Who Likes This Wine(34)

  1. TannicBeast


    2,397 Tasting Notes

  2. MMO13


    1 Tasting Note

  3. jmh st louis

    jmh st louis

    1,428 Tasting Notes


Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (200) Avg Score: 91.4 points

  • very dry red.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Color: dark ruby core -> dense ruby rim showing the start of some bricking. Quite the intense bouquet on PnP of leather, black cherry, asphalt and earth, iodine and, interestingly, wet wool. Medium weight on the palate with sour cherries, pepper and minerals. Nice acidity and palate presence but a short to medium-long finish ends too quickly and harshly drying for my taste. Tannic and a little sour, this definitely needs more time to sleep. More upside ahead? Only time will tell.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • This is a remarkable wine and indicative of a great vintage. It benefits from air, air and then some more air. The color is clear, deep, purple with garnet hues on the rim. It appears a lot younger than its stated age. This is a concentrated, glass-staining wine with a considerable amount of sediment. The nose is clean, with baked cherries, sugar plums, baking spices, pine, licorice, coffee and tea leaves. The nose is still developing. The palate is dry with some nice fruit upon entry, medium (+) alcohol (14%), polyphenols and minerality. The acidity is medium (+) and the tannins are medium (+) to pronounced, even after 14 years. This is a medium (+) to full-bodied wine, with medium (+) flavor intensity and long finish. The tannins are still quite noticeable and - thanks to the lively fruit - this bottling appears to have several more years of additional aging potential. A very interesting wine, particularly if you can find it on sale in the $50 range.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Decanted 4 hours. First glass was tight and tannic featuring earth, licorice and oak. Next few glasses really showcased the dark fruits in the wine and it was quite balanced. Medium to long finish and if properly prepared drink now. It also has potential to go another decade.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Had the opportunity to join a tasting with a 6 Liter bottle of this. We had multiple decanters and had a tasting every hour. Tastings after the first hour showed a small improvement each hour. But at the fifth hour the aroma and flavor began to fall off.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 200 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.


  • By Antonio Galloni
    The Noble Wines of Southern Italy (Aug 2010), (See more on Vinous...)

    (Feudi Di San Gregorio Serpico) Subscribe to see review text.

  • By Richard Jennings
    10/18/2010, (See more on 91 points

    (Feudi di San Gregorio Irpinia Serpico) Group's #2 (my #1) – 49 pts.; 3, 1, 1, 0 - opaque purple red violet color; appealing, tart berry, tart plum nose; tight, tasty, tart berry, tart black plum, charcoal, licorice, black plum palate; medium-plus finish 91+ pts.
  • By Richard Jennings
    5/18/2009, (See more on 91 points

    (Feudi di San Gregorio Irpinia Serpico) Group's #6 (my #5) – 80 pts; 2, 1, 3, 3 – dark red violet color; initial mustiness that blew off, ripe black plum and blackberry nose, with a touch of TCA becoming more evident with time; tightish tart black fruit, graphite palate with sweet, firm tannnins; medium finish 91+ pts.

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous and

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by