Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(23)

  1. DugyDog

    DugyDog

    75 Tasting Notes

  2. moskito

    moskito

    0 Tasting Notes

  3. dgl7777

    dgl7777

    2 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (276) Avg Score: 91.8 points

  • garnet, no bricking.
    slight brett out of the gate but subdued enough to lend characater to what is a remarkable wine.
    very ripe fruit, cassis liquour, leather, tar and a touch of earthiness (probably the slight brett) very long finish, ending just slightly oxidized which tells me this wine is in a slow decline.
    I'd score this somewhere between 92-94.
    That said, I think this wine was probably drinking better about 5 years ago.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • WCC 1990s California Cabernet Blind Tasting (Dorato's Resturant, Guilderland, NY): [Opened at 1pm for 1.5 hours.] Licorice and black fruit. Long complex ripe licorice finish. Very tasty wine! Group #3 WOTN.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • bright vibrant red jammy fruit - tons left in this 1997

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Still life left in this seventeen year old, medium bodied, vibrant black raspberry, red currants and kirsch flavors highlighted by a layer of tea and hint of caramel and touch of spice on a moderate short light polished tannin finish.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • I bought this on release and it's been sitting in the cellar ever since.

    So what do you bring to a post-funeral gathering, with dear friends, who happen to be wine geeks? Something special, even celebratory, but not in a champagne sort of way. Something weighty, able to stand up to the gravity of the situation, but not in a somber sort of way. Given the notoriety of this one as a Spectator wine of the year (at least according to one of the geeks), and the prime spot this bottle was in ... it served admirably.

    I had worried this one might be past peak, and the cork was a bit crumbly, but it smelled great going into the decanter. It only had 30 minutes or so, because we grew impatient. No discernible bricking. A smooth attack with a jammy rich mix of berry, cedar, (and maybe graphite?) on the delivery. Some tannins were still evident. In fact, two of the tasters called it young. Nicely balanced, showing plenty of fruit, and no heat. High scores from all the geeks. I'm betting if we had a slab of hangar steak grilled up with it, we'd have scored it even higher - but it was wonderful even on it's own.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 276 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

JancisRobinson.com

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2001, IWC Issue #96, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Chateau St. Jean Cabernet Sauvignon Cinq Cepages Sonoma County) Subscribe to see review text.
  • By Stephen Tanzer
    November/December 2000, IWC Issue #93, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Chateau St. Jean Cabernet Sauvignon Cinq Cepages Sonoma County) Subscribe to see review text.

RJonWine.com

  • By Richard Jennings
    1/22/2004, (See more on RJonWine.com...) 92 points

    (Chateau St. Jean Cabernet Sauvignon Cinq CÚpages) Nice blackberry and coffee nose; tasty, coffee-infused black fruit palate with a hint of chocolate; medium finish 92+ pts.

NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Vinous and RJonWine.com.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by wine-searcher.com
×