Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(2)

  1. MoTheMan

    MoTheMan

    100 Tasting Notes

  2. D.Callahan

    D.Callahan

    512 Tasting Notes

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (83) Avg Score: 90.2 points

  • Frankly, I was expecting more from this wine. My two previous experiences were mediocre to good (84 and 87 points), but they were five and six years ago, respectively, and I had hopes that more time in the bottle would improve it, bring out more nuance, more interest. Sadly, that did not happen. But don't get me wrong; this is not a bad wine. It's just not a very good one. Simple and straightforward notes of ripe red apples and candied ginger. Lacks finesse and precision. Clunky finish. Not too bad for $20 perhaps. But at that price point, I prefer Domaine Carneros.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Very similar to my note from four years ago. Apple, lemon and toatsy notes with a rich palate/mouthfeel. Very fresh and young still.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • I have to thank Brad Baker for the recommendation on this one. Despite being a cali sparkler, this can hold its own with any decent champagne in the $30 to $50 price range. If you like rich pinot centric champagne's with some depth to them, then you will like the Royal Cuvee (especially with a little bit of age on it). It has lots of fruit up front, with nice depth, followed by almonds, toast, bread dough, spices, and cream. It is a little bit sweet, but that is a relatively minot complaint given its affordable $20 price point.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Once again this Gloria Ferrer was drinking very well and is an incredible value for roughly $20 per bottle. This wine puts many $50 to $65 bottles of champagne to shame (which is not an easy feat for a Cali sparkler). The flavors included oranges, pineapple, cinnamon, cream, toast, almonds, and spices. As I noted in my previous review, this sparkler leaned a bit to much on the heavy side, but that is only a minor complaint. The length was also impressive.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • This is one of the best non-champagne sparkling wines that I have tried. In fact, in a blind taste test, the 2001 Royal Cuvee would be very easy to mistake for a decent mid-range vintage champagne. The flavors are very pinot centric with juicy up front fruit, nuts, toast, bread dough, and cream along with good length. The only complaint I have is that it is a bit heavy and ponderous at times and is a bit to sweet. Regardless, this is an incredible value for a California sparkler and is a strong overall value at around $20 per bottle.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 83 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

i-WineReview.com

Champagne Warrior

NOTE: Some content is property of i-WineReview.com and Champagne Warrior.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Report a problem with the information on this page.

$Where to Buy
powered by wine-searcher.com
×