2006 Shafer Cabernet Sauvignon Hillside Select

Community Tasting Notes (144) Avg Score: 94.2 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Experienced palate's profile
  • Report Issue

  2/28/2024 - Experienced palate Likes this wine: 93 Points

  PNP still aromatic with black fruit and cassis on the nose. This restaurant I might mention (Jose Andres Agua Viva} had small glasses with a big corkage of $45. Mouth coating as a full-bodied wine with great balance throughout with a medium long finish. Kinda abusive to drink such a good wine under poor circumstances but it was a very nice wine. Final comments after 90 minutes; this wine still has some more time at it’s peak but don’t wait, it is drinking fine. Cheers

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View sfwinelover1's profile
  • Report Issue

  2/9/2024 - sfwinelover1 Likes this wine: 97 Points

  From a vertical (this, a previously consumed ‘04 and a ‘05, average of $210, but this presumably the cheapest based on WS prices) about 4 years ago. On the nose and palate, classic HSS notes of cassis, dark cherries, tobacco, red licorice, dark roast coffee, dark chocolate, wet soil, oak and vanilla and lighter notes of black currants, dark berries, forest floor, tar, and a bitter, tannic green-Amaro note (which was actually quite pleasing to me as a counter to the general (slight) sweetness of the wine. Dark purple to the point of blackness, full bodied with exposure to air, thick legs. Medium+ tannins, medium- acidity, no heat. Great complexity, VG+ intensity and persistence with aeration. I’ve been an intermittent drinker of this bottling for 30+ years—even when I drank cheaper wines, this, along with others like Peter Michael LP, Merryvale Profile, Montebello, Montelena, Heitz Martha’s, etc. were my splurges—and have never had one which was less than excellent, and many have been great. But this was worrisome out of the bottle. It had the classic HSS profile on the nose and front palate, but dropped off and flattened thereafter, presenting as more of a low 90s wine than the mid to upper 90s drink I’ve been accustomed to. This vintage is relatively low ranked, both for this and more generally (although I’m not accord with the latter, and with time, the former either), and although I chose this over several other vintages I have based on great recent TNs, I wondered if this would be a low water mark for me. Anyway, after leaving this for about 2 and a half hours to see if it could pull itself together, which I wasn’t terribly optimistic about, since, particularly for CA wines, filling out with aeration feels much less likely than alcohol, oakiness, tannins or acidity integrating, it filled out beautifully, becoming significantly deeper and longer, and it continued to do so through night 2, so that the last glass was best. Even at that point, though, this version of HSS relies, relatively, more on elegance and balance than power, more like the ‘97 I had a year and a half ago than the ‘04 and the ‘09. As with the other versions, this is a standout on its own, but shone at least equally brightly with a grilled pork chop and veggies and worked with scampi another night as well. The initial performance was so out of conformance with bottles from other vintages, as well as other TNs, that it muddies my aeration and drinking guidance, but based on how it drank after air, it’s ready now, but the vibrancy at the end of night 2 indicates that it will keep, if not improve, for years to come. While this cuvee is generally well-scored on CT, it doesn’t have the glow of more cult bottlings, perhaps because it’s been around for decades, is (relatively) mass produced and is hardly cheap, but I think that decades on, it merits its consistently high critic scores, and if it’s not a qpr home run for me in the way that old Larkmead LMVs, QCs and Ovids are, it isn’t, in the stilted math of 21st century, not obviously overpriced, either. Strong showing here, right with or above the Morlet Estate, Abreu Cappella, and Riverain, if a hair below the ‘08 Ovid (but above the ‘05 and ‘06 versions). 96-97

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (3)

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View alanmspieg's profile
  • Report Issue

  1/10/2024 - alanmspieg Likes this wine: 98 Points

  This is truly a breautiful wine. I have verticals going back to 2006 and I am beginning to drink them. We had this two nights ago with a bourbon-marinated tri-tip and it was perfect. The wine has a beautiful dark color. I decanted for an hour and it was just about right. Still continued to open up as we drank it with dinner. It is a great drinking wine - very approachable and not over the top tannins. It feels like it is at it’s peak - if you have any in your cellar, I would suggest drinking it over the next 6-12 months, as I don’t feel it will improve any more.

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (5)

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Roi Vin de LBC's profile
  • Report Issue

  3/31/2023 - Roi Vin de LBC wrote: 98 Points

  98 points. 10th dating anniversary at Ospi. Such a beautiful wine. This was my ‘ah ha’ wine 6 years ago. It’s so well structured. Bold but light on its feet. Beautiful leather, aged fruit. It’s pricy but worth every sip.

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View bobadopolis's profile
  • Report Issue

  3/12/2023 - bobadopolis Likes this wine: 96 Points

  Not sure it needed the 2 hour decant, as this was spectacular on opening, but don't think it hurt either. Ridiculously delicious.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 144 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.