Not as good as the bottle I had a few months ago. It is not as vibrant as it was in the past. Dark fruit on tne nose. The palate is dark berries, tobacco and a touch of thyme. The finish was moderate.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
From a 375. Opened and lit sit for an hour. Dark fruit on the nose. The palate was blueberry, dark plums and a hint of thyme. A moderate to long finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
The note below is accurate for us. Tertiary indeed. Good balance, too. Although we have fallen out of love with California Cabernet generally, we really enjoyed this one over four nights, gassed and refrigerated in between. (Given as a gift; it was bought from the winery on release, we believe.)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
So, this is the second bottle of Cyrus I've ever had in my life so I'm not exactly a Cyrus expert and "groupie" like I know some are. I was told or at least led to believe that this is one of the age-able wines of the northern Sonoma region, but I'm not so sure of that. This wine tonight truly had some tertiary characteristics starting to peek in. Cork was a medium cherry stain upon extraction. Wine was poured to a dark maroon. Nose was blackberry and spice. The wine was served PNP, and the wine was mostly black licorice on the front with some fig and a mild raisin note, and smelled with some mild age. The middle of the wine was dark, a little bit of flint, but this is where mushroom, fig, apricot, and raisin started to crescendo to the middle. The finish was thick and dense, but a little tart and herbaceous. Tannin is here, but on a whole the 2010 vintage has much more tannin and is much more exuberant. Bottle was not purchased directly from the winery but was purchased in a store. This is not a bad wine, but at $50 QPR, I think I'd choose a lot of other things. Drink now. Done by 2018.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
9/19/2019 - markcic Likes this wine: 88 Points
Not as good as the bottle I had a few months ago. It is not as vibrant as it was in the past. Dark fruit on tne nose. The palate is dark berries, tobacco and a touch of thyme. The finish was moderate.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/25/2019 - markcic Likes this wine: 90 Points
From a 375. Opened and lit sit for an hour. Dark fruit on the nose. The palate was blueberry, dark plums and a hint of thyme. A moderate to long finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/10/2016 - Copay Likes this wine: 92 Points
Used aerator when decanted. Drank immediately. Deep purple color. Very rich mouth feel. Leather was predominant. Loved it.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/5/2016 - Deux Chevaux wrote:
The note below is accurate for us. Tertiary indeed. Good balance, too. Although we have fallen out of love with California Cabernet generally, we really enjoyed this one over four nights, gassed and refrigerated in between. (Given as a gift; it was bought from the winery on release, we believe.)
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/17/2015 - mflesh wrote:
So, this is the second bottle of Cyrus I've ever had in my life so I'm not exactly a Cyrus expert and "groupie" like I know some are. I was told or at least led to believe that this is one of the age-able wines of the northern Sonoma region, but I'm not so sure of that. This wine tonight truly had some tertiary characteristics starting to peek in. Cork was a medium cherry stain upon extraction. Wine was poured to a dark maroon. Nose was blackberry and spice. The wine was served PNP, and the wine was mostly black licorice on the front with some fig and a mild raisin note, and smelled with some mild age. The middle of the wine was dark, a little bit of flint, but this is where mushroom, fig, apricot, and raisin started to crescendo to the middle. The finish was thick and dense, but a little tart and herbaceous. Tannin is here, but on a whole the 2010 vintage has much more tannin and is much more exuberant. Bottle was not purchased directly from the winery but was purchased in a store. This is not a bad wine, but at $50 QPR, I think I'd choose a lot of other things. Drink now. Done by 2018.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment