Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(13)

  1. Bernt Olav

    Bernt Olav

    862 Tasting Notes

  2. Joe P

    Joe P

    1 Tasting Note

  3. wynnewood500

    wynnewood500

    529 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (192) Avg Score: 90.2 points

  • My fifth and final bottle, and by far the best of the bunch. A pop and pour, this had slight oxidative traits on the nose and palate which quickly were pushed to the back ground as a lovely red cherry fruit quality emerged, almost like a fine aged Sangiovese with just a little less acidity. Additional air brought a little saddle leather and a small touch of bacon, but this remained and its core, a very refined and elegant wine. I’m really surprised at how much life there appears to be left in this bottle, though I think we all know that Guigals bottle variation can really make it tricky in assessing a life span. Nonetheless, this was a fine wine and a real treat to drink this 16 year old wine on this overcast, relaxing Sunday afternoon.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • David's: spicy blackberry at first, slight blueberry, but not fresh--with blackpepper, dried herbs. A bit harsh on the palate after about 10 minutes, somewhat dried out, past its prime. Last bottle, ok with hamburgers, but needed more fruit.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Farge: rød til brunrød. Aroma av baconfett, plomme, blåbær, svak pepper, mm. I munnen er den medium fyldig og relativt myk, men har nok syre/tannin i bakgrunnen til at den fungerer godt sammen med mat. Saftig anslag og tørrer fra midten av smakskurven og ut. God vin, men mangler litt på å bli ordentlig engasjerende. Fungerte godt til grillet kylling og and.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Seems a bit sour and stewed on the nose, with aromas of acidic fruit, with a slight hint of acetone. A bit sweet on the palate, with hints of milk chocolate. This is not holding up very well. Did not get better with time. I don't think it is a bad bottle. Just wine that did not age well. I initially had a low score on this, but have removed it as it might be this was an off bottle. I have four more, so am looking forward to trying them to see if this is an anomaly or not!

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comments (1)

  • my last note applies perfectly, unfortunately i only read it once i had decanted at 2pm, on the pnp this was nice with straight up syrah fruit and a touch of spice, put back in bottle two hours later and went to bridge match, by 6pm fruit had faded and it was mostly oak-water, heavy and not enjoyable… maybe leave for ten years but my bet is this is best served soon and without any decant

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 192 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JancisRobinson.com

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    January/February 2003, IWC Issue #106, (See more on Vinous...)

    (E. Guigal Cote Rotie Brune et Blonde) Subscribe to see review text.

NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Vinous.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by wine-searcher.com
×