Opened this at a small gathering in our backyard. This was similar to the last bottle - i.e. a decent Bdx blend with some age, but nothing special. Three bottle lot from recent auction is now gone.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
2nd of 3 bottles. Cork was in great shape with this bottle, hardly stained past the bottom. This showed a little better than the first bottle, as it seemed more integrated, but I still found the elevated volatile acidity to be a little distracting. Not bad, but I wish I had more of the 2000!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Opened this after a really nice bottle of the 2000. Cork stained the whole way up, but I was able to get this mostly out except for a couple of small pieces. Unfortunately, the 2000 outshone this by a wide margin. This started off with elevated volatile acidity that gave this a sharp attack. Not overwhelming, but more than a little distracting. After the initial sharpness, a dense clump of fruit and oak awaited. Mouthfeel was a little coarse and the oak seemed to dominate the flavor profile. Overall, not bad, but I was expecting more after the really surprising 2000 bottle that preceded this. Also, I agree with the previous note that this is drinking much younger than its age. Amazingly, this did not change much in character after being open for 3 days (stoppered overnight in the wine fridge). If scoring, I'd be somewhere in the 85 - 87 range. Hopefully, the two remaining bottles will show better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Giving it 92 only because it drinks like a 2016. Without knowing it was a 2006 I’m not sure I would have guessed it was a 2006. Drinking very well and maybe even very young. Great wine with a smoked tenderloin with friends. Honestly very primary and could go easily another decade+.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Cadence Winery Ciel du Cheval Vineyard Red Wine Red Mountain) A surprisingly different nose from most wines found from this vineyard with chocolate, juicy plum, and herbal notes. A very dry wine with a pleasing tannin profile. Still young and needs time to open up. 36% Cabernet; 32% Cab Franc; 20% Merlot; 12% Petit Verdot. 14.4% alcohol.
NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Vinous and Washington Wine Report.
7/8/2023 - PIntag wrote: 88 Points
Opened this at a small gathering in our backyard. This was similar to the last bottle - i.e. a decent Bdx blend with some age, but nothing special. Three bottle lot from recent auction is now gone.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/20/2023 - PIntag wrote: 88 Points
2nd of 3 bottles. Cork was in great shape with this bottle, hardly stained past the bottom.
This showed a little better than the first bottle, as it seemed more integrated, but I still found the elevated volatile acidity to be a little distracting. Not bad, but I wish I had more of the 2000!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/8/2023 - PIntag wrote:
Opened this after a really nice bottle of the 2000. Cork stained the whole way up, but I was able to get this mostly out except for a couple of small pieces.
Unfortunately, the 2000 outshone this by a wide margin. This started off with elevated volatile acidity that gave this a sharp attack. Not overwhelming, but more than a little distracting. After the initial sharpness, a dense clump of fruit and oak awaited. Mouthfeel was a little coarse and the oak seemed to dominate the flavor profile. Overall, not bad, but I was expecting more after the really surprising 2000 bottle that preceded this. Also, I agree with the previous note that this is drinking much younger than its age.
Amazingly, this did not change much in character after being open for 3 days (stoppered overnight in the wine fridge).
If scoring, I'd be somewhere in the 85 - 87 range. Hopefully, the two remaining bottles will show better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/26/2022 - Scotty56 wrote: 92 Points
Giving it 92 only because it drinks like a 2016. Without knowing it was a 2006 I’m not sure I would have guessed it was a 2006. Drinking very well and maybe even very young. Great wine with a smoked tenderloin with friends. Honestly very primary and could go easily another decade+.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
8/23/2019 - djpo wrote: 91 Points
Gorgeous wine. Ready o drink.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment