2012 Acacia Pinot Noir A By Acacia

Community Tasting Notes (18) Avg Score: 85.3 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View OliverHM's profile
  • Report Issue

  1/21/2015 - OliverHM wrote: 79 Points

  Terrible!

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Dan L's profile
  • Report Issue

  11/17/2014 - Dan L wrote: 84 Points

  Not as good as the last bottle. I picked up a bit of astringency or something that made it taste just a touch off. It’s still a good bottle to keep around, especially for only $10. I couldn't imagine other grocery-store Pinots at the $10 price point being as good.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Dan L's profile
  • Report Issue

  9/3/2014 - Dan L Likes this wine: 85 Points

  This was a nice Pinot, and a good choice when you're looking for a lighter wine for lighter meals. I probably wouldn't choose this to serve to guests, but it was worth the $10 for a mid-week dinner wine. I enjoyed the 2010 a bit more, but it also had more cellar time than this 2012. It is certainly better than most other California Pinots at this price point.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Boutip's profile
  • Report Issue

  8/21/2014 - Boutip Likes this wine: 88 Points

  Light raspberry jam notes with some light tannin. Texture is not as smooth as I would have expected. Well balanced overall with some complexity.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View cphd's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/23/2014 - cphd Likes this wine: 88 Points

  Good fruit, full body, better now, great value

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 18 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.