I got one in an auction recently for cheap and got out of curiosity.
I was quite impressed, quite a nice wine. Acidity holding things together nicely, soft tanins very resolved now. All forest floor, dry earth and mushrooms now.
Pre 2000’s was before Chilean wines entered what I think was a more over extracted, high yields era. This is one of the nicest CS with evolution that I’ve had from Chile (and I’ve had plenty), really reminded me of an old school made left bank claret.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Hanging in there - alcohol is a little pronounced but there is some interesting complexity on the nose and palate and some cassis and mint flavours still remain. Proves that Chilean can age - more recent vintages will probably cellar even better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Note: This has the "D.O. SANTA CRUZ ALPALTA VINEYARD" designation on the front label. Alcohol: 13.5%, Barrel Aging: 12 months in new French Oak Color: Dark Ruby center, 3 cm orange/brick rim Body/Texture: medium-full Aroma/Bouquet: Day 1: Closed, slight dark berry, smoke and earth. Day 2: Opened up. Cassis (dried berries?), strong blue cheese and funky earth, sublte smoke, and wood. Day 3: Blue cheese has disappeared. Earth, smoke, toasted oak, violet Flavor: Day 1: undefined fruit Day 2: Raspberry, blackberry with blue cheese on mid-palate. Nice 25-30 second berry finish Day 3: Blue cheese has morphed into earth plus cocoa. Complexity/Balance: Well integrated. Good fruit, still some acidity and (mostly) tamed, but substantial tannins. Complex. Overall Impression: Best on day 3. An outstanding wine. Cellaring Potential: Drink now if you like to have some powerful, though aged, fruit flavors along with earthy characteristics.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
12/11/2023 - MrGando wrote: 90 Points
I got one in an auction recently for cheap and got out of curiosity.
I was quite impressed, quite a nice wine. Acidity holding things together nicely, soft tanins very resolved now. All forest floor, dry earth and mushrooms now.
Pre 2000’s was before Chilean wines entered what I think was a more over extracted, high yields era. This is one of the nicest CS with evolution that I’ve had from Chile (and I’ve had plenty), really reminded me of an old school made left bank claret.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/13/2010 - margsinc wrote: 93 Points
great wine, very smooth
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/14/2009 - vespasian wrote: 87 Points
Hanging in there - alcohol is a little pronounced but there is some interesting complexity on the nose and palate and some cassis and mint flavours still remain. Proves that Chilean can age - more recent vintages will probably cellar even better.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/1/2006 - wombat wrote: 92 Points
Note: This has the "D.O. SANTA CRUZ ALPALTA VINEYARD" designation on the front label.
Alcohol: 13.5%, Barrel Aging: 12 months in new French Oak Color: Dark Ruby center, 3 cm orange/brick rim Body/Texture: medium-full
Aroma/Bouquet:
Day 1: Closed, slight dark berry, smoke and earth.
Day 2: Opened up. Cassis (dried berries?), strong blue cheese and funky earth, sublte smoke, and wood.
Day 3: Blue cheese has disappeared. Earth, smoke, toasted oak, violet
Flavor:
Day 1: undefined fruit
Day 2: Raspberry, blackberry with blue cheese on mid-palate. Nice 25-30 second berry finish
Day 3: Blue cheese has morphed into earth plus cocoa.
Complexity/Balance: Well integrated. Good fruit, still some acidity and (mostly) tamed, but substantial tannins. Complex.
Overall Impression: Best on day 3. An outstanding wine.
Cellaring Potential: Drink now if you like to have some powerful, though aged, fruit flavors along with earthy characteristics.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
4/24/2002 - cigar52 wrote: 87 Points
good underlying body and taste...covered somewhat with tannins...could be a 88 in a year or two
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment