I am always tempted to rate Tahbilk wines 6/10 just to keep the auction prices down! This wine is not one of the great wines in the world, but it is certainly a great wine bargain! I have never paid more than $16 a bottle for it (usually $12), and I never touch them at less that 15 years of age. This followed up a 1996 389. Compared to that, the Tahbilk was all vibrant fruit! Perhaps it was a bit unfair. The Tahbilk could have appeared more complex first up. But I would say this is a pure and simple wine. Absolutely delightful with (dare I say) elegance and balance, and decent length. I would pretty much back up what Xavier said, in the details on nose and palate, although I did not notice any metallic taste. Just bright berry fruits with some leather and cedar around the edges.
Base of neck, good cork (half wet but not soaked through) extracted without difficulty. A blend of 90% Cabernet-Sauvignon and 10% Cabernet Franc, eighteen months in French oak, 12% ABV. Light to medium deep colour, mature but lively appearance; fresh and vibrant nose, crushed red berries, forest floor, spices and cedar, slightly metallic; the palate is light but vibrant, with firm but slightly metallic acidity and almost completely resolved tannins, mature but juicy red berry fruit; good resonance and length. Very lively for age. The acidity is starting to separate, but overall a very nice surprise. Drink up.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
11/7/2021 - BillyfromOz wrote: 90 Points
I am always tempted to rate Tahbilk wines 6/10 just to keep the auction prices down! This wine is not one of the great wines in the world, but it is certainly a great wine bargain! I have never paid more than $16 a bottle for it (usually $12), and I never touch them at less that 15 years of age. This followed up a 1996 389. Compared to that, the Tahbilk was all vibrant fruit! Perhaps it was a bit unfair. The Tahbilk could have appeared more complex first up. But I would say this is a pure and simple wine. Absolutely delightful with (dare I say) elegance and balance, and decent length. I would pretty much back up what Xavier said, in the details on nose and palate, although I did not notice any metallic taste. Just bright berry fruits with some leather and cedar around the edges.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)
9/21/2020 - Xavier Auerbach wrote: 90 Points
Base of neck, good cork (half wet but not soaked through) extracted without difficulty. A blend of 90% Cabernet-Sauvignon and 10% Cabernet Franc, eighteen months in French oak, 12% ABV. Light to medium deep colour, mature but lively appearance; fresh and vibrant nose, crushed red berries, forest floor, spices and cedar, slightly metallic; the palate is light but vibrant, with firm but slightly metallic acidity and almost completely resolved tannins, mature but juicy red berry fruit; good resonance and length. Very lively for age. The acidity is starting to separate, but overall a very nice surprise. Drink up.
1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment