Vancouver, BC
Tasted Friday, April 2, 2010 by godx with 581 views
Tasted blind – dark red at the core moving to a medium red/brick towards the rim. Great nose of black currants and plums with hints of mint. Nose had me guessing this was a cab sauv. Medium body with solid tannins and acidity. Good mouth feel. Drinking well now but no rush. Excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tasted blind – dark to medium red showing some age at the rim. Notes of black cherries, some spice and hints of dirtiness. Decent amount of structure left with medium tannins and higher acid. Nose reminded me of Bordeaux yet the palate was giving me lots of tell-tale Syrah notes. Soft and silky in the mouth. Needs time. Excellent. 90+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Opened 4 hours before serving. Nice brownish hue colour with some red/orange at the core. Great nose of sweeter red fruits with lots of meaty and vegetal notes as well. Soft on the palate and well balanced. Medium body and acid with some tannins still hanging around. This is in a good spot and drinking very nicely but no rush. Excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tasted blind – at first a few us detected very slight amounts of TCA but most at the table couldn’t detect it and declared it was a muskiness that blew off after a minutes. Still a nice nose of eucalyptus, black fruits and cedar. Lots of structure left in this one. Not as refined as the '90 Pegau but that may change with a few more years. Excellent. 90+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tasted blind – wow, big nose full of bell pepper, dill, ashtray and bright red fruits. Had me thinking cab franc but when Bordeaux was eliminated after someone’s incorrect guess, I went straight to Cornas. I love the noses on these Clape wines. Medium to full body with good amounts of tannin and acid left. This wasn’t as rustic as the ‘96 I tried a few months ago, but was softer in the mouth and clearly more fruit forward. More refined than its older sibling and drinking very well. Overall I prefer the ’96, but this isn't far behind. Excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tasted blind – darkest wine yet. Jammy nose with tons of vanilla and sweet red and black fruits making it quite obvious where this was from. The concentration of sweet fruit is still very apparent even at 20 years of age, which no one guessed. On the palate sweet black fruits with a solid tannins and acidity. Full bodied. Who says Aussie wines can’t age? Drinking well but no rush. Very good.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Opened and served right away (note: when I grabbed this bottle there was some goo seeping out from under the capsule and when I removed it there was even more underneath). Medium gold colour. Pronounced nose of petrol, citrus (mainly lime) and hints of tropical fruits. Thick and weighty on the palate giving more citrus notes and some sweetness, but the flavours not as pronounced as on the nose. Pretty well balanced. This definitely showed much more age on the nose than the palate. Medium acidity and medium to full body. Finished seemed to fade a little quicker than id like. My last few bottles seemed to be slightly fuller and more flavourful on the palate, but this was still very nice. Drink now. Excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Tasted blind – dark red/purple in colour. Concentrated notes of reduced black fruits, black currants and black liquorice. Some heat coming through on the palate. Needs time. Excellent. 90+
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2005 Schramsberg Vineyards Blanc de Noirs Brut 90 Points
USA, California, North Coast
Tasted blind – medium straw in colour. On the nose yeasty notes with loads of green apple and doughy notes on the palate. Crisp mouth feel with a good amount of acidity. Nice tartness. As it sat in the glass it seemed to gain complexity. Long finish, medium body and very dry. I liked this a lot and would have guessed Champagne for sure. Drink or hold. Excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 Michel & Stéphane Ogier Viognier de Rosine 85 Points
France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Collines Rhodaniennes
Tasted blind – medium to dark yellow in colour. Strong oxidative and funky notes on the nose with honey, cheese and hints of floral that had some of us guessing Viognier. Soft yet weighty on the palate. Flavours not nearly as pronounced as the nose. This is my first experience with an older Viognier, and while it’s clearly a well made wine and others seemed to enjoy it, it wasn’t my cup of tea. Nose was more enjoyable than the palate. Drink now. Good.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 Bouchard Père et Fils Meursault 1er Cru Les Genevrières 89 Points
France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Meursault 1er Cru
Tasted blind – light yellow in colour. Fresh nose yeast and citrus notes on the nose that seems almost spritzy at first. Quite a bit of oak coming through on the finish. Medium body and acid. Drank side by side with the Latour-Giraud of the same vintage and vineyard. Drink or hold. Very good.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 Domaine Latour-Giraud Meursault 1er Cru Les Genevrières 90 Points
France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Meursault 1er Cru
Tasted blind – slightly darker than the Bouchard in colour. Toasty and nutty nose. Crisper on the palate with high acidity and fresher flavours. This was showing more Chardonnay typicity than the Bouchard. This wine has the fresher palate, whereas the Bouchard had the fresher nose. I really liked this. Excellent.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No