New York
Tasted Thursday, March 11, 2010 - Monday, March 15, 2010 by amateurwino with 1,584 views
Full report and analysis at www.amateurwino.com
(3/13/2010)
my top wine of the tasting, this showed roasted nut/earth, fine slate, and some herbal character on the nose; a bit more perfumey than the other samples, the style is not hugely powerful, but refined and classy, with varietal character. Not as much complexity shows on palate as it does on the nose at this point, but I believe the material is there – tasty fruit, good ripeness, with a hint of spice on nose that I think will develop into good complexity. 93-95 pts. Reminds me a bit of La Conseillante. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
Simpler than fleur de gay, not as concentrated 87-88 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
A little spice and character on the palate 87-89 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
a little spicy character, generous fruit, quality-wise this looks to be in line with other recent vintages of Fleur Cardinale, which have been very strong; slight bit of perfume, certainly good concentration, round in style but not getting complexity yet at this point. 92-94 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
Feels more evolved and less primary than the other samples; good, not huge, bit of herbal character, perfume, lead pencil. Really quite good, excellent for the appellation, and more complexity shown here than in the 2003 and 2006 vintages of this wine (I have not tasted their 2005). 91-92+ (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
Fuller rounder sample than the Fleur de Bouard tasted just before this, showing much more power; tannic but smooth and round, with sweet fruits and some herbal varietal character that is welcome. Oak showing; this is quite nice, in a modern style. Nice bit of perfume as well. 91-93 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
More spice than the La Commanderie; similarly tannic and concentrated. 91-93+ On retaste, same, showing a bit more green herbal varietal character. Very good. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Located in the commune St. Christophe des Bardes; good and round, nice acidity. This is totally decent, with not quite the power of the samples tasted just before it, and maybe a bit simple too. 88-91. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
A chateau whose wine I liked very much in the 05 vintage, this shows a bit greener and herbal than most of the samples today, almost floral – owing to the high percentage of cabernet franc in the blend. Also some olive, savory character; bit of spice, medium-strong power. I expect this to be in line with the 2005, some dark notes on the finish, good concentration 91-93. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
A little olive, fairly concentrated and deep – there’s power here. Not a huge wine, but has definition, quite nice; bit of bitterness, perhaps a bit extracted, but not as powerful as some of the others. 91-93 pts. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Deep and concentrated, with some sweet fruit; very impressive for what it is, cuts a broad swath across the palate, a bit rough and tumble; not as finessed as Vieille Cure but more power here 91-93. A sleeper (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
little bit of floral, but nothing special here 83-84 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/13/2010)
my big-time sleeper of the tasting, this chateau may surprise many people with its quality in the 2009 vintage. It’s initially a little minty on the nose with sweet fruits; the palate has irresistible sweet fruit, as well as some spice. This is sweet without manufacturing it from heavy oak use, which can lead to artificial-feeling flavors; the allure comes from juicy, high quality fruit. Among the best samples today, it feels a little more evolved and less primary than most. This is not hugely complex yet, but makes an excellent showing based on the fruit, very sweet and pleasant across the palate. A real sleeper, no mistake – tasted three times to make sure. 92-94+ points. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Bottle says Cotes de Castillon/Cotes de Bordeaux. Has a very dark fruits feel, perhaps a bit extracted, but it's got some sweet fruit to it, not hugely distinguished, but totally decent. Very grapey, very primary. 87-88
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Has broad, round fruit but not finessed, maybe slightly cheap feeling fruit with oak that imparts a bit of a plastic feel. Powerful, grapey, but nothing special here.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Nose very full, verging on dark fruits, with a hint of a plastic aroma. Palate is smooth, but nondescript. 84-85. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Somewhat lighter nose; a bit floral; kind of dark, extracted, spicy – but not that pleasing 85-86 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Nose: little bit of red fruits, a bit of talcum powder; palate is interesting, a little spice, fairly primary, decent. A little bit of olive on the finish 85-87 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Fairly sweet fruits on the nose, a bit of talcum powder; palate is pleasing, very nicely done. 90-92 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(3/15/2010)
Alcohol on the nose, good decent concentration, sweet fruits happening 89-90. Very decent, quite enjoyable. Well done for a 2nd wine from an unheralded estate.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2009 Château de la Dauphine Fronsac
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Fronsac
(3/11/2010)
Primary, strong, bit of bitterness on finish; not too much oak showing on the nose, but it shows on the palate. Has potential. Definitely showing some oak on the palate. Not crazy about it. 86-87 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2009 Haut-Carles 90 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Fronsac
(3/13/2010)
Showing a bit more complexity than the Dauphine, a bit of spice with sweet fruit; palate is tannic, deep, spicy. Pretty impressive 89-91 very well done for Fronsac (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2009 Château Fonplégade 91 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
(3/13/2010)
Tannic, deep and concentrated, fairly smooth, not a lot of spice; bit more power than the 06 tasted just before 89-92 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2009 Château Barde-Haut 85 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Saint-Émilion Grand Cru
(3/13/2010)
Licorice showing on the nose; grapey. Has a slightly chemical/ estery sense to the nose at this point; sweet but simple fruit. 84-87, but could improve if the chemical thing resolves. (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2009 Clos l'Église (Pomerol) 93 Points
France, Bordeaux, Libournais, Pomerol
(3/13/2010)
A bit of spice and complexity; has power, quite tannic; retasted later in the tasting, this showed a little coffee on the nose, with very round fruits – refined, quite perfumey, very good, 92-94 (barrel sample)
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No