cloudy and oxidized.even that you can see richness from hot vintage. some prunes, walnuts and yeasty notes. I believe bottle was bad as during the same tasting 1955 was so fresh. even 1928 was still holding extremely well
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
5/5/2017 - fcxj wrote: 92 Points
Oxidative, but richness still there.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/5/2013 - Clos & Cru wrote:
cloudy and oxidized.even that you can see richness from hot vintage. some prunes, walnuts and yeasty notes. I believe bottle was bad as during the same tasting 1955 was so fresh. even 1928 was still holding extremely well
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment