Acquired more than a dozen years ago, and stored in a temperature and humidity controlled cellar. First bottle in a number of years. Have also consumed the 2005, and own the 2007.
Poured about 90 minutes before consuming. Plenty of orange at the rim. Aromatically this offers tobacco, damp soil, and some floral. On the palate the attack starts with a sour and tart black cherry. A pasty blackberry moves this into the mid-palate without much fanfare. On the brief finish this offers more of the sour black cherry notes. Frankly a very puzzling tasting - no wow factor, no savory qualities, no energetic grip. Seems to plod along without direction, energy, or uniqueness. Comes across as something that has passed its best days. Just blah.
I recall the 2005 exhibiting similar ‘meh’ qualities after about 15 years, whereas the younger version had more drive and definition. Seems to be a good example of an entry level barolo that is better in the first 10-12 years. This is a pattern I am finding more frequently, even in well regarded vintages.
Had my other bottle of this wine about 3.5 yrs prior. This one had a cardboardy note that kinda blew off over 30 mins, revealing beautiful Nebbiolo fruit of sour cherry and tobacco. Nice but had some minor flaws.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Smooth and silky. Did not decant and opened up in glass. Well balanced and good structure with mild tannins. Lucious fruit, with oak, leather and tobacco. Threw off some nice sediment (lees/pectin). In it's prime, but with should drink well for the next couple of years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
2/29/2024 - Nw23 Likes this wine:
Drank 2/27/24. Opened it an hour before tasting. Bright acidity that was softened around the edges.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/5/2024 - COWineLover wrote: 86 Points
Acquired more than a dozen years ago, and stored in a temperature and humidity controlled cellar. First bottle in a number of years. Have also consumed the 2005, and own the 2007.
Poured about 90 minutes before consuming. Plenty of orange at the rim. Aromatically this offers tobacco, damp soil, and some floral. On the palate the attack starts with a sour and tart black cherry. A pasty blackberry moves this into the mid-palate without much fanfare. On the brief finish this offers more of the sour black cherry notes. Frankly a very puzzling tasting - no wow factor, no savory qualities, no energetic grip. Seems to plod along without direction, energy, or uniqueness. Comes across as something that has passed its best days. Just blah.
I recall the 2005 exhibiting similar ‘meh’ qualities after about 15 years, whereas the younger version had more drive and definition. Seems to be a good example of an entry level barolo that is better in the first 10-12 years. This is a pattern I am finding more frequently, even in well regarded vintages.
2 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (3)
2/2/2024 - drrobvino wrote:
Had my other bottle of this wine about 3.5 yrs prior.
This one had a cardboardy note that kinda blew off over 30 mins, revealing beautiful Nebbiolo fruit of sour cherry and tobacco.
Nice but had some minor flaws.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/19/2023 - pmik wrote: 90 Points
Vinnørd Storchsvej. Past peak but still very much drinkable - drink now!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/2/2023 - Robwild Likes this wine: 93 Points
Smooth and silky. Did not decant and opened up in glass. Well balanced and good structure with mild tannins. Lucious fruit, with oak, leather and tobacco. Threw off some nice sediment (lees/pectin). In it's prime, but with should drink well for the next couple of years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment