Who Likes This Wine(2)

  1. MoTheMan


    100 Tasting Notes

  2. D.Callahan


    526 Tasting Notes

Food Pairing Tags

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (83) Avg Score: 90.2 points

  • Frankly, I was expecting more from this wine. My two previous experiences were mediocre to good (84 and 87 points), but they were five and six years ago, respectively, and I had hopes that more time in the bottle would improve it, bring out more nuance, more interest. Sadly, that did not happen. But don't get me wrong; this is not a bad wine. It's just not a very good one. Simple and straightforward notes of ripe red apples and candied ginger. Lacks finesse and precision. Clunky finish. Not too bad for $20 perhaps. But at that price point, I prefer Domaine Carneros.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Very similar to my note from four years ago. Apple, lemon and toatsy notes with a rich palate/mouthfeel. Very fresh and young still.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • I have to thank Brad Baker for the recommendation on this one. Despite being a cali sparkler, this can hold its own with any decent champagne in the $30 to $50 price range. If you like rich pinot centric champagne's with some depth to them, then you will like the Royal Cuvee (especially with a little bit of age on it). It has lots of fruit up front, with nice depth, followed by almonds, toast, bread dough, spices, and cream. It is a little bit sweet, but that is a relatively minot complaint given its affordable $20 price point.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Once again this Gloria Ferrer was drinking very well and is an incredible value for roughly $20 per bottle. This wine puts many $50 to $65 bottles of champagne to shame (which is not an easy feat for a Cali sparkler). The flavors included oranges, pineapple, cinnamon, cream, toast, almonds, and spices. As I noted in my previous review, this sparkler leaned a bit to much on the heavy side, but that is only a minor complaint. The length was also impressive.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • This is one of the best non-champagne sparkling wines that I have tried. In fact, in a blind taste test, the 2001 Royal Cuvee would be very easy to mistake for a decent mid-range vintage champagne. The flavors are very pinot centric with juicy up front fruit, nuts, toast, bread dough, and cream along with good length. The only complaint I have is that it is a bit heavy and ponderous at times and is a bit to sweet. Regardless, this is an incredible value for a California sparkler and is a strong overall value at around $20 per bottle.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 83 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Champagne Warrior

NOTE: Some content is property of and Champagne Warrior.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews: