Didn't realize when purchasing (17 Jan 16) that it was a 2011 vintage.
The wine was definitely flat and muted through the middle and had a very sharp strange flavor in the finish. A bad aftertaste that might have been cork taint. I didn't pick up a strong corked aroma but the odd taste might have been a bit of corking.
I think if i was a couple years younger this might have been a pretty nice wine, but in 2016 I could definitely tell it was well past its prime.
Due to the unintended age of the wine I'm not giving a numerical score as it would be an unfair assessment.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Cabbage, toast, butterscotch. Salty, oaky palate, not much fruit, plenty of oak but little else. Decent finish but it could have done with more fruit and acidity.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Lite reduktiv i doften, typ brända tändstickor. Vädrades ur efter en stund. Nötter, mandel, blodgrape och gula äpplen. Knappt medelfyllig, måttliga syror och en liten beska i den inte alltför långa eftersmaken.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Chateau Ste. Michelle Chardonnay Columbia Valley) Very lightly aromatic with grass, toasty oak, banana, and spice. The palate has a broad feel with light fruit flavors accented by wood spices. 100% Chardonnay. 13% tank fermented. Aged seven months in French and American oak (13% new). 13.5% alcohol. Sample provided by winery.
NOTE: Some content is property of Washington Wine Report.
1/17/2016 - Thrstn wrote:
Didn't realize when purchasing (17 Jan 16) that it was a 2011 vintage.
The wine was definitely flat and muted through the middle and had a very sharp strange flavor in the finish. A bad aftertaste that might have been cork taint. I didn't pick up a strong corked aroma but the odd taste might have been a bit of corking.
I think if i was a couple years younger this might have been a pretty nice wine, but in 2016 I could definitely tell it was well past its prime.
Due to the unintended age of the wine I'm not giving a numerical score as it would be an unfair assessment.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
11/8/2015 - dwaynelm Likes this wine: 84 Points
Oak overwhelms this one. There's some underlying green apple and lemon trying to get out. Balanced acidity.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/16/2014 - dwaynelm Likes this wine: 86 Points
Basic chardonnay with a high end amount of oak. Good value.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/5/2014 - Timbalimba wrote: 84 Points
Cabbage, toast, butterscotch. Salty, oaky palate, not much fruit, plenty of oak but little else. Decent finish but it could have done with more fruit and acidity.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/1/2014 - larseman wrote: 84 Points
Lite reduktiv i doften, typ brända tändstickor. Vädrades ur efter en stund. Nötter, mandel, blodgrape och gula äpplen.
Knappt medelfyllig, måttliga syror och en liten beska i den inte alltför långa eftersmaken.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment