Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(2)

  1. vin0vin0

    vin0vin0

    1,305 Tasting Notes

  2. BradboBaggins

    BradboBaggins

    358 Tasting Notes

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (21) Avg Score: 90 points

  • Stone fruit, akin to an apricot flesh and pit quality. I also got what I jotted down both in the aromatic and palate as brewed coffee. Roasted fruit, touch of tar and some heat. This is a burlier version of Carlisle and as I think about where Mike's wines have evolved to, I recall the 2016 Piner Olivet Ranches bottle I had earlier this week. While a decade separates these wines, what cannot be disregarded is that the shift in the balance and weight is clearly evident. Good to reminisce with the older stuff but I clearly like the new era wines from Mike far better.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Was a bit anxious about this one since it was a gift from a neighbor/friend and storage was questionable. Initial taste on opening was that this was a bit "hot", which at 15.8% abv wasn't unexpected. Visual inspection showed only slight bricking on the rim with a nice ruby core. On the nose is more heat and some smoke and dry earth. After 1-2 hour decant the alcohol has blown off a bit. There is ripe black cherry along with a hint of leafiness (?), baking spice, very ripe green plum, medium acidity and medium fine grained tannins that sit for a good while on the sides of the tongue.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • The nose showed rich raspberry jam, hints of vanilla and herbs. On the palate, I found red brambly fruit, spices and a hint of cola. The finish was pleasant, long and fresh.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • 15.9% ABV. Translucent dark garnet in the glass. Sweet smelling nose of raisin and red berry fruit. Medium full bodied with fruit that echoes the nose plus a little mulberry and a touch of tea creeping suggesting this is on the downhill side of maturity, but still drinking pretty well. Tasty.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • I agree with the brambly-ness comment about this wine, but it doesn't knock my socks off. This is a very good wine hitting a very good stride though, with lots of berries and dry graphite and a very slight hint of zinny sweetness. I can't emphasize enough though that while theres enough jam to know this is zin, it is totally restrained and fits wonderfully with the still large but entirely integrated tannins. The only drawbacks are that it isn't very complex and theres a touch of heat in there (15.8 alcohol), but all in all, a very good wine at a very good place. Drink now through 2013.

    Second Day: More integrated, this could actually improve with perhaps another year or two. Still a big but pretty balanced wine, nothing new to taste, just better integrated. Score adjusted to a 92 from a 91. Drink now through 2015 and perhaps beyond?

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 21 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2005, IWC Issue #120, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Carlisle Winery Zinfandel Sonoma County) Login and sign up and see review text.

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    2/5/2007, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 84 points

    (Carlisle Zinfandel Sonoma County) Group's #3 (my #6) – 43 pts; 0, 4, 2, 0 – black violet color; nice plummy, cherry nose with caramel oak; another hot and jammy palate, plum; hot short-medium finish 84+ pts.

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and RJonWine.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×