• David Paris (dbp) wrote:

    December 31, 2014 - Drank after a 1990 Dom Perignon and actually it didn't suck, considering. In fact, this was the best bottle that I've had of these! Who'd have thunk it'd improve over time... the first few bottles were quite rough but this one was very nice.

    Comment
  • ckeilah wrote: 84 points

    January 1, 2012 - Good stuff for what it is. Hell, just good stuff. With a sense of humor. :-)

    Comment
  • foobarski wrote: 84 points

    May 29, 2011 - Made a pleasant enough dinner pairing with fairly spicy red curry Thai chicken. I definitely tasted yeastiness, even at this late date.

    Comment
  • AdamRobert wrote: 84 points

    January 1, 2011 - Nothing to write home about, but solid and well-made. Maybe not the best QPR but the label was funny.

    Comment
  • pechluck wrote: 75 points

    January 1, 2011 - Plain and simple, sparkles with bubbles but little flavor, good in a mimosa. We all bought the bottle because of the label anyway, admit it...

    Comment
  • jsimmons wrote: 85 points

    December 9, 2010 - Not awful, but not really memorable either. All the usual sparkling wine stuff is there, but it's not very well put together.

    Comment
  • 10centpower wrote: 81 points

    November 19, 2010 - One of the worst QPR's I've ever tasted. There's an ocean of cava and prosecco more interesting than this. No nose to speak of, dull on the palate with bracing acidity. Barely suitable for mimosas.

    Comment
  • nlassow wrote:

    January 1, 2010 - This is identical to the Windsor Vineyards 2001 Brut. Green apple, nothing crazy. Fun label.

    Comment
  • aces219 wrote:

    January 1, 2010 - Lots of tart Granny Smith apples, with maybe a little pear - like pear cider. For a late disgorged wine, I couldn't detect much yeast or breadiness at all. So that was rather disappointing. It is a pleasant enough wine but poor qpr since it is rather one-dimensional.

    Comment
  • jkwatson wrote: 86 points

    January 1, 2010 - Fairly standard California sparkling wine. Nothing spectacular, but nothing terrible, either.

    Comment