Dark red fruit, a little sour, some nice leather and mineral notes, but rather cloudy, thin and acidic. This bottle had some good qualities, but was well past its prime.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Brought by new friend CH to a wonderful dinner at the PUC (nope, not the one that sets PG&E rates) and arranged by CT friend DQ (nope, not the one owned by Mr. Buffett). On the nose and palate, light to medium notes of mixed red berries, cherries and red and black currants, dry earth, sous bois, leather, Bordelaisean funk, balsamic, saline and a light tobacco note. Medium garnet, light to medium bodied, medium+ legs. Quite intense and intact acidity, well-integrated and silky tannins, and not a trace of heat in the 12.5% abv. VG+ complexity, good+ persistence and intensity. PnP then consumed over a couple of hours, this mature and majestic BDX came out of the chute a bit backward, with electric acidity giving the wine lift with the mostly red fruit following slowly and progressively thereafter, with the acidity slowly integrating and balancing but staying very present. Distinctly savory and not remotely sweet, this cuvee recalls a favorite Old World Napa BDX blend, Cain Five. I’ve liked this vintage—a ‘90 Montrose the generous A_M poured for me several years ago was a wow wine—but with limited experience, found this bottling a bit challenging (the ‘86 of this was likewise poured by said A_M) for my California-ized, albeit inflected with an Old World sensibility, palate. This worked better for me than that bottle, perfectly matching and complementing the setting and meal (both, in every sense, stunning), the powerful structure working really well, in particular, with the rib cap steak. (A Materium would seem about as much out of place in these environs as a Pimm’s Cup would have been at the Pyramid Club.). With its relative reticence, I do wonder if this might have flourished even more if given some additional aeration, but as I’ve commented elsewhere, I often feel as if many of the BDX I drink have another gear which I’m not fully accessing (as a side note, part of the purpose of the dinner was to discuss my interest in joining a group of devoted BDX enthusiasts, so I’m definitely hoping to learn more). This could develop further in the near future, but my confidence in drinking windows with BDX is less than Napa or Tuscany, so I’m not pushing all of my chips into the middle one way or another on that. Drinking wine, for me, at its best often embodies an entire experience which transcends the bottle itself, and on that basis alone, this merits a far higher score than if I drank this on my own at the NV abode. Many thanks for a wonderful evening, Chuck, and I look forward to our future enological adventures! 93-94
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
This bottle of 1990 Gruaud Larose shows a big, gregarious nose, full of ripe raspberry - but it's also full of horse. There's more brett than I'd like to see, but the smoke, leather, and Iberian ham notes aren't totally obscured by it.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Nose: Dark berries, pickled beets, bell pepper, turned soils, leather and horse. Palate: Good entry with dark blackberries and ripe raspberry, but there is a lot of garden note and a briney note distracts from the fruit quite a bit.
This was a really difficult bottle of this wine for me. Came in and out throughout the dinner and was at times horsey and mared by brett, other times well focused. Close to calling this an off bottle.
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
3/29/2024 - djhammond Likes this wine: 95 Points
A BYO in a restaurant. This delivered as always. Tasting profile as previous notes.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
3/23/2024 - CHINACAT wrote: 89 Points
Dark red fruit, a little sour, some nice leather and mineral notes, but rather cloudy, thin and acidic. This bottle had some good qualities, but was well past its prime.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/7/2024 - sfwinelover1 Likes this wine: 94 Points
Brought by new friend CH to a wonderful dinner at the PUC (nope, not the one that sets PG&E rates) and arranged by CT friend DQ (nope, not the one owned by Mr. Buffett). On the nose and palate, light to medium notes of mixed red berries, cherries and red and black currants, dry earth, sous bois, leather, Bordelaisean funk, balsamic, saline and a light tobacco note. Medium garnet, light to medium bodied, medium+ legs. Quite intense and intact acidity, well-integrated and silky tannins, and not a trace of heat in the 12.5% abv. VG+ complexity, good+ persistence and intensity. PnP then consumed over a couple of hours, this mature and majestic BDX came out of the chute a bit backward, with electric acidity giving the wine lift with the mostly red fruit following slowly and progressively thereafter, with the acidity slowly integrating and balancing but staying very present. Distinctly savory and not remotely sweet, this cuvee recalls a favorite Old World Napa BDX blend, Cain Five. I’ve liked this vintage—a ‘90 Montrose the generous A_M poured for me several years ago was a wow wine—but with limited experience, found this bottling a bit challenging (the ‘86 of this was likewise poured by said A_M) for my California-ized, albeit inflected with an Old World sensibility, palate. This worked better for me than that bottle, perfectly matching and complementing the setting and meal (both, in every sense, stunning), the powerful structure working really well, in particular, with the rib cap steak. (A Materium would seem about as much out of place in these environs as a Pimm’s Cup would have been at the Pyramid Club.). With its relative reticence, I do wonder if this might have flourished even more if given some additional aeration, but as I’ve commented elsewhere, I often feel as if many of the BDX I drink have another gear which I’m not fully accessing (as a side note, part of the purpose of the dinner was to discuss my interest in joining a group of devoted BDX enthusiasts, so I’m definitely hoping to learn more). This could develop further in the near future, but my confidence in drinking windows with BDX is less than Napa or Tuscany, so I’m not pushing all of my chips into the middle one way or another on that. Drinking wine, for me, at its best often embodies an entire experience which transcends the bottle itself, and on that basis alone, this merits a far higher score than if I drank this on my own at the NV abode. Many thanks for a wonderful evening, Chuck, and I look forward to our future enological adventures! 93-94
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/14/2024 - englishman's claret wrote: 91 Points
This bottle of 1990 Gruaud Larose shows a big, gregarious nose, full of ripe raspberry - but it's also full of horse. There's more brett than I'd like to see, but the smoke, leather, and Iberian ham notes aren't totally obscured by it.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
1/13/2024 - RockinCabs wrote: 88 Points
Nose: Dark berries, pickled beets, bell pepper, turned soils, leather and horse. Palate: Good entry with dark blackberries and ripe raspberry, but there is a lot of garden note and a briney note distracts from the fruit quite a bit.
This was a really difficult bottle of this wine for me. Came in and out throughout the dinner and was at times horsey and mared by brett, other times well focused. Close to calling this an off bottle.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)