Community Tasting Notes 14

• g money Does not like this wine: 60 points

  June 6, 2015 - Very disappointing, nothing on the nose or on the palate. Food coloring in water? Maybe..

  1 person found this helpful Comments (1)

• KikeG wrote: 83 points

  February 18, 2013 - Good but not great.

  Comment

• primitivo wrote: 79 points

  January 25, 2013 - Clear ruby in color; closed muted nose of must, cherry, a bit of cedar; still some decent fruit, cherry and raisin, on the palate; lightly structured and somewhat weak body; minimal finish. Pleasant but not pleasing, if that makes sense. I would serve this at a picnic, but not at a sit-down meal with discerning oenophiles. I don't dislike this wine, but I don't like it enough to buy again.

  Comment

• ewisor wrote: 77 points

  August 17, 2012 - Was initially promising when I first tried it two years ago so I bought a case. Unfortunately, it just keeps getting worse each time I try it. Fruit faded fast and now it is developing a bitter finish.

  Comment

• Craigbilodeau wrote: 83 points

  July 12, 2012 - I found this to be a little too acidic. I let it sit for a day in the fridge (vacuum sealed) and it did open up a little bit. Still, I found the wine to lack structure and depth.

  Comment

Pro Reviews 0

• No pro reviews found.

Wine Definition

• Vintage 2009
• Type Red
• Producer King Estate
• Varietal Pinot Noir
• Designation Acrobat
• Vineyard n/a
• Country USA
• Region Oregon
• SubRegion n/a
• Appellation Oregon
• UPC Code 768675085929

Community Holdings

• Pending Delivery 0 (0%)
• In Cellars 72 (30%)
• Consumed 166 (70%)

Food Pairing

Who Likes This Wine

More About This Wine