Advertisement

Who Likes This Wine(25)

  1. rikipedia

    rikipedia

    4,075 Tasting Notes

  2. jdp89

    jdp89

    63 Tasting Notes

  3. tunaguy

    tunaguy

    628 Tasting Notes

More

Food Pairing Tags

Community users think this wine goes best with:

Add My Food Pairing Tags

Community Tasting Notes (92) Avg Score: 91.2 points

  • First of four bottles ex WineBid. Decanted off of thick chunky sediment.

    Moderately clear in the glass, garnet to a brick rim.

    Nose has quite a bit of tertiary development; soy sauce/umami, touch of balsamic, library books, suede, dried flowers. There is still some soft fruit, more in the red spectrum. Pencilly. Oak not perceptible.

    On the palate the wine has medium- body, mid-minus tannin, moderate acidity, moderate alcohol, medium-long finish. The texture is really nice, quite silky. The flavors largely follow the nose though the fruit is quite a bit more perceptible; bit of balsamic strawberry effect; plus some very nice sweet old-book vanillin.

    This bottle seems like it was further along than some of the notes posted recently but it was certainly enjoyable — just did not come across as surprisingly youthful.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • Retains deep color. Dark fruit (blueberry) and cassis on the nose and palate but somewhat faint at this time. Sorry I didn't drink it sooner

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • As soon as I saw the colour I knew it would be good - barely a hint of brown on the edges. A very attractive nose of dark cherries, redcurrants, a little plum and a hint of mint. The first sip gave the game away - still fresh and fruity: Quite fresh at first, with red cherries and redcurrants, then wham - the intensity hits - wild strawberry and loganberry go straight to the top of the palate, followed by Victoria plums, before it eases into a very luxuriant, persistent finish, with just enough acidity to keep it away from any stodginess.

    The style is really pretty classic - nothing OTT here. Absolutely delicious.

    I’ve had quite a few MSG 2000s over the years and they haven’t always been great - clearly I opened them too early, because the improvement started a couple of years ago and this is the best by far. Probably the best MSG I have tried, in fact, certainly one of the best St.Emilions I’ve had from 2000. Only the fact I tried an even better Rauzan-Ségla 2000 not long ago prevents me from giving this more than 95 points

    3 people found this helpful, do you? Yes - No / Comment

  • Deep ruby color with some dark fruit on the nose and palate. Unfortunately it is clearly past it's ideal drinking interval

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

  • 55F since acquisition on release - maintains score on differrent basis than last bottle - this bottle retains more primary briarberry character and fresh minty spiciness. Nice showing for 22 a year old purchased in idk maybe upper teens back in the day.

    Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Comment

View all 92 Community Tasting Notes

What Do You Think? Add a Tasting Note

Professional reviews have copyrights and you can view them here for your personal use only as private content. To view pro reviews you must either subscribe to a pre-integrated publication or manually enter reviews below. Learn more.

Vinous

  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2002, IWC Issue #102, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Chateau Moulin Saint Georges Saint Emilion) Login and sign up and see review text.
  • By Stephen Tanzer
    May/June 2001, IWC Issue #96, (See more on Vinous...)

    (Chateau Moulin Saint Georges Saint Emilion) Login and sign up and see review text.

NOTE: Some content is property of Vinous.

Add a Pro Review Add Your Own Reviews:
 

Advertisement

×