Took to dinner at the Tam O'Shanter. No formal notes, but I found this a bit underwhelming. This was a classic claret that paired well with prime rib. Still, I felt like it was lacking in nose, fruit, and exuberance, particularly given the vintage. Perhaps it is in a closed stage? I'm certainly willing to give another try, but would have scored this bottle in the mid- to high- 80s based on the showing tonight.
I opened this tonight just to see where it is in its evolution. While it is still a pup,it is actually more approachable than the 2000 vintage which I had a year ago. Nose is expressive with licorice, cedar, eucalyptus / menthol and spice with a touch of iron/beef blood. The fruit is concentrated with plum, black cherry that is slightly overripe, but not overdone. Tannin is firm, but surprisingly approachable with food. I won't open another for at least five years, but this was fun to try at the age of 12. Decanted and enjoy over the course of 3 hours.
still brooding and way too young to properly assess. Dark black berry fruit and hints of licorice and cedar enveloped in a wall of tannin. Some Ceylon spices notes appeared as it aired out in the glass during the event. Long finish. Revisit in 5+ years.
Nice, deep sombre colour, some bricking round the edges. Decent mature nose, some tertiary leafy elements, nothing really special or refined. Smooth attack, very dry taste, slightly bitter, quite a whack of tannins left. Lacks fruit. Reminds me of what grand crus used to taste like in the 70'ies and 80'ies, before Michel Rolland e.a. It'll grow softer, won't die on you this year or the next, but is basically showing all it has.
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
A pristine parcel of this is floating around the US at a seriously reduced tarriff and it's an original cellar lot. If you ever wondered what 1966 Latour tasted like in youth (or even something like 1900 Margaux), this style has gone by the wayside but it should win out in the end. Wasn't Bordeaux supposed to be unfriendly and tannic after bottling? When did Bordeaux become easy to drink a month after venturing into its vessel? I'm not sure I want St. Estephe to be easy to drink in youth - I would prefer the message in the bottle to reveal itself when it feels ready to wash ashore.
This is a wine and format I am quite certain will be worth far more than its present rate if given the requisite cellar time. As the 2005s become harder to find (and as they start to age), magnums and large format will most certainly increase in value. Calon-Segur was one of the top examples of the vintage from the get-go (there was a period where it toyed with WOTV honors while aging in barrel) and only a severely closed state at the final bottle tastings prevented it from scoring among the top-tier of the vintage (1986 Las Cases was also severely closed at the final bottle tastings so keep that in mind). I will be shocked if the scores for this wine stay even close to this (you can check the original barrel scores - the wine should be in that range or higher when all is said and done) - a top buy for a magnum at this point and a potential investment:
VERY HIGHLY RECOMMENDED - one of the highest recommendations of the vintage:
2005 Calon Segur 1.5lt (St. Estephe)
STRICT LIMIT 6/person until we run out
...we also have a few of these - also interesting but I believe the 2005 will prevail in a decade (and the 2005 vintage will be more valuable as a whole in time):
2003 Calon Segur 1.5lt (St. Estephe)
STRICT LIMIT 6/person until we run out
Both arrive with impeccable provenance at some point this fall (they are on the water now). They will ship during the first available shipping window (weather permitting).
Jon Rimmerman Garagiste Seattle, WA
NOTE: Some content is property of View From the Cellar and JancisRobinson.com and The World of Fine Wine and Vinous and Garagiste.