De Librije(***), Zwolle, The Netherlands
Tasted Wednesday, May 12, 2010 by MauriceE with 1,224 views
Tasting of 4 vintages of the great domaine Armand Rousseau. The tasting was in the cellar of Librije's Zusje(*). After this we had a Chef's table lunch at De Librije(***). All wines were served blind (also at the lunch) except for the mouthwasher. Neither the vintage nor the order of the wines were revealed until afterwards.
Served blind at the Rousseau-tasting at de Librije. A very evolved nose, but surprisingly fresh in the mouth. Even some fruit there. A very, very experienced taster guessed 1978!! A great compliment for this wine for sure.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A little darker than the Chambertin. Full, a little harsh when just in the mouth. A lot of terroir here. After a while softer. Fine. 18+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A lot juicier than the Clos-de-Beze. More depth. Classy finish: long and lineair. In the middle a little harsh. Excellent fruit. 18,5
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Most purple of the flight, a lot of fruit in the nose, but also a little alcohol, also in the start of the taste. A little less long than the Chambertin, but also a fine finish. 18
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
At first a little "salty" nose and a little alcoholic, a little bitter. This was undoubtedly influenced by the previous flight (2007), because that year is só fruity. This is more built on minerality and terroir. After more than an hour this really showed it's worth. Beautiful wine. 18
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Dense, fine nose. A lot of terroir here, rich. A little darker than the Chambertin, more minerality as well. Very broad, but not quite so powerful. This wine also needed a lot of time. After more than an hour, this was at least on the level of the Chambertin 2007, but in fact a more typical wine, more terroir. This still needs time. Great class. 18,5
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Great nose, a little "creamy". This evolved very fine, but not as spectacular as the Clos-de-Beze. Still a very fine wine. 18+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very fruity and mineral nose, a little "warm", ripe fruit. A little lighter structured than the Clos-St-Jacques(!) and Clos-de-Beze. After an hour a little drying out. It could not quite confirm the first impression, but still a fine wine. 18+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Excellent balance, sappy and mineral. Very good length. Outshining even Chambertin itself. 18,5
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
This was the revelation of the tasting. I did not like many 2003 Burgs I had so far, but this is a very, very fine glass. It has good red fruit. A complete wine, greatness in the making? Nevertheless I devaluated it after an hour. My first score was 19,5, but like the Chambertin and Clos-St-Jacques it evolves to a kind of "dryness". I wonder how this will evolve. Some domaines in Bourgogne say 2003 is a year like 1947 that needed decades to really show it's worth. Could be, so far I'm not convinced. 19+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A little "milky" nose. Quite sour after the near-sweet 2003 flight. But this has very much terroir and length. But a step down from Chambertin and Clos-de-Beze. Nevertheless a very fine wine. 19
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Very full, complex nose. This seems to be the least evolved of the flight. I guess this has an excellent, perhaps great future. The fruit is just excellent and in complete harmony with the minerality. Yes, the balance of this wine is impaccable. Very lovely. 19,5
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Quite evolved nose (surprisingly!). Considerable length, but in the mouth so rich, velvety. Superb wine. Great class. Now as highly rated as the Clos-de-Beze, but I wonder which one has the greater future. As for now, I would guess the Clos-de-Beze, but with these wines you never know. 19,5
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
First wine at the Chef's Table at De Librije with amuses.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Second wine at Chef's table at De Librije. A little over-spiced nose. But I like the freshness of this wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
Great wine, near grand-cru level for Raveneau. This means it definitely has grand-cru level at any rate for other winemakers. Great length. Very fine wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
At Chef's table at De Librije this was served next to lobster. Hmmm, I'm not sure that was a good idea. It is definitely a fine wine, certainly for 2003. Very transparent style.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
A little dusty wine. But it has a great future I think. This just needs a lot of time and it will turn out a great wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
With a "fake-banana" at Chef's table at De Librije. Fine wine, it confirms 1999 is a very underrated year for Sauternes.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue
© 2003-24 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.
2007 Domaine Armand Rousseau Père et Fils Gevrey-Chambertin
France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Gevrey-Chambertin
Mouthwasher: very, very fruity. Subtle, mouthwatering. Good length, little sparkle. Nice starter.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No / Report Issue