Pro Reviews
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your
personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below.
Learn more.
Decanter
JancisRobinson.com
Winedoctor
JebDunnuck.com
Winedoctor
JebDunnuck.com
View From the Cellar
Winedoctor
The WINEFRONT
Vintage Tastings
Winedoctor
RJonWine.com
Rockss and Fruit
RJonWine.com
NOTE: Some content is property of Decanter and JancisRobinson.com and Winedoctor and JebDunnuck.com and View From the Cellar and The WINEFRONT and Vintage Tastings and RJonWine.com and Rockss and Fruit.
4/13/2024 - MJReb wrote: 93 Points
The last bottle of a long evening, no detailled notes, but a lovely, harmonious, refined wine in a perfect shape. Incredible how CNdP can age, 29 years nevertheless.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/18/2024 - La Sprezzatura wrote:
Beaucastel Tasting Wunderbrunnen Opfikon
general remarks:
the wines are in general more on the elegant side. red berric. high acidity. almost no wood (they only use 5000+ liters „foudres“) intermixed with some spices and flowery aromas. especially the older vintages gave me some "burgundy vibes". there was some bottle variation (some oxidative bottles), especially with some warmer and better rated vintages such as 1995 and 1999…
the younger the wines got the more similar they became and were hard to distinguish. also hard to tell where the younger vintages will end up in future. highlights were 1991 and 1996 (both 94 points).
in the cellar they use as low intervention as possible. every grape gets fermented on its own. they choose oxidative or reductive ageing for each grape separately according to the characteristics of the grape.
the chateau is owned and ran by the family perrin (7 ppl).
Tasting note Beaucastel 1995:
maggi and intense saw dust, oxidative.
maybe flawed?
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/28/2024 - bon vivant wrote:
Good fill, good looking cork, lots of sediment, benefited from 45 min of decant but somehow this was not as good as previous bottles. While it was enjoyed and serviceable it had something a bit lacking in both the aromatics as well as the mid palate. No oxidation or heat damage and the color was proper... I could not discern any flaws but strongly suspect something was a bit off here. Oh well no great wine only great bottles ...
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
2/2/2024 - chitowncdpguy wrote:
Wow.
Two notes:
1) this had a lot of sediment, decant for sediment
2) while beautiful, it faded pretty quickly after being in the decanter around the 4 hour mark
This was absolutely fantastic. Smooth and gorgeous right after decanting and consistent until it started to fade. Simply beautiful, aromatic, at this point very elegant, and still quite vibrant.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/21/2024 - hargy wrote:
my last two bottles of this vintage and what a disappointment! - the first was spoiled although the cork was in perfect shape and the other was dead with the fruit completely gone
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment