2005 Elio Grasso Barolo Gavarini Chiniera

Community Tasting Notes (26) Avg Score: 89.9 points

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Robmcl920's profile
  • Report Issue

  9/18/2022 - Robmcl920 Likes this wine: 92 Points

  The '05 Gavarini is a dark, spicy wine, similar to the '06 I tasted last week. Compared to that '06, this '05 appears to have a bit more acidity, less tannin, and a slightly redder fruit tone.
  
  On the nose, I found dark red cherry fruit, menthol, licorice, smoke, and sweet spices. On the palate, the wine was medium bodied with high acidity and a bit of a savory, earthy expression with sweet spices, mint, dark red cherry, earth, and a touch of iron. The acid is very high, standing out as a bit much in my opinion, while the tannins are present with a slightly grainy, drying mouth feel towards the back end, but definitely more subdued than the very tannic 2006.
  
  This is a good wine, albeit like the 2006, comes across as a bit rustic in terms of the flavor profile and the tannin profile compared to the more recent vintages of Grasso.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View Richard P Howden's profile
  • Report Issue

  7/17/2022 - Richard P Howden Likes this wine: 93 Points

  Brought to a restaurant, pnp. Lovely, complete wine, excellent with food (artisanal pizzas). Crunchy earth red fruited nose and palate, earthy and mineral long finish. Good balance. I was quite impressed with this wine, very good quality for the vintage and in a good place. Still showed a bit of tannin that was fine with the meal, will be good for a decade or more.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View grapenomad's profile
  • Report Issue

  3/10/2022 - grapenomad wrote: 91 Points

  Opened and decanted for about 2 hours, but definitely needed a whole day. Pale garnet in the glass. Aromatic, very soft - aromas of dried strawberries (those little forest ones), rhubarb, twigs, shiitake mushrooms & violets. Palate is smooth with just a slight grip of tannins and a blasting high acidity. Doesn’t change much in the glass throughout the night, but nonetheless still offers great value. Just a charcuterie plate is enough here, let the wine do the talking.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View peterseville's profile
  • Report Issue

  11/27/2021 - peterseville wrote:

  Not quite sure what to make of this wine. On the nose, ridiculously phenolic with notes of chocolate and iodine. On the palate, very tannic - completely coats the mouth. Needs a lot of time to open. Inaccessible on first pour.

  Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

• Options

  • Post a Comment
  • View aagrawal's profile
  • Report Issue

  9/17/2021 - aagrawal wrote: 91 Points

  Significant fine sediment in last 3oz despite standing up for months. Medium ruby with age-appropriate bricking for nebbiolo; aromatic, red and black cherry, slight spice and floral; palate is light-medium bodied, medium-plus acidity, medium alcohol (14%), red cherry, medium-plus tannins; finish is medium length. At least when initially opened, this is a balanced wine with all the pieces in place, perhaps a bit of a darker styled Barolo with slightly more mouthfeel though not at all heavy and not showing any extra alcohol. Seems consistent with the style of Monforte (quite high end), at early maturity. One of the better 2005s I've had. 90-91.
  4 hours decanted: Aromatics more prominent with a clear spice component, excellent black and red cherry throughout; still smooth and elegant but the tannins show a bit more especially towards the finish; medium length finish. Improving, lovely balance, and will age for at least another 5-10 years. 91
  7 hours after opening: unchanged from 4 hours. Balance is very good, complexity is good but not spectacular. Excellent value at $65 (bought at auction).
  Day 2: tannins still a force in this wine but overall well balanced and still with good fruit. Early maturity is probably right, not likely to develop substantial additional complexity. 91

  1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

View all 26 Community Tasting Notes

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.