Russell's, Bothell, WA
Tasted Saturday, March 19, 2011 by last chance with 1,339 views
A group of 10 of us got together up a Russell's in Bothell for a Betz vertical tasting (a few tasters had to cancel last minute). Russell's does not charge a corkage fee for any WA wines that you open, so it's really a nice place to go for a big tasting like this. After the vertical tasting, we were going to taste other Cabernets that were priced in the $45 to $60 range just to see if we thought anything was "Better than Betz"... Though with all the Betz fans in this group, that was going to be highly unlikely...
We started out with a couple bottles of whites, and a nice Rosé that Dave made. The 2007 Betz Rosé was just too old to be fun, and it didn't get passed around.
On to the Betz tasting... We started out with the Cabernet portion of the tasting by starting with the oldest vintages first. As it turned out, the oldest wine was pretty much everyone's favorite of not only the first flight, but of the entire tasting also. It was in everyone's Top 3 of the tasting for sure. By the end of this flight, the jokes were flying around the table about the tasting being all downhill from here... They were just jokes - but that 1997 Alpha was seriously a very delicious wine! I ended up ranking this flight 1. 1997, 2. 1998 and then 3. 1999.
This was a fun flight for me. As soon as we tasted the 2000, it just seemed a lot more familiar profile than the 1998 or 1999. The 2000 vintage was when Bob started sourcing fruit from Ciel du Cheval for the Pére de Famille. Just as notable as the addition of Ciel du Cheval was the exclusion of Portteus vineyard. By the end of the first flight, there had been a lot of discussion amongst the group about what part of the 1998 and 1999 profiles came from the fruit sourced from Portteus vineyard. I haven't tasted a lot of fruit from Portteus vineyard, but I do know that I didn't notice brett on any of the non-Portteus vintages. I ended up ranking this flight 1. 2002, 2. 2001 and then 3. 2000.
By this point of the tasting, the vineyards selected to be included in the Pére de Famille blend were tweaked enough that they looked very similar to the current selections. The highlight of this flight for me was the delicious minty cocoa notes on the 2004 vintage. There was a lot of discussion on our end of the table about how many great wines came out of 2004, but because of the Walla Walla freeze, the vintage just doesn't get the recognition that it actually deserves. I know that I have been guilty of that - but I'm sure going to work on it going forward. The 2004 Pére de Famille was one of the top WA wines that I have tasted from that vintage. I ended up ranking this flight 1. 2004, 2. 2003 and then 3. 2005.
Now we're getting into some much higher percentages of Cabernet Sauvignon in the blends as well as just some sheer power from the young wines. This was a great flight, and capped off a very nice look of how the Pére de Famille had not only developed and evolved in the bottle, but also how the vineyard selections and blending shaped the wine from vintage to vintage into what it has become for the current 2008 release. I ended up ranking this flight 1. 2008, 2. 2007 and then 3. 2006.
Once we had finished with the Betz portion of the tasting, the organizers wanted to taste some wines from other producers that were also labeled as Cabernet Sauvignons and were available to purchase in the $45-$60 range. The purpose of this portion of the tasting was to highlight what a value the Pére de Famille is when you consider the alternatives in the same price range. This first flight of the "Better than Betz?" portion had a mix of styles - the 2001 Dutch Henry was a real outlier in this flight. None of these in the first flight were considered to be Better than Betz by the group... and no one was surprised.
We continued the "Better than Betz?" portion of the tasting with a couple of wines that we were going to taste blind. Turned out that the 2001 Dutch Henry might have fit in better with this flight, but we couldn't have known that because these were blind to all of us except the individual who brought them. I really enjoyed the 2001 Matthews Elerding Reserve, but again... not Better than Betz.
There were just a couple more wines brought to taste for this portion. Wow, that Myriad was really nice - but there were also several tasters in the group that didn't enjoy it at all. That happens in a diverse tasting group, but it's funny that it doesn't happen with this group and Betz... So, once again... the group consensus was that nothing here was Better than Betz.
This was a delicious bottle of late harvest Semillon! I've got a few from other WA producers, but after this, I'm going to try to age them longer than I have been.
This was another fantastic tasting! It was great to have so much specific information about the wines while we were tasting them. I found myself looking back a them a lot when I noticed a change in the style to see if a grape was added or taken away from the mix, or even if a vineyard source changed. My overall favorites from the Betz portion of the tasting were the 1997, the 2004 and the 2008 - but to be able to taste all of them in a single tasting was really a great experience!
2005 Louis Latour Chassagne-Montrachet 1er Cru Les Caillerets 88 Points
France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Chassagne-Montrachet 1er Cru
The nose of this wine initially had pear and lemon/lime aromas. After some swirling in the glass, it picked up a nice eucalyptus aroma as well. The palate had a crisp and clean attack with pear and green tea flavors, but was relatively flat on the mid-palate. It did have quite a bit of minerals and high-toned spices that came through on the finish. Some tasters with more experience drinking white Burgundies than me thought that this bottle may be showing some signs of premox. I'm really not sure what to think about that, but I had noted that it was flat on the mid-palate and that was the main thing that other tasters thought wasn't correct for this bottle.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2003 Foreau Domaine du Clos Naudin Vouvray Moelleux 93 Points
France, Loire Valley, Touraine, Vouvray
The nose had aromas of honeydew melon with some floral and nutty notes. The palate had flavors of apple, peach, and nice nutty and smokey undertones. The mouthfeel of this wine was huge, and even a little unctuous. This did have a nice amount of sweetness to it, and it did go very well some some mixed cheeses. I wondered if tasting this wine next to a white Burgundy made the Burg seem a little flat? I loved this Vouvray, and will be looking to get some with a few years of age on them.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2010 Kaella Winery Rosé Ciel du Cheval Vineyard 90 Points
USA, Washington, Columbia Valley, Red Mountain
Bright reddish-pink color. The nose had aromas of watermelon and raspberry. As we were talking about the wine, it was mentioned that someone had noticed a bubble gum aroma. I was able to notice a real faint trace of a bubble gum note at that point. It wasn't unpleasant or rubbery at all, and I thought it fit in well with the other aromas. The palate had very fresh and light red fruit and citrus flavors. I really enjoyed this Rosé.
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No
2007 Betz Family Rosé Petite Rousse
USA, Washington, Columbia Valley
This was over the hill. I just waited too long to drink it. There was a substantial amount of sediment in the bottle, and it had lost most of it's fruit. Not bright and fresh any more, just tart...
Post a Comment / Do you find this review helpful? Yes - No