A trio of 2001 DRC. I've had bad luck with the RSV, but tonight I thought it excellent and the best of the trio. The Richebourg was very good and showed well. The Grands Echezeaux was also very good, but slightly less enticing than many previous bottles, and it's a wine I've loved over the years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Very biodynamic, almost murky nose. Lots of dark fruits and remarkable level of fine tannins. There is lots going on, far from ready to show its real glory.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Patience required on this one as took quite a bit of time for the nose to come alive and when it did, the violets were harmonious and soft.
Wine structure was decent with tannins and acidity well balanced so can still go on with further cellaring. Had sparks of primary characteristics some fresh cherries yet it lacked the usual sweetness of ripe red fruits.
Tertiary notes evident towards the end, tea/sois bois on display.
Overall, pleasant but just lacked that little bit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Romanée-Conti Grands-Echézeaux) Medium, medium-plus cherry red colour. The nose is a little less extrovert than the Échézeaux. It starts with powdery red fruit - no raspberry - but moves on to give a deeper and sweeter black cherry aspect coupled with a little earth. The palate gives the impression of more density and a blacker tone to the fruit. The acidity is first class and that tannins show a velvet touch. On the finish this shows less like the Montrachet/Échézeaux with pure fruit lingering well. Whilst still a backward wine, this shows much better than in January and you can easily see that although it is a little less 'flashy' than the Échézeaux, it also has more potential.
(Romanée-Conti Grands-Echézeaux) Again a medium, medium-plus cherry red colour. Where the Échézeaux was 'broad' in the nose, this is more focused though giving-up less. Higher toned with more maraschino cherry. The palate shows higher acidity and again, svelte, discrete tannin. The palate is also more focused and deep, though less 'broad' than the Échézeaux. There's similar outstanding length, but to start with the wine doesn't have the overall appeal of the Échézeaux. Slowly the nose starts to develop a wide, subtly spicy undertone (takes more than 10 minutes in the glass) which also starts to increase in depth. The palate is unchanging. I tried the second bottle and there was more obvious oak - though transient. This showed a little more depth than before and even a black edge to the fruit on the finish.
NOTE: Some content is property of Decanter and JancisRobinson.com and The World of Fine Wine and Vintage Tastings and Burghound and Vinous and Burgundy-Report.
3/9/2024 - BradE wrote:
A trio of 2001 DRC. I've had bad luck with the RSV, but tonight I thought it excellent and the best of the trio. The Richebourg was very good and showed well. The Grands Echezeaux was also very good, but slightly less enticing than many previous bottles, and it's a wine I've loved over the years.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/8/2024 - shifter wrote:
DRC Montrachet Vertical: A bit lighter framed than the RSV/Rich, but to be expected. Not quite as much complexity, but lovely soft tannins.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/14/2023 - vinhslee Likes this wine: 92 Points
Very biodynamic, almost murky nose. Lots of dark fruits and remarkable level of fine tannins. There is lots going on, far from ready to show its real glory.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/14/2023 - yangtoa Likes this wine: 85 Points
Patience required on this one as took quite a bit of time for the nose to come alive and when it did, the violets were harmonious and soft.
Wine structure was decent with tannins and acidity well balanced so can still go on with further cellaring. Had sparks of primary characteristics some fresh cherries yet it lacked the usual sweetness of ripe red fruits.
Tertiary notes evident towards the end, tea/sois bois on display.
Overall, pleasant but just lacked that little bit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/31/2022 - cortoncharlie wrote:
Good? Yes. Great? Probably not. Maybe it needs a bit more age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment