Lacks depth. Shows old vintage characteristics and isn't bad. Just lacks depth. Tried 3 different 1994s, DuCru, Montrose and this and all lacked depth. Must be a vintage thing.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Garnet colour with a little maber at the rim. Subdued nose, a bit of red fruits and a few curranty notes. Showing some maturity, a bit lean, not a great deal of character. Modest claret flavours.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Not much show of age in the color and still quite tannic. While this is an enjoyable wine and a relatively good deal at $30, I don't think that I would purchase it again.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
12/14/2023 - Wangenhome wrote:
OK- 12.2023
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
7/5/2015 - sunalsorises wrote: 86 Points
Lacks depth. Shows old vintage characteristics and isn't bad. Just lacks depth. Tried 3 different 1994s, DuCru, Montrose and this and all lacked depth. Must be a vintage thing.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
2/8/2009 - kevin h wrote: 86 Points
Garnet colour with a little maber at the rim. Subdued nose, a bit of red fruits and a few curranty notes. Showing some maturity, a bit lean, not a great deal of character. Modest claret flavours.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/26/2007 - Rob MacKay wrote: 85 Points
Not much show of age in the color and still quite tannic. While this is an enjoyable wine and a relatively good deal at $30, I don't think that I would purchase it again.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment