Deep golden, clearly well matured both in color and whiff. Some acetone on the nose as well. Rich, plum, wood/oak. Initially really sharp, after half an hour og air it turned more succulent yet still being very fresh. Good and well matured wine, but short and relatively linear for an oldie-bubly.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Champagne - 100 Vintage and NV Champagne; 12/15/2015-12/15/2020: During a Paulee dinner, so only brief impressions. From MAG. Glad this gentlemen came around with this nice bottle. Very grand showing with bruised apples, apricot, quince, dried flowers. Wonderful!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Pulled cold from fridge and used Riedel Vinum Champagne flutes. Very pale in color with effusive, tight bubbles. Minerals and yeast on the not overpowering nose. Extremely focused, steely fruit, with a very distinct rocky/mineral (limestone?)flavor that penetrates the upper palate, which is followed by a long and complex yeasty/biscuit-y finish, leaving the mouth in a state of anticipation for the next sip. Big but not overpowering acid. Couldn't detect any wood. Drank it without food, although fresh Oysters would seem right. Cannot stress enough the overall mineral character of this bubbly. Not for those who prefer any sweetness/roundness in their Champagne, but for those of us mineral/acid heads this is nirvana. Was told that almost no dosage is used. Moved up to one of my three favorite bubblies ever.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
6/15/2023 - dearth wrote: 91 Points
Deep golden, clearly well matured both in color and whiff. Some acetone on the nose as well. Rich, plum, wood/oak. Initially really sharp, after half an hour og air it turned more succulent yet still being very fresh. Good and well matured wine, but short and relatively linear for an oldie-bubly.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/17/2020 - Collector1855 wrote: 97 Points
Champagne - 100 Vintage and NV Champagne; 12/15/2015-12/15/2020: During a Paulee dinner, so only brief impressions. From MAG. Glad this gentlemen came around with this nice bottle. Very grand showing with bruised apples, apricot, quince, dried flowers. Wonderful!
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
12/14/2009 - Chidainey wrote: 92 Points
No formal notes. Very vibrant. The quality of the base wine shone through. Good minerality, depth and finish. Ready to drink.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/3/2007 - Chidainey wrote: 93 Points
Pulled cold from fridge and used Riedel Vinum Champagne flutes. Very pale in color with effusive, tight bubbles. Minerals and yeast on the not overpowering nose. Extremely focused, steely fruit, with a very distinct rocky/mineral (limestone?)flavor that penetrates the upper palate, which is followed by a long and complex yeasty/biscuit-y finish, leaving the mouth in a state of anticipation for the next sip. Big but not overpowering acid. Couldn't detect any wood. Drank it without food, although fresh Oysters would seem right. Cannot stress enough the overall mineral character of this bubbly. Not for those who prefer any sweetness/roundness in their Champagne, but for those of us mineral/acid heads this is nirvana. Was told that almost no dosage is used. Moved up to one of my three favorite bubblies ever.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment