Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(2)

  1. Mrbuzz

    Mrbuzz

    1,880 Tasting Notes

  2. CamWheeler

    CamWheeler

    7,991 Tasting Notes

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (14) Avg Score: 93.3 points

  • The Eleventh Annual Stonefields Dinner (Guelph, ON, Canada): From magnum, deep gold colour. Nose is very powerful with quite complex flavours of hazelnuts, ginger, bruised apple, biscuit, spice and minerals. The palate had a subtle sherried note with bruised apple, minerals, earth, spice and an almost mushroom note. The finish was very long but to me was missing some of the complexity and power that I have come to associate with Krug and specifically this bottle. I had the 1976 from magnum in the fall of 2011 and I was over the moon scoring it 97 points.
    My hunch is that this experience only further underscores the adage "there are no great wines, only great bottles" as the 1976 Krug is undoubtedly one of the best champagnes that I have ever tasted.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Once in Lifetime...: From magnum, popped and poured, deep golden colour in the glass. On first pour, tons of micro bubbles remain, however, these dissipate within the first few minutes. This shows an oxidative nose of bruised apple, earth, spice, yeast, crushed rocks, toasted hazelnuts, toffee, and some sherry type notes. The second bottle shows a little more advanced with the earthy notes in the forefront, with a bit of undergrowth and mushroom. On the palate, this is still quite rich, with terrific acidity that is very refreshing. The finish is long, and is accentuated by notes of bruised apples, mineral, hazelnut and spice. Other people really loved this, but for my preference, this was on the downward slide; I prefer my Champagne much more youthful and vibrant.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Like the 90 served alongside, but more intense in all parameters. Toast, caramel, nuts, with a palate very complex. Still nice acid. Great wine.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • S.F....La Paulee style! (S.F. Ca.): So great to try this...plenty fresh lemon citrus, tiny bubbles, to go along with the strawberry farm cream, nuttiness.....very complex...but the sherryness got to me at the end of the glass...wanted to go back to the '90!

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Nutty, toast. Great depth of flavor with very good acidity.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 14 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Champagne Warrior

View From the Cellar

Vinous

  • By Antonio Galloni
    9th Annual Wine Dinner and Auction to Benefit The Mount Sinai Hospital (Feb 2012), (See more on Vinous...)

    (Krug Vintage (magnum)) Subscribe to see review text.

Vintage Tastings

  • By John Kapon
    Tasting of the Year, Part II, 8/17/2012 93 points

    (Krug) Day Two of the Tasting of the Year began quietly with a 1976 Krug, following an oxidized 1962 I believe. The nose on the Krug was lightly toasty with golden fruit, wafer, sugar and light petillance. The palate was creamy and tasty but on the mature side for a 1976. There were some comments about 1976 starting to turn the corner for Champagne (93).
  • By John Kapon
    Spontaneous Combustion, 5/9/2011 92 points

    (Krug) There was also Champagne. I don’t think there is a proper meal that can go without it. We started with a 1976 Krug. Its nose was wafery with a light brulee glaze along with and nice wheat and a light toast. The palate was leaner than expected, possessing light cola and ginger ale flavors. Of course, any reference to New York’s finest collectors without a reference to Big Boy would constitute an incomplete grade, and he commented how 1976 isn’t even close to 1979 despite a few high profile wines having similar ratings. Its vanilla components came out with some foccacia, but it was merely very good, and excellence is usually the minimum that Krug will tolerate (92).
  • By John Kapon
    Monday Night Football, 12/9/2009 96 points

    (Krug) It was Krug’s turn, beginning with the 1976 Krug. It was similar to the ’73 DP in its stony and minerally personality, but ‘heavier’ per Bruce and ‘a little dusty.’ It had the signature Krug vanilla cream on top of everything. Its palate was big and rich, heavy being a good way to put it. The ’76 was full, long and in charge with lots of straw and hay flavors. Its power really impressed (96).
  • By John Kapon
    Cellar Raiding, Hollywood Style, 7/9/2006 95 points

    (Krug) The Krug had a great, toasty nose with bready and caramel overtones, great seltzer, and a rich and creamy profile. Dalia noted 'strawberry flavors' and was 100% correct. There were also caramel flavors, nice grit, and the bubbly was long and balanced, perhaps on a plateau but still with some ascension to it. It was in a really good spot; its acidity was long and fine, and it was rich, meaty, toasty and full of white meat and oil flavors. Rudy gave it '5 stars'
  • By John Kapon
    A Double Dose of the ROPP, 7/5/2006 95 points

    (Krug) birth year of the Doctor. It had a nutty nose with great bread, caramel and white chocolate aromas and was amazingly fresh and toasty. The palate was racy and vivacious, full of zesty bubbles and acidity. There were mineral flavors and kiss of citrus rind that expanded on its rocky finish. This outstanding Champagne also got earthier in its nose

NOTE: Some content is property of Champagne Warrior and View From the Cellar and Vinous and Vintage Tastings.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by wine-searcher.com
×