This bottle was much better than the first, which was flawed. Still has a much darker golden color than would be anticipated from a wine of this region and age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
A better showing than the last bottle, but still a deep golden color. On the nose, could pick up some citrus fruit as well as hints of vanilla and oak. On the palate, came up short of what I would expect from a 10 year old SA. Overall, a slight disappointment.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
6/16/2008 - Slackt wrote: 75 Points
This bottle was much better than the first, which was flawed. Still has a much darker golden color than would be anticipated from a wine of this region and age.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/15/2008 - The Drunken Cyclist wrote: 84 Points
A better showing than the last bottle, but still a deep golden color. On the nose, could pick up some citrus fruit as well as hints of vanilla and oak. On the palate, came up short of what I would expect from a 10 year old SA. Overall, a slight disappointment.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/14/2008 - The Drunken Cyclist wrote: 80 Points
Dark golden color, a little scary. Nose was not off, however, but no fruit whatsoever. On the palate, still no fruit, but not quite off.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/13/2008 - Slackt wrote: flawed
This color of this wine had turned very dark, and has gone bad.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
5/19/2007 - The Drunken Cyclist wrote: 89 Points
Started off way too cold. As it warmed, citrus and buttery notes. Great finish.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment