Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(8)

  1. mdvillaverde

    mdvillaverde

    471 Tasting Notes

  2. sfwinelover1

    sfwinelover1

    899 Tasting Notes

  3. mclanew

    mclanew

    2,447 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (26) Avg Score: 93.5 points

  • 14.8% abv. A very hot nose with strong licorice notes. Dense, polished, bright fruit. Good acidity. Cedar, raspberry notes. Nice long finish.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Last of 6 and first in the past 14 months from an auction lot I’ve enjoyed immensely. The deliciousness factor of this wine is off the charts, right there with the best I’ve had, which didn’t seem foreordained when I had the first bottle 3+ years ago and the structure was already fully integrated. In the interim, this has become a wine that’s good to go off the opening, and it’s possible that the delineation and intensity have lost half a step, but it’s still just as good on night 2 as night 1, and while I wouldn’t sleep on it if holding more, I wouldn’t necessarily worry about drinking it in the next 24 hours if I had more (and would order more, even while drinking expeditiously, if offered the chance). As an aside, I’ve had tremendous experiences with this vintage, as good as any in the great ‘04-‘10 run (now largely forgotten with the arguably better, if shorter, ‘12-‘16 run).

    This was one of the first Phillippe Melka bottlings I drank, although I had several AOs and other stuff lying around, but I’ve had a Tusk (and as referenced in one of my TNs, it did in fact come from cs; thank you, kind sir!) and numerous VVs, and while all different bottlings and wineries (obviously) and more recent vintages all were notable for giant tannic structure, which hasn’t been present in this wine, making me wonder if this was a totally different creature in its youth than its relative senescence. Well, one way or another, it’s been a pleasure, and I’ll have to look for more data points. An easy 95 if scoring.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Fifth of 6 from the auction lot of about 2 years ago, and, to use the malapropism of a former president, I think I misunderestimated this wine. When I had the first bottle, which I didn't air out, although I really enjoyed it, I found it on the edge of extraction, a bit boozy and with underlying notes of prune to go with the cherries, cassis and blackberries, making me ponder if this was on the edge of oxidation. Four bottles and 2 years later, I've concluded that it's just the style of the bottling--perhaps Melka's house style--and in fact, with about 90 minutes of air, the extraction and booziness in fact integrate pretty well, which, when combined with otherwise effusive fruit, fabulous secondary notes and just enough tannic structure, make for a really great drink in this style, one which I can enjoy immensely, even if I have no desire or ability to consume it every night. Super pleased I bought this lot at what I paid for it and will look for more Melka wines going forward (although if I'm going to drink a Tusk, I'll probably have to rely on the generosity of strangers!). 95 if scoring.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Didn't seem right. Going to assume got fried at some point. Cork was fine.

    1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comments (1)

  • Bottle 3 of 6. Gave this 60-75+ minutes of air, which it appreciated. Consistent TNs with 8/19. Powerful and impressively complex, subtlety may not be the first word that comes to mind with this bottling, but this is absolutely delicious (or, as one of my favorite CT writers might say, fun). Really impressive persistence and intensity after air and on night 2 gives me the sense that this may not be as late in its drinking window as I initially thought, even with low acidity and improvement from here unlikely. If scoring, 94-95. Rock on, Philippe Melka.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 26 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    Vintage Retrospective: 2005 Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon (May 2016), 5/1/2016, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Vineyard 29 Aida Cabernet Sauvignon Napa) Login and sign up and see review text.
  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2008, IWC Issue #138, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Aida Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon St. Helena Napa Valley) Login and sign up and see review text.

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×