Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (4) Avg Score: 89.7 points

  • This has a more delicate nose than the 1952 Berberana Rioja that preceded this '61, with trace funk and just a whiff of dried cherry. On the palate, this shows drier tannin. This is the softest of the three Rioja on the table (the third being the '64 Berberana). I really like this. It features a warm and soft palate. This is like a warm velour blanket. Long, dark cherry finish with leather notes. Wow. As it airs, however, Bob calls this "flaccid" and says that "there is not much left here", but I love it. Very long. Warm, caressing finish and I'm back to the blanket metaphor. After about 2.5 hours, I agree with Bob and this loses some steam; loses richness and interest. Really nice for the first couple of hours, though.
    Lunch at Le Perigord.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Full bottle, crumbly cork, decanted and drunk over a couple of hours. So much better than the Sampling taste of this earlier in the week; this is a far better bottle. Slightly smokey, dusty nose with a touch of meat. Really quite full and round in the mouth. A touch of orange peel coming through on the nose and the acidity, initially less than the Conde pair, develops more too. Lovely old Rioja. No mention of hierachy here - neck says Crianza but label same style as the GR ones. ****

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Sampler pour. Mid garnet. Quite an oxidised nose, some sweet fruit and development. Good acidity on the attack. A bit of mocha complexity coming through on the nose. Quite light. Reasonable length. lacks mid-palate complexity. Decent enough but a tad faded. Not the greatest of examples I suspect. ***

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • The newish neck label over the capsule, which carried the bottle number, clearly specified "Vina Crianza." Yet the capsule itself was not original, and beneath were vestiges of a former hardened wax seal. The cork, which was not vintage branded, looked antique enough and pushed right down into the bottle at the first pressure of the corkscrew. All very strange. Inside the bottle, a more full-bodied wine than one expects from a Lopez crianza, not that 1961 is a typical vintage.
    The first aroma is of fishmarket, but this blows off to reveal just a bit of dark, brooding fruit. Good weight on the palate but no bloom. A well-stored specimen with a sounder cork would likely taste much fresher. Imported by Vieux Vins, so must have come from Rare Wine Co., though I can't remember for sure. Among the questions I forgot to ask at the winery is why so many bottles seem reconditioned or otherwise altered. Certainly nobody would bother faking a crianza, so what's up?

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews: