Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(42)

  1. popasq

    popasq

    485 Tasting Notes

  2. Personal Opinion

    Personal Opinion

    231 Tasting Notes

  3. peterseville

    peterseville

    260 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (105) Avg Score: 90.9 points

  • Very consistent with the bottle i opened a few days ago, this was most people's favorite bottle of the night. This is excellent but would likely dring this sooner than later.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Excellent, not sure if this has not seen its peak.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Opposed to the pronounced California fruit forwardness that others seem to be remarking on, this is exactly how I remember it when I tried it 2014.. still dominated by whole cluster overtones. Albeit more developed now, though very much in line with my initial impressions years ago. Bright acid will likely provide a number of years of life still.. regardless, it’s developed and drinking well now. Initial overtones of dried herbs, tomatoe leaf, roasted root vegetables and soil dominate the nose, which slowly give way to buried layers of dark cranberry, and very subtle florals with air. On the palate, the wine first feels smooth and expansive.. medium bodied.. than a burst of acidity takes hold and flavors of cranberry, orange rind, grapefruit and spice rush in.. only to be replaced with lingering layers of tomatoe leaf, soil and roasted root vegetables in the long finish. Subtle damp neutral barrel and whole cluster aromas remain in the empty glass. Very nice. While I could have waited to open my single bottle, it’s exactly what I was craving.. earthy, bright, whole cluster goodness. The wine becomes more subtly integrated with time, while still showing all the same nuances and complexities. Brighter acid keeps the entire wine in check and leaner overall. Paired 8/10 with mushroom risotto. 10/10 with plain steamed Red Swiss Chard!! Great synergy with chard! No complaints :)

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Simply stunning

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • very pinot, very California pinot, it seemed about in the middle ground between the lighter, more delicate styles and the bigger ones. Nice wine, but did not wow

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 105 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JancisRobinson.com

Burghound

JancisRobinson.com

Vinous

  • By Josh Raynolds
    Focus on Santa Barbara County (Dec 2014), 12/1/2014, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Domaine De La Cote Pinot Noir Sta. Rita Hills Sta. Rita Hills) Login and sign up and see review text.
  • By Antonio Galloni
    Santa Barbara: The Thrill of Discovery (Jul 2014), (See more on Vinous...)

    (Domaine De La Côte Pinot Noir Sta. Rita Hills Sta. Rita Hills) Login and sign up and see review text.

i-WineReview.com

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    12/11/2014, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 91 points

    (Domaine de la Côte Pinot Noir Sta. Rita Hills) Medium dark ruby color; savory, earthy, tart raspberry, pine needles, forest floor nose; silky textured, tart raspberry, mineral, forest floor, cranberry palate with medium acidity; could use 2-3 years; medium-plus finish (50% whole cluster; 12.5% alcohol) 91+ points

NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Burghound and Vinous and i-WineReview.com and RJonWine.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×