate. Strawberry, candied cherry.

    Comment
  • burr wrote: flawed

    May 3, 2012 - Corked.

    Comment
  • Suss wrote: 85 points

    April 1, 2012 - Very thin and flat. It opens more with time but still not great. Even at $20.

    Comment
  • SC OLY wrote: 88 points

    January 18, 2012 - Light ruby color. Not a heavy barolo. Nice fruit and very smooth. Enjoyed with Chicken Marsala.

    Comment
  • Lprhi1 wrote: 86 points

    January 8, 2012 - Need time to open up the flavors! Has some nice plum and dark cherry taste!

    Comment