Who Likes This Wine(1)

  1. Filippo


    335 Tasting Notes

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (5) Avg Score: 89.3 points

  • Perfect now! Drinking beautifully already upon opening. Nice red fruit and well integrated oak. Medium to light body.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Not quite at the same level as I recall from shortly after release. Concentrated red cherry and raspberry with some new oak spice still quite prominent. Similar fruit flavors with a slightly underripe character, followed by lots of minerality and good acidity. Some sharp elbows.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • So, I finally caught some greenies. I haven't had a ton, but a half dozen or so 1ers the past year or so have been good to me. This one, green, overtly tart, medicinal and volatile. Despite a somewhat alluring nose, I really struggled to get through one glass. Too bad, but my first obviously not right '04.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • The 1999 vintage of this wine was an oaky disaster, but people kept insisting that Perrot-Minot had gotten better in this department and that I wouldn't say the same of the newer wines. The 2004 is not really the oaky disaster that the 1999 was, but oak is nevertheless the dominant flavor here and it ruins what could have been a Musignyesque wine, based on the sappy, satiny texture of the first few sips before the oak contagion really went malignant. Unlike the 1999, the oak here doesn't dry out the wine and leave raw wood and sawdust in its wake; instead it just tarts up the fruit with an intense brown-sugar malted-milkshake sweetness - all the way on the sweet end of the oak flavor spectrum with none of the spice. So it may be the *kind* of oak that's the issue here as much as the amount. This is not *vastly* more dominated by oak than the 2004 Clos des Lambrays, for example, but the oakspice of the Lambrays was enticing whereas here the malted makeup is just tiring. And it's a shame because the fruit underneath is just gorgeous, totally svelte and alluringly feminine in true Musignyesque fashion with none of the greenness nor even any of the acidic edginess of the 2004 vintage. This could easily pass for a 2002. I am almost tempted to buy some more and hope the oak integrates, but that would represent the triumph of hope over experience. Indeed, the leftovers the next day turn undrinkably oaky, with the burnt-coffee roasted character having completely sucked the fruit dry.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Acker 2004 Tasting Part One; 5/2/2009-5/3/2009: pretty sweetness on nose, lighter than the Dujac Charmes tasted just before. earthy on the palate, with puckering tannins that draw you in for another sip. retasted at the end of the tasting, still really nice. not quite as good as the dujac, but not by much - this is a better value.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.


Stephen Tanzer's International Wine Cellar

NOTE: Some content is property of Burghound and Stephen Tanzer's International Wine Cellar.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by