From 375. Popped and poured at the end of the night. This particular bottle was enjoyable in the nondescript way wines get when they are well past prime. Subdued aromas on the nose. Smooth and expansive on the palate. Some air may have helped this, but it didn't last long enough to find out.
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
(Montrose) was the year Michel Bettane was born, and he joked how the wine was 'a bit younger than me today.' At first, the nose was quite bizarre and total chalk city; it was almost as if we were smelling more glass than wine. The nose was extremely spiny in a floor cleaner way, but that is 1952, someone said, all finish. Nut and carob emerged on the nose and on the palate, and the palate was certainly all about '52 . a hard, whips and chains nature with robust tannins and finish. I found the wine quite tasty with lots of backside flavors of rust, brick, earth, leather, dust and cedar. It held quite well and had excellent stuffing. Bipin insisted on the 1952 being included after having an incredible magnum and said that it was one of the wines of the vintage. Someone remarked how '52s were better palate wines than nose ones, and Leoville Barton and Calon Segur also came up as sleepers, along with Mouton. The wine was excellent, bordering on outstanding but not quite
NOTE: Some content is property of JancisRobinson.com and Vintage Tastings.