St. Vincent (Indianapolis): Good stuff. Lots of bright red and dark fruit here, more savoury earthy, leathery, and faintly mushroom-like flavours beneath - this is in a nice spot now, with a great balance between fruit that's still quite ripe and youthful, and more savoury/umami-like development, and it's nicely balanced if feeling just a bit rustic and coarse on the finish where the tannin sticks out a bit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
2/10/2020 - kevin h wrote: 91 Points
Nicely mature, sour cherry, sous bois, a touch of tannin on the finish. Hints of menthol.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/9/2019 - nywine68 wrote: 90 Points
Not very expressive on the nose. This has dark black fruit and smoke on the palate. Lacks some vibrancy. Tannins are a bit drying.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/20/2018 - salil wrote: 90 Points
St. Vincent (Indianapolis): Good stuff. Lots of bright red and dark fruit here, more savoury earthy, leathery, and faintly mushroom-like flavours beneath - this is in a nice spot now, with a great balance between fruit that's still quite ripe and youthful, and more savoury/umami-like development, and it's nicely balanced if feeling just a bit rustic and coarse on the finish where the tannin sticks out a bit.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
6/1/2016 - FYC wrote:
Bright ruby in color. Still youthful with bright red fruit, some earthiness and nice mineral streak. Very balanced.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
8/17/2015 - Sennma wrote:
from magnum...a very solid burg but lacked a bit of that extra gear that you would expect.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment