Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(4)

  1. aChave

    aChave

    2,071 Tasting Notes

  2. JeffGMorris

    JeffGMorris

    2,002 Tasting Notes

  3. western

    western

    2,790 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (35) Avg Score: 93.6 points

  • Blind - guessed ‘96 Vilmart for the ‘95 and thought the ‘96 was a ‘08 Cristal.

    Tasted the 95 and 96 blind side by side. What a contrast, as FMII said, “vintage matters”.

    ‘95 is much darker, a brass color while the ‘96 is bright and youthful.

    ‘95 aromas of bruised apple while the ‘96 leans towards green and red apple.

    95 palate of apple and yellow pear with a good zip of acid at the finish. ‘96, wow is this fresh and vibrant with red apple on the attack and then angular lemon and great acid. Good concentration.

    When the bags were pulled and I saw the label I thought “WTF are these!” LOL awesome treat.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • We did the 1995 and 1996 together. They were served blind to the group (although I brought the 1995 so not blind to me). The 1996 showed a savory aroma, what Steve called 'old brie', which I thought was spot on. In terms of freshness, both had plenty of that quality, notable for these two wines that are already 25+ years old. And the colors on these were fine, with maybe a touch of gold on each but still fresh in color, too. My own assessment was that the 1995 was more composed and seamless, with golden apple, and what Brig called apple pie spice. And in the 1995, the apple, peaches/stone fruit was showing nicely and the acidity of tangerine was more complementary that dominant. In contrast, the 1996 shows a distinct imprint of lime acidity, plus the chalk and the green apple much more zesty and brighter than the yellow apple of the 1995. And the 1996 has a candied orange chew finish. In sum, to me both delicious but the vintage shows when side by side, and for me the 1995 more composed and integrated and the 1996 brighter and edgier.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Fantastic. Clean, elegant.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Last bottle!

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • So thick you could cut it with a knife, but through it all retains a strong line of acid to keep it lively. Youthful and with little secondary development. Absolutely lavish in style but not sloppy. Still, it strikes me as more yummy than profound.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 35 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Champagne Warrior

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    November/December 2003, IWC Issue #111, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Vilmart et Cie. Cuvee Creation Vintage) Login and sign up and see review text.

NOTE: Some content is property of Champagne Warrior and Vinous.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×