First of four bottles ex WineBid. Decanted off of thick chunky sediment.
Moderately clear in the glass, garnet to a brick rim.
Nose has quite a bit of tertiary development; soy sauce/umami, touch of balsamic, library books, suede, dried flowers. There is still some soft fruit, more in the red spectrum. Pencilly. Oak not perceptible.
On the palate the wine has medium- body, mid-minus tannin, moderate acidity, moderate alcohol, medium-long finish. The texture is really nice, quite silky. The flavors largely follow the nose though the fruit is quite a bit more perceptible; bit of balsamic strawberry effect; plus some very nice sweet old-book vanillin.
This bottle seems like it was further along than some of the notes posted recently but it was certainly enjoyable — just did not come across as surprisingly youthful.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
As soon as I saw the colour I knew it would be good - barely a hint of brown on the edges. A very attractive nose of dark cherries, redcurrants, a little plum and a hint of mint. The first sip gave the game away - still fresh and fruity: Quite fresh at first, with red cherries and redcurrants, then wham - the intensity hits - wild strawberry and loganberry go straight to the top of the palate, followed by Victoria plums, before it eases into a very luxuriant, persistent finish, with just enough acidity to keep it away from any stodginess.
The style is really pretty classic - nothing OTT here. Absolutely delicious.
I’ve had quite a few MSG 2000s over the years and they haven’t always been great - clearly I opened them too early, because the improvement started a couple of years ago and this is the best by far. Probably the best MSG I have tried, in fact, certainly one of the best St.Emilions I’ve had from 2000. Only the fact I tried an even better Rauzan-Ségla 2000 not long ago prevents me from giving this more than 95 points
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
/ Comment
55F since acquisition on release - maintains score on differrent basis than last bottle - this bottle retains more primary briarberry character and fresh minty spiciness. Nice showing for 22 a year old purchased in idk maybe upper teens back in the day.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
/ Comment
Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.
8/26/2023 - jdp89 Likes this wine:
First of four bottles ex WineBid. Decanted off of thick chunky sediment.
Moderately clear in the glass, garnet to a brick rim.
Nose has quite a bit of tertiary development; soy sauce/umami, touch of balsamic, library books, suede, dried flowers. There is still some soft fruit, more in the red spectrum. Pencilly. Oak not perceptible.
On the palate the wine has medium- body, mid-minus tannin, moderate acidity, moderate alcohol, medium-long finish. The texture is really nice, quite silky. The flavors largely follow the nose though the fruit is quite a bit more perceptible; bit of balsamic strawberry effect; plus some very nice sweet old-book vanillin.
This bottle seems like it was further along than some of the notes posted recently but it was certainly enjoyable — just did not come across as surprisingly youthful.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
3/29/2023 - Vascular46 wrote: 89 Points
Retains deep color. Dark fruit (blueberry) and cassis on the nose and palate but somewhat faint at this time. Sorry I didn't drink it sooner
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
1/14/2023 - Julian Marshall Likes this wine: 95 Points
As soon as I saw the colour I knew it would be good - barely a hint of brown on the edges. A very attractive nose of dark cherries, redcurrants, a little plum and a hint of mint. The first sip gave the game away - still fresh and fruity: Quite fresh at first, with red cherries and redcurrants, then wham - the intensity hits - wild strawberry and loganberry go straight to the top of the palate, followed by Victoria plums, before it eases into a very luxuriant, persistent finish, with just enough acidity to keep it away from any stodginess.
The style is really pretty classic - nothing OTT here. Absolutely delicious.
I’ve had quite a few MSG 2000s over the years and they haven’t always been great - clearly I opened them too early, because the improvement started a couple of years ago and this is the best by far. Probably the best MSG I have tried, in fact, certainly one of the best St.Emilions I’ve had from 2000. Only the fact I tried an even better Rauzan-Ségla 2000 not long ago prevents me from giving this more than 95 points
3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment
10/12/2022 - Vascular46 Likes this wine: 89 Points
Deep ruby color with some dark fruit on the nose and palate. Unfortunately it is clearly past it's ideal drinking interval
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment
10/10/2022 - Tgood wrote: 91 Points
55F since acquisition on release - maintains score on differrent basis than last bottle - this bottle retains more primary briarberry character and fresh minty spiciness. Nice showing for 22 a year old purchased in idk maybe upper teens back in the day.
Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment