Mt. Veeder, Oakville, Spring Mountain, St. Helena, Calistoga, Napa
Tasted Friday, October 22, 2010 - Monday, October 25, 2010 by prettydeceextrap with 1,518 views
Started the morning atop Mt. Veeder with Mayacamas. Then drove down Oakville Grade to Detert. Then on to St. Helena to visit neighboring wineries: Lewelling, Anomaly, Chase Family.
Spring Mountain day. Morning started with Pete at Ritchie Creek. Then to Sherwin, followed by Relic, and finally finishing Spring Mountain at Andesite. Ended the day with Amy at Meander.
(10/23/2010)
Spring Mountain grown pinot ... the only one other than School House I know. But totally different than the School House. This one is more floral, with delicate fruit. Slightly grape-y, yet aerates well. Tasted Sonoma-coast like, but a bit rougher on the edges.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Really enjoyed this wine, even in its youth. Pete seems to be making lower alcohol, higher acid wine up there, and he really pulls it off. Light in color, it has raspberry and a bit of menthol and light cedar. The wine is smooth, but dries out the sides of the tongue. With air, it opened a slightly floral note.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Unique indeed. Not sure of it's geneology, but it seemed pinot-eque. But much bigger than his other pinot, this one had big cherry notes and what seemed like decent acid. Like his other wines, this one is floral too, but moreso than the other ones at Ritchie Creek. With air, it developed some darker fruit in the background, and a little bit of wet wood came through. Seems like a great food-wine.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
This is pretty huge wine, like the rest of the Sherwin stable. Surely a similar wine-making strategy with his big boy cab. A fun wine, that definitely has more spice and kick than that beautifully balanced cab of theirs. Blue fruit and oak, with a bit too much alcohol. Coats the palate, and finishes strong.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Always fantastic. Fat, rich wine with plenty of alcohol, yet it needs time in the bottle. Big, bold vanilla and dark fruit. 2 minute finish. It's the real thing, but I think it needs a few years. Definitley asked for a second pour, and Steve kindly accomodated. Awesome stuff. Score sure to go up with time.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
It's just too big right now. Riidiculously concentrated, and is flirting with 16% alcohol. It pretty much blows out your taste buds, and gets a bit too close to the Parker-driven Australian style for my liking. Steve told us they are doing away with the Syrah (which is tough to sell) in order to sell Chardonnay (and what he described was oaky butter bomb = BOO). Still, I am hoping this integrates with time. I honestly couldn't really taste it past the heat.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
This is my kind of pinot ... like most sonoma coasts but on steroids. Tons of spices in there to make it interesting, with just enough back palate to even things out. Smooth drinking and wonderfully complex.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Awesome wine! Deep, almost inky color with a thick, rich fruit base and taste bud gripping spices. Balanced and evolving, I wish I had bought more.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Another phenomenal wine from Mike Hirby. Incredibly dark and concentrated, yet with a lot of structure. The alcohol doesn't overpower, and this was a perfect style contrast to the huge heat-bomb syrah at Sherwin earlier in the day. The tightness gives the impression of hillside fruit, which is mostly dark fruits like blackberries. I get a hint of wood and fennel in the nose and at the very end of each sip. Again, I wish I had bought more.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Big, hillside cabernet, still needing lots of time to integrate. Structure is there. I get rich, dark fruits that can't quite express themselves yet. Lots of graphite and winter spices. Tannins need to resolve, but you can tell this one will be great. Keep it coming, Mr. Hirby!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
A brand new label, with 2007 being the first commerical vintage. The property sits just below Paloma, and the style is unmistakably similar. Restrained, complex, and distinctly Spring Mountain. Drinking well now, surely to open a bit more over the upcoming 2-3 years. Will be interesting to follow this label!
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
A fresh, clean sauvignon blanc. Plenty of tropical fruit and stone fruit, with a clean metallic finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Seemed like a well crafted, yet typical pinot. I get sweet grape and raspberries, with just enough complexity of spices to make it worth drinking.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/23/2010)
Still in it's youth, this wine needs time to express itself. I get a lot of rutherford dust, and ripe red fruits. Vanilla and a bit of licorice ... everything still needs to integrate. Lots of promise.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Started at White Rock near Stag's Leap. Then drove up to meet with Rollie Heitz at Midcellar Cellars. Had a formal tasting with Lin at Venge. Finished the day with an awesome visit to Mike Smith at the Carter/Envy facility. He poured his Quivet and Myriad releases.
(10/24/2010)
An intriguing wine. Blinded, I would have thought this was a Dijon clone pinot, of all things. Mellow, wonderful sweetness with a complex spicy background. Yellow flowers, cherries, and cranberries. Really a nice wine once it comes around, and once you accept it is Sangiovese.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
A nice little cab, capable of drinking now. Priced fairly. Red, sweet fruit witha bit of spice.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
A bit acidic still, needs time in the bottle. Seems to be well constructed, with tart blackberry coming out. Licorice and chocolate.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
A well integrated Syrah. Perhaps meant to age, I think it is drinking well now. Big dark fruit, with enough "fatty" mouthfeel to stand up to big food. Still distinctly Syrah.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
The best chardonnay of the trip. They really highlight the fruit, and a nice bit of oak peeks through without overpowering. Layered and complex.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Priced really well. I think this wine is a bit more integrated right now than the Laureate cab. Nicely blended, the wine layers the palate sequentially from front to back.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Still full of acid, capable of years more in the bottle. Very tight, some air helps it along. Hillside characteristics with tons of backbone, and hint that the fruit will be rearing it's head shortly.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Perhaps because it is technically Knight's Valley (I think), the QRP is sky-high. At $25, you simply won't find better wine. Perfectly oaked, I would drink this wine with anything from duck to steak, and would be perfectly content to drink it by itself. Buy them up.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
For me, not quite as complex as the Canon Creek, but still a great example of well-constructed 100% cabernet.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Drinking pretty welll now, with plenty of back palate. The best of the three wines in my opinion, this one really starts to hit once you give it a bit of air. Very nicely highlights the fruit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Compared to the 07 we drank recently, the 08 isn't quite together yet. Red fruit and oak up front. Would wait on it a little bit.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
HUGE. Distinctly different from the Myriad Spring Mountain, I found this have just a bit more of everything. Blue and red fruit, oak and a touch of vanilla. Very smooth and cremy finish.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Fantastic Spring Mountain wine. Takes all the red fruit and mountain structure, and just elevates it 5-10 steps. Drinking well now, this one I think could use some time in the bottle.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Lots of red fruit and a bit of vanilla. I got some mocha too. A full palate wine that is drinking really well right now. You simply won't find a better made wine at this price.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Beautifully giant. My favorite of the lineup, this one is singing in it's youth. It will undoubtedly change with a bit of time in the bottle, but I'm not sure it will get any better. Cassis, cherries, perfect wood.
Post a Comment / 1 person found this helpful, do you? Yes - No
(10/24/2010)
Incredible. In terms of overall complexity and integration, this is sure to be the best of the bunch. Drinking surprisingly smoothly for a wine this young, with all the fruit, backbone, and size you expect from Mike Smith.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
Started at Laird Cellars with Bev from Hollywood and Vine. Then drove out to meet with George at Moss Creek.
(10/25/2010)
Another nice example of non-ML, oak aged chardonnay. Refreshing, yet some structure from the oak.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/25/2010)
A really nicely put together wine. Much more structure, cream, and dust than you typically expect at this price. I wouldn't age it, as it's ready now.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/25/2010)
It is definitely an 89+, and for whatever reason, the number I came up with doesn't really do it justice. No mistake, this is a premium wine. 5 vineyards come together beautifully, with red fruit, chocolate, licorice, figs, and a tiny bit of rose-water. Very complex and multi-dimensional.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/25/2010)
Not your typical Zin. This is thick, syrupy, and drinking wonderfully. Raisiny and pruney, in the good way. The spice isn't your typically zin pepper, but sweet spices, and only in the background.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/25/2010)
An amazing Merlot. Dense, almost crystalline color, with a nice Bordeaux nose. Lasted for minutes on the palate. Well crafted, and very very ready to drink.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
(10/25/2010)
Fantastic. George opened this for us on a tasting, which was much appreciated. Perfectly integrated. Blinded, you would guess this is an aged Bordeaux. All that ground, brick, and French stink. Even a litte wet cheese. The flavor is fully rounded, with strawberry, cherries, and even fine-liquor in the background. Rivals for wine of the trip. At least from an aged example, Moss Creek is making super premium, age-worthy wine to rival the rest of Napa.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
© 2003-26 CellarTracker! LLC. All rights reserved. "CellarTracker!" is a trademark of CellarTracker! LLC. No part of this website may be used, reproduced or distributed without the prior written permission of CellarTracker! LLC.

2007 Mayacamas Vineyards Chardonnay 85 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Mt. Veeder
(10/22/2010)
Very nice chardonnay. Crisp, though not complex. Some of the typical tropical fruits, a little grass.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2000 Mayacamas Vineyards Chardonnay 89 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Mt. Veeder
(10/22/2010)
Wow. What a difference a few years makes. This 10 year old chard has a tiny bit of caramel in the background, that somehow seems to linger. Flowers and wheat up front. As this wine got no ML (I think), the butter and creaminess must have come from age. Excellent. The score should be higher.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2006 Mayacamas Vineyards Merlot 92 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Mt. Veeder
(10/22/2010)
Mountain fruit. Not quite together yet. A bit acidic, but the structure and spice are all there. Red red fruits. Looking forward to putting a few years on this.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Mayacamas Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon 91 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Mt. Veeder
(10/22/2010)
Also Mountain fruit, also not quite together yet. Wonderful fruit and tons of structure, this wine will surely need at least 5 more years. Not quite as "big" as the Merlot somehow. High quality winemaking shows through.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2007 Detert Family Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon Oakville 88 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Oakville
(10/22/2010)
A big wine, though not quite complex. Nice sweet wood and both red and dark fruits. Perhaps not quite worth the price, still well put together.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2007 Detert Family Vineyards Cabernet Franc 93 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Oakville
(10/22/2010)
Drank alongside their 04 and 05 cab franc. This one was probably the best of the bunch. Big, bold fruit with smoke and graphite, along with black licorice and anise. Complex in the mid-palate.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Detert Family Vineyards Cabernet Franc 87 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Oakville
(10/22/2010)
A good wine, but overshadowed by their 04 and 07 cab franc which accompanied it. A bit sweeter, with a cherry and chocolate profile. Less overall structure.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2004 Detert Family Vineyards Cabernet Franc 93 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Oakville
(10/23/2010)
Drank alongside their 05 and 07 cab franc. This one was just as good as the 07, though in a different way. More nuanced, with more back-palate. Fruit a little more integrated into the oaky, smokey background. Loved it.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2007 Anomaly Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon 93 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley
(10/22/2010)
Side by side with the 06 Anomaly. The 07 was smoother and had a certain pop that the 06 lacked. Plenty of dark fruit, and plenty of vanilla. But this isn't a one trick pony. A little charcoal is in there too, with a pleasant juniper and sweet anise cookie background. Most notable quality may have been the tongue coating velvety smooth mouthfeel.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2006 Anomaly Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon 90 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley
(10/22/2010)
Drank next to the 07 Anomaly. The 06 is very good, but gets outshined by it's 07 counterpart. A bit more vanilla, and a bit tarter fruit. Less of the complexities in the background. Also extremely smooth on the palate, something that both the 06 and 07 shared.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2008 Lewelling Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon St. Helena 92 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
Very syrupy, full of alcohol but seemingly without the distracting heat. Lasted for minutes in the mouth, with tons of mid-palate. Not sure how it will age, as it drank well right out of the bottle. Lots of swirling helped blow off some of the alcohol. Fantastically floral with just enough white pepper to make it interesting.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2008 Lewelling Vineyards Cabernet Sauvignon Wight 95 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
It's pretty much a more dense, bigger version of their regular cab. Even more fruity, more concentrated. And that unique spicy/floral characteristic absolutely sings. Everything is heightened without losing any balance. Drinks right along with any super-premium wine in the valley.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2009 Chase Zinfandel Rosé Hayne Vineyard 84 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
Interestingly sweet. Not much else going on.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2007 Chase Zinfandel Hayne Vineyard 87 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
A thick, pretty dark zin with a lot of sweetness up front and some spice in back. Actually pretty well balanced. Not as deep as the reserve, but a real solid wine for a weeknight.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2006 Chase Zinfandel Hayne Vineyard 88 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
Better than the 07 to me, though my score don't reflect it. Not quite as thick, and just a little more pepper.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2006 Chase Zinfandel Reserve Hayne Vineyard 87 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
Quite different from the non-reserves we tasted. This one was a bit more concetrated, and ventures down the prune-raisin path. More backbone and structure. Enjoyed, but couldn't help thinking that Turley seems to do a better job with the Hayne vineyard.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2006 Chase Cabernet Sauvignon 85 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, St. Helena
(10/22/2010)
Lacks identity, especially considering the wines being made by their neighbors. I would call it a dusty everyday cab.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2005 Chase Petite Sirah Hayne Vineyard 89 Points
USA, California, Napa Valley, Calistoga
(10/22/2010)
Best wine of the lineup. Dark and tannic ... needs time, but seems huge.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No